"One of the most special?" ... seriously? Did a pre-schooler write this?
It's either "the most special" or "one of the special" .... talk about butchering the King's English.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
"One of the most special?" ... seriously? Did a pre-schooler write this?
Some "posters" prefer to find potential positives wherever possible I suppose. If you actually read my post then you'd note that I said there's every chance that we can snag Ben - not a lock but a chance. Also, you're bitching on about midfield class and when some conversation is put up to perhaps indicate that we might already have some on our list you'd rather revert to sooking it up to no one in particular...chico2001 wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 10:36amNot sure why posters are hanging their hat on the brother coming from the suns to the saints. It wasn't a 2 for 1 deal FFS. He hasn't even got there yet and already he is coming to the saints. So that implies clever recruiting does it? Lets work with picking some good midfielders from the picks we have left and then we will see how good our recruiters really are.outside66 wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 10:29am I think the comp would've laughed at us if we didn't pick up a player who was widely considered to be worthy of a top pick. It's delicious to think that within two years there's every chance that we'll get Ben off the Suns.
Regarding midfield class, I would say that these blokes on our list have the potential to become that class we need in the middle; Clark, Coffield, Phillips, Acres, Billings, Gresh
IF these blokes fire up and compliment Steven, Ross, Steele, and Hannebery, then bloody look out I say!
You seem to idolise the Blues, please stop posting such utter drivel here and go barrack for them...ListManager wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 8:40am Blind Freddie can see we are screaming out for midfield class. What do we do? We draft a 204 cm bean pole with a bung knee. Mark my words, even though I have taken great delight smashing Carlton and watching them win spoon after spoon lately, they are now miles ahead of us. In fact, I can see them winning their 17th flag in the next 5 years while we are still waiting for McCartin to come good.
Quantity vs quality. Paton and Langlands were never genuine midfielders, were they?
I wouldn't think so. It never worked for me;)
So they haven’t played “in the guts” at TAC level. Are they ball winners - or just receivers?saynta wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 11:29am From AFL Record.
"Overlooked by every club in 2016. Paton was drafted last year after playing in the backline for Murray Bushrangers. However a glut of midfielders at his TAC Cup side was part of the reason he was stationed in defence . St Kilda sees Paton as a wingman with quality foot skills on both sides of his body, an impressive leap and heaps of speed .
Yes, he is a true outside mid .
So is Doulton, who has an impressive tank with tons of acceleration and speed.
He was previously a member of the GWS Academy.
Both players are highly regarded by the Saints.
...right up until Kennedy and Darling got on top of them.The_Dud wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 10:04amCollingwood showed this year that big forward aren’t crucialsamoht wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:54amspert wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:40am There's no guarantee that any new young recruit will meet expectations- we need to give it time. No good having class midfielders who kick to the forwards who get outmarked by the opposition. There is just as much case for getting class in the midfield as there is getting a quality big forward.
We already have enough big, strong forwards who can take strong marks - Marshall, McCartin , Battle - even Membrey.
What we don't have is elite-skilled midfielders to deliver it lace-out to them on a consistent basis. We need quality entries.
The indiscriminate bombing into the forward line was not a flawed/misguided coaching idea - it was due to our poor kicking skills.
Which one of our midfielders is an elite kick?
We don't seem to be able to kick decent scores with all that supposed marking power- the opposition backs seemed to be able the judge the ball better than most of our forwards in one-on-one contests. If King is a mobile big marking forward, rather than a mark or nothing forward like Paddy, then it's a win for us.samoht wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:54amspert wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:40am There's no guarantee that any new young recruit will meet expectations- we need to give it time. No good having class midfielders who kick to the forwards who get outmarked by the opposition. There is just as much case for getting class in the midfield as there is getting a quality big forward.
We already have enough big, strong forwards who can take strong marks - Marshall, McCartin , Battle - even Membrey.
What we don't have is elite-skilled midfielders to deliver it lace-out to them on a consistent basis. We need quality entries.
The indiscriminate bombing into the forward line was not a flawed/misguided coaching idea - it was due to our poor kicking skills.
Which one of our genuine midfielders is an elite kick?
Similarly ...degruch wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 11:38am...right up until Kennedy and Darling got on top of them.The_Dud wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 10:04amCollingwood showed this year that big forward aren’t crucialsamoht wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:54amspert wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:40am There's no guarantee that any new young recruit will meet expectations- we need to give it time. No good having class midfielders who kick to the forwards who get outmarked by the opposition. There is just as much case for getting class in the midfield as there is getting a quality big forward.
We already have enough big, strong forwards who can take strong marks - Marshall, McCartin , Battle - even Membrey.
What we don't have is elite-skilled midfielders to deliver it lace-out to them on a consistent basis. We need quality entries.
The indiscriminate bombing into the forward line was not a flawed/misguided coaching idea - it was due to our poor kicking skills.
Which one of our midfielders is an elite kick?
West Coast are hardly the poster boy for quality F50 delivery.samoht wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 11:41amSimilarly ...degruch wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 11:38am...right up until Kennedy and Darling got on top of them.The_Dud wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 10:04amCollingwood showed this year that big forward aren’t crucialsamoht wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:54amspert wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 9:40am There's no guarantee that any new young recruit will meet expectations- we need to give it time. No good having class midfielders who kick to the forwards who get outmarked by the opposition. There is just as much case for getting class in the midfield as there is getting a quality big forward.
We already have enough big, strong forwards who can take strong marks - Marshall, McCartin , Battle - even Membrey.
What we don't have is elite-skilled midfielders to deliver it lace-out to them on a consistent basis. We need quality entries.
The indiscriminate bombing into the forward line was not a flawed/misguided coaching idea - it was due to our poor kicking skills.
Which one of our midfielders is an elite kick?
Marshall, Membrey , Battle, McCartin etc.. would be unstoppable with quality delivery.
Quality delivery is the key ,,, what we’re currently lacking.
It’s easy to reach across and spoil a poorly directed or skyed entry ... a defender can leave their immediate opponent and outnumber the area where the misdirected kick ends up going ... and there’s a 3 to 1 that our forwards need to contend with.
That’s why we struggle to kick our goals, while our opponents make it look easier - with their better entries.
Yes they have, Paton in 2016 and Dalton last year.samoht wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 11:37amSo they haven’t played “in the guts” at TAC level. Are they ball winners - or just receivers?saynta wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 11:29am From AFL Record.
"Overlooked by every club in 2016. Paton was drafted last year after playing in the backline for Murray Bushrangers. However a glut of midfielders at his TAC Cup side was part of the reason he was stationed in defence . St Kilda sees Paton as a wingman with quality foot skills on both sides of his body, an impressive leap and heaps of speed .
Yes, he is a true outside mid .
So is Doulton, who has an impressive tank with tons of acceleration and speed.
He was previously a member of the GWS Academy.
Both players are highly regarded by the Saints.
Bailey Smith wins his own ball and has pace.... that’s the difference.
You serious? That's currently a very very average fwd line at best.
very delicious!!outside66 wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 10:29am I think the comp would've laughed at us if we didn't pick up a player who was widely considered to be worthy of a top pick. It's delicious to think that within two years there's every chance that we'll get Ben off the Suns.
Regarding midfield class, I would say that these blokes on our list have the potential to become that class we need in the middle; Clark, Coffield, Phillips, Acres, Billings, Gresh
IF these blokes fire up and compliment Steven, Ross, Steele, and Hannebery, then bloody look out I say!
Sure I'm serious.Moods wrote: ↑Fri 23 Nov 2018 3:38pmYou serious? That's currently a very very average fwd line at best.
Marshall? Has great potential, but as of this stage has barely kicked a goal.
Membry? Our best fwd. But he's a 3rd tall. A very good one, but hardly a Darling type.
Battle? Once again. Has showed glimpses, but as yet has really done nothing. Looks promising. Also has barely kicked a goal in the AFL.
McCartin? TBH a massive disappointment so far in his career. Nothing to suggest he would be unstoppable and he has played lots more than the others.
Well, it might seem that way to you.