Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Safe to assume we end up with Pick 4 and Lukosius and Walsh are already gone.
Should we go the solid looking local lad Bailey Smith or someone with X factor like Conor Rozee who might carry a 'go home factor' risk?
Smith looks solid enough. Plays similar to Jack Steele. A straight ahead at the ball kind of player.
Rozee has already dominated at senior SANFL level and looks to have the physique, athleticism and tricks to make it at AFL level.
Safe to assume that 3 of King, Rankine, Smith and Rozee will be available.
We can only choose 1.
Should we go the solid looking local lad Bailey Smith or someone with X factor like Conor Rozee who might carry a 'go home factor' risk?
Smith looks solid enough. Plays similar to Jack Steele. A straight ahead at the ball kind of player.
Rozee has already dominated at senior SANFL level and looks to have the physique, athleticism and tricks to make it at AFL level.
Safe to assume that 3 of King, Rankine, Smith and Rozee will be available.
We can only choose 1.
Last edited by BenLong#21 on Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:41pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Draft: Rozee v Smith
Chances are we will get Pick 4 and Rankine is quite likely to still be available.
GC will get a compensation pick for Lynch giving them 2 & 3. Carlton have pick 1 and even if they are given a priority pick it won't be pick 2.
GC will get a compensation pick for Lynch giving them 2 & 3. Carlton have pick 1 and even if they are given a priority pick it won't be pick 2.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rozee v Smith
I am working on the theory May leaves and GC get 2, 3 & 4.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:02pm Chances are we will get Pick 4 and Rankine is quite likely to still be available.
GC will get a compensation pick for Lynch giving them 2 & 3. Carlton have pick 1 and even if they are given a priority pick it won't be pick 2.
Update:
Foxsports is reporting that the Suns are considering using pick 3 on Rozee which makes my discussion moot.
If May stays at GC - we could end up with Rankine.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-dr ... 06b29d5518
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-09-16/c ... -september
Last edited by BenLong#21 on Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:35pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
- Location: everywhere
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Draft: Rozee v Smith
Con I agree Rozee is coming along nicely , not sure he will go this high though.BenLong#21 wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:09pmI am working on the theory May leaves and GC get 2, 3 & 4.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:02pm Chances are we will get Pick 4 and Rankine is quite likely to still be available.
GC will get a compensation pick for Lynch giving them 2 & 3. Carlton have pick 1 and even if they are given a priority pick it won't be pick 2.
Update:
Foxsports is reporting that the Suns are considering using pick 3 on Rozee which makes my discussion moot.
If May stays at GC - we could end up with Rankine.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-dr ... 06b29d5518
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-08-08/c ... ide-august
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: Draft: Rozee v Smith
May leaving has no bearing on the draft. He is still under contract, meaning no compensation. It would be a trade.BenLong#21 wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:09pmI am working on the theory May leaves and GC get 2, 3 & 4.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:02pm Chances are we will get Pick 4 and Rankine is quite likely to still be available.
GC will get a compensation pick for Lynch giving them 2 & 3. Carlton have pick 1 and even if they are given a priority pick it won't be pick 2.
Update:
Foxsports is reporting that the Suns are considering using pick 3 on Rozee which makes my discussion moot.
If May stays at GC - we could end up with Rankine.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-dr ... 06b29d5518
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-08-08/c ... ide-august
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rozee v Smith
Good call.realdeal wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:28pmMay leaving has no bearing on the draft. He is still under contract, meaning no compensation. It would be a trade.BenLong#21 wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:09pmI am working on the theory May leaves and GC get 2, 3 & 4.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 4:02pm Chances are we will get Pick 4 and Rankine is quite likely to still be available.
GC will get a compensation pick for Lynch giving them 2 & 3. Carlton have pick 1 and even if they are given a priority pick it won't be pick 2.
Update:
Foxsports is reporting that the Suns are considering using pick 3 on Rozee which makes my discussion moot.
If May stays at GC - we could end up with Rankine.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-dr ... 06b29d5518
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-08-08/c ... ide-august
Ok yes I see. So pick 4 it is!
Seems like Walsh and Lukosius will be gone for sure.
Then GC will look at Rankine, King or Rozee (if you believe the foxsports article).
Three of the following 4 will be available when our pick comes along - King, Rankine, Smith and Rozee.....
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
The May thing is GC trying to con the AFL into giving them a top-5 pick because they know they aren't going to get that in trade. They're more likely looking at another late first round pick and possibly some steak knives. They know that there are people at the AFL who want to give them a priority pick and are trying to exploit that. I'll be genuinely annoyed if the AFL move our pick down any more than the expected Lynch compo.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
- Location: everywhere
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
What is unexplained is why we traded away our 2nd & 3rd picks in what is widely regarded as 2018 being a strong draft. Not sure what we have to trade without throwing the baby out with the bath water.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
who really has a clue. it's a lottery, and we aint lucky. may as well roll a die.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 768 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Not that my opinion is of any relevance but I want Rankine. Our drafting has been safe and boring so it’s time for some X-factor.
Regards May and compensation I believe the AFL won’t want the Suns to be without May and Lynch next year so they will make it obvious to the Suns that if they break May’s contract with a year to run they won’t be getting a early first round pick for both, hence we should have pick 4 after the suns get Lynch compensation
Regards May and compensation I believe the AFL won’t want the Suns to be without May and Lynch next year so they will make it obvious to the Suns that if they break May’s contract with a year to run they won’t be getting a early first round pick for both, hence we should have pick 4 after the suns get Lynch compensation
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Actually I disagree with this statement entirely.Goose is king wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 5:34pm Not that my opinion is of any relevance but I want Rankine. Our drafting has been safe and boring so it’s time for some X-factor.
Regards May and compensation I believe the AFL won’t want the Suns to be without May and Lynch next year so they will make it obvious to the Suns that if they break May’s contract with a year to run they won’t be getting a early first round pick for both, hence we should have pick 4 after the suns get Lynch compensation
Our drafting has not been safe at all and I think that has been one of our problems.
Paddy was a high risk/high return punt where Petracca was a far safer bet.
Billings was seen as a silk and X-factor player but he has not come on as well as we had hoped (I am not going to go into why because it has been done to death on here).
I think a high risk player is the last thing we need (I am opposed to trading for Hannerbery for that reason).
We cannot afford another bust and Rankine could be anything or nothing, in my opinion of course.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Dont under-sell yourself!Goose is king wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 5:34pm Not that my opinion is of any relevance but I want Rankine. Our drafting has been safe and boring so it’s time for some X-factor.
Regards May and compensation I believe the AFL won’t want the Suns to be without May and Lynch next year so they will make it obvious to the Suns that if they break May’s contract with a year to run they won’t be getting a early first round pick for both, hence we should have pick 4 after the suns get Lynch compensation
Your opinion is valid as the next blokes champ.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Billings was seen to come from a good safe and nice family with a good character.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 6:11pmActually I disagree with this statement entirely.Goose is king wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 5:34pm Not that my opinion is of any relevance but I want Rankine. Our drafting has been safe and boring so it’s time for some X-factor.
Regards May and compensation I believe the AFL won’t want the Suns to be without May and Lynch next year so they will make it obvious to the Suns that if they break May’s contract with a year to run they won’t be getting a early first round pick for both, hence we should have pick 4 after the suns get Lynch compensation
Our drafting has not been safe at all and I think that has been one of our problems.
Paddy was a high risk/high return punt where Petracca was a far safer bet.
Billings was seen as a silk and X-factor player but he has not come on as well as we had hoped (I am not going to go into why because it has been done to death on here).
I think a high risk player is the last thing we need (I am opposed to trading for Hannerbery for that reason).
We cannot afford another bust and Rankine could be anything or nothing, in my opinion of course.
I think the recruiters fell in love with his parents to be honest.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
You are right.vacuous space wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 5:02pm The May thing is GC trying to con the AFL into giving them a top-5 pick because they know they aren't going to get that in trade. They're more likely looking at another late first round pick and possibly some steak knives. They know that there are people at the AFL who want to give them a priority pick and are trying to exploit that. I'll be genuinely annoyed if the AFL move our pick down any more than the expected Lynch compo.
I had forgotten that.
Yes the theory was the GC could 'rip up' his contract to artificially make him a fee agent - so they could then manufacture pick 4 compo.
Cant see that being allowed. Would create a troubling precedent.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Is it a lottery?desertsaint wrote: ↑Sun 16 Sep 2018 5:18pm who really has a clue. it's a lottery, and we aint lucky. may as well roll a die.
If so why do all 18 clubs bother to hire and pay for recruiting staff?
Why not just read the phantom drafts published online and follow those?
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Rankine and Smith are the standouts... I think Rankine is brilliant but Smith strikes me as one of those good at everything, consistently great mids.
I want both.
I want both.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Worth nothing that SA were the best team in the U18 Champs by an absolute mile this year
http://www.afl.com.au/news/game-develop ... ogram/u18s
http://www.afl.com.au/news/game-develop ... ogram/u18s
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Must pick the best player. I think that is the golden rule. Forget nice parents, clean bedrooms and whether he likes a good night out here and there. As long as he is not 5' 9" tall or under. Just would'nt be able to handle another Lonie.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
Smith looks like a goer. Is he 'great'?
To compare:
Rankine kicked 12 goals in 4 games in the U18 champs.
Smith 3 from 4 games
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
If we get Rankine I am going to do a 180 degree from negative to positive.
Would be a good get.
Would be a good get.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
I don’t know how anyone can say it’s a strong draft. 18 year olds play against other 18 year olds. They might look good now, but what happens when they play against men?derby Street wrote:What is unexplained is why we traded away our 2nd & 3rd picks in what is widely regarded as 2018 being a strong draft. Not sure what we have to trade without throwing the baby out with the bath water.
And how well does this “strong draft” extend to picks in the 2nd and 3rd round?
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Draft: Rankine v Rozee v Smith v King
We desperately need quality midfielders so I went with Smith, but wouldnt be unhappy with Rankine.