5 years Dan Hannebery?

[longtimesaint]

I don’t mind Hannebery but not under any circumstances for pick 4

[parkeysainter]

I don’t mind Hannebery but not under any circumstances for pick 4

Very much doubt we will directly give pick 4 for him. If the Swans have to let him go due to salary cap issues and to try reinvigorate their side, then we should play hard ball a bit. A future 2nd rounder would be more reasonable IMO.

[dragit]

Halftime and big surprise slow Hanners has stunk it up in the same way he has for two seasons. Can’t get near it. Zero evidence of gut running but instead a demonstration of how he fails to get to contest after contest.
Worse, watching it with a room filled with Swans supporters all of whom of course are embarrassed but gleeful at the prospect of gettinv anything at all for him, leg alone palming off his 800k for the next three years.

Its his 2nd game back after a long lay off and he would not be completely match fit for obvious reasons. The 2nd game back is harder than the first.

If he is fit, he is easily in our best and starting midfield. End of story.

Who gives a s***... he hasn't been good for two years.

[parkeysainter]

Halftime and big surprise slow Hanners has stunk it up in the same way he has for two seasons. Can’t get near it. Zero evidence of gut running but instead a demonstration of how he fails to get to contest after contest.
Worse, watching it with a room filled with Swans supporters all of whom of course are embarrassed but gleeful at the prospect of gettinv anything at all for him, leg alone palming off his 800k for the next three years.

Its his 2nd game back after a long lay off and he would not be completely match fit for obvious reasons. The 2nd game back is harder than the first.

If he is fit, he is easily in our best and starting midfield. End of story.

Who gives a s***... he hasn't been good for two years.

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

[sendmehomehappy]

If they want to clear their 800 K salary cap by getting him out, then we take him for free, as if he is a FA.

We'd be doing the swans a big favour.

He may be short term help and leadership, but won't be around for the start of the next big push.

That won't be for at least 3 years.

[perfectionist]

What crime has Dan Hannebery committed to deserve a sentence of 5 years at the Saints?

[dragit]

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were actually on our recruitment team.

Armo @ 30 is playing better at the moment than Hannaberry has for over 2 years, but we think it's a good idea to sign him up for 5 years on 800K.

haha - get it done with our first pick saints

[dragit]

We should be offering aliir or florent the Hannebery money...

[parkeysainter]

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were actually on our recruitment team.

Armo @ 30 is playing better at the moment than Hannaberry has for over 2 years, but we think it's a good idea to sign him up for 5 years on 800K.

haha - get it done with our first pick saints

Stop making stuff up Con.

[dragit]

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were actually on our recruitment team.

Armo @ 30 is playing better at the moment than Hannaberry has for over 2 years, but we think it's a good idea to sign him up for 5 years on 800K.

haha - get it done with our first pick saints

Stop making stuff up Con.

I am sorry for accusing you of having any potential slither of significance, that was an absolutely absurd concept clearly, which I wholeheartedly retract.

[parkeysainter]

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were actually on our recruitment team.

Armo @ 30 is playing better at the moment than Hannaberry has for over 2 years, but we think it's a good idea to sign him up for 5 years on 800K.

haha - get it done with our first pick saints

Stop making stuff up Con.

I am sorry for accusing you of having any potential slither of significance, that was an absolutely absurd concept clearly, which I wholeheartedly retract.

Yes Con. Just stop making stuff up. 800k at 5 years and our 1st pick...lol

[SaintPav]

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were actually on our recruitment team.

Armo @ 30 is playing better at the moment than Hannaberry has for over 2 years, but we think it's a good idea to sign him up for 5 years on 800K.

haha - get it done with our first pick saints

Stop making stuff up Con.

I am sorry for accusing you of having any potential slither of significance, that was an absolutely absurd concept clearly, which I wholeheartedly retract.

Yes Con. Just stop making stuff up. 800k at 5 years and our 1st pick...lol

Dragit isn’t Con.

Why do you keep calling him Con?

[one point]

He's been injured. Yep. Terrible player. Only AA x 3.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were actually on our recruitment team.

Or on the payroll somewhere at the club

[Hemi Baxter]

Yes you’re right he’s towing the establishment line PS. He’s contracted at the Swans for another 3 at 800. We’ll have to wear that even if we spread it over 4 years with a “trigger”.
Why would we take the risk he can get back to his best?
Why would we view everything through the prism of his current ‘recovery’. He’s put together many sequential games in the past two years and never looked like an 800k player.
OP
Slow
Poor kick

[saintsRrising]

After another ordinary game by Hannebery this weekend I am getting nervous.

Yes up to 2016 he was stellar. The last two seasons, even allowing for injuries he seems to be back in the pack somewhat.

So if we are going to pay top $$ and even worse a high draft cost that would include our first rounder I would be quite depressed.

If it is a salary dump by the Swans and we get him for a more reasonable trade deal based on his last 2 seasons and not on his past glories then ok.

[Saintly66]

I’ll just gloss over the bitching on here for a minute, reckon just let the medicos do what they do it’s 2018 ffs St Kilda surely can’t say she’ll be right even if his body is cooked.

[parkeysainter]

I’ll just gloss over the bitching on here for a minute, reckon just let the medicos do what they do it’s 2018 ffs St Kilda surely can’t say she’ll be right even if his body is cooked.

Of course. The medicos will go over him with a fine tooth comb if the club ends up making the call in definitely wanting him.

People just make stuff up on here. To say we will just take him without due diligence and pay him 800k a year for 5 years is utter rubbish.

[Teflon]

From BF
Sydney have strong interest in Acres - I can see him going there and being a gun big bodied Kennedy mid that we just couldn’t develop.....deplorable if we allow this talent to walk

STK2020 said: ↑
Funny you bring up Acres & Sydney .
I heard today Acres & our 1st 2019 for Hanneberry and Sydney's 1st 2018 plus late swaps here and there .

[parkeysainter]

From BF
Sydney have strong interest in Acres - I can see him going there and being a gun big bodied Kennedy mid that we just couldn’t develop.....deplorable if we allow this talent to walk

STK2020 said: ↑
Funny you bring up Acres & Sydney .
I heard today Acres & our 1st 2019 for Hanneberry and Sydney's 1st 2018 plus late swaps here and there .

Don't think that will happen.

[dragit]

I'll 100% quit following the game if we trade Acres out for el chapo.

[rodgerfox]

Acres is very, very close to ordinary.

[Teflon]

From BF
Sydney have strong interest in Acres - I can see him going there and being a gun big bodied Kennedy mid that we just couldn’t develop.....deplorable if we allow this talent to walk

STK2020 said: ↑
Funny you bring up Acres & Sydney .
I heard today Acres & our 1st 2019 for Hanneberry and Sydney's 1st 2018 plus late swaps here and there .

Don't think that will happen.

Ok

[Teflon]

Acres is very, very close to ordinary.

Is he though?
Or is he simply being used in dumb positions (ruck) and just not being developed properly as a genuine big bodied mid while we keep playing Mavs of the world?

[Saint 58]

Acres is very, very close to ordinary.

Is he though?
Or is he simply being used in dumb positions (ruck) and just not being developed properly as a genuine big bodied mid while we keep playing Mavs of the world?

+1
Play him where he should be played

[degruch]

From BF
Sydney have strong interest in Acres - I can see him going there and being a gun big bodied Kennedy mid that we just couldn’t develop.....deplorable if we allow this talent to walk

STK2020 said: ↑
Funny you bring up Acres & Sydney .
I heard today Acres & our 1st 2019 for Hanneberry and Sydney's 1st 2018 plus late swaps here and there .

Don't think that will happen.

Too right...he'd have to learn how to tackle, chase, block, shepherd, tap the ball to advantage, recognise his opposition or even stand the mark before he can become anything like Kennedy!