Waite v Brown

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Waite v Brown

Post: # 1749989Post Sainter_Dad »

Brown - rest of the season and 1st of next year - 3 weeks.


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
Hack
Club Player
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat 12 May 2018 10:06pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Waite v Brown

Post: # 1749991Post Hack »

3 weeks for a bump, laughable. Game is an official joke. Inconsistencies throughout the business


SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Waite v Brown

Post: # 1749999Post SemperFidelis »

St DAC wrote:Certainly late ... no argument possible there. Didn't look like he hit Saad in the head, so can't see how it was high. But we usually get screwed royally at the tribunal, so expect a 4 week penalty.
He didn’t contest the head high impact, so there must have been no point. Contested the intentional grading instead, but failed.

Thought he spoke well. Very happy it was limited to the 3.


Always loyal
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Waite v Brown

Post: # 1750005Post Sainter_Dad »

Oh well - not really any harm done - Jarrod Waite wont be playing when we play North, so we wont need as many bigger bodies....


….

Oh wait ...


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
Viking3
Club Player
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon 04 Sep 2006 10:21am
Location: McKinnon
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Waite v Brown

Post: # 1750006Post Viking3 »

SemperFidelis wrote: Tue 14 Aug 2018 8:31pm
St DAC wrote:Certainly late ... no argument possible there. Didn't look like he hit Saad in the head, so can't see how it was high. But we usually get screwed royally at the tribunal, so expect a 4 week penalty.
He didn’t contest the head high impact, so there must have been no point. Contested the intentional grading instead, but failed.

Thought he spoke well. Very happy it was limited to the 3.
They did question the high contact but Essendon’s doctors report stated concussion and that he had a sore jaw. They threw it out immediately. Don’t even bother to check how he actually got his sore jaw. Same as always, we get screwed over. Although 3 weeks isn’t too bad.


Give me one flag & I'll go to my grave a happy man.
Post Reply