congorozides wrote: ↑Mon 11 Jun 2018 12:44am
Teflon wrote: ↑Mon 11 Jun 2018 12:34am
congorozides wrote: ↑Mon 11 Jun 2018 12:27am
I still just cant get my head around the coach extension to 2020.
Just so unnecessary. A complete brain explosion. Why not wait 6-12 months?
Seems so weird.
Was the Board on MDMA at the B & F or something?
I'm not joking. Serious question.
It's obvious
At the time "stability" from successful clubs is always lauded over us
So our knee jerk reaction, politically correct Board full of AFL apologist decided:
"Let's be strategic....(dangerous), let's get in early and extend Alan and be touted in the media as a really stable footy club going places..."
When you lack self esteem, just want the big boys to like you you'll do anything.....even make decisions with no due diligence or rational thought.
Often termed: incompetence
True. Couldnt agree more.
'Stability' was the latest buzz words in the halls of AFL group-think and pseudo corporate babble. And of course - we over invested in the latest trend word in a bid to fit in and get the pat on the head and the nod of approval from the 'industry'.
Similar to how we panicked after the Tom Boyd trade when the AFL 'industry' all believed that tall fwds were all going to be on $1m a year. That 'fear' lasted about 5 minutes.
Yep we are trend followers not setters
Even the Pride game - good on them and I'm all for everyone having equal rights ......but you just know our clubs excited cause we've got a product the "bosses at HQ" will love and nothing but feel good media coming from this one folks!
It's why the yes referendum was interesting - not because of the vote (that was always going to be yes), but from the point of view of reading the clubs responses - St Kilda were falling over themselves to be "progressive"
Carlton and Hawthorn and other bigger clubs were confident enough to say it's not necessarily a sporting vote question, it's an individual question and we are happy to leave that to individuals to decide....
Many might say that's weak, St Kilda approach much stronger......id argue in this day and age of open media and public condemnation if one doesn't agree with "general consensus", it's far more dangerous and brave to take the Hawks /Blues line than ours.....
A cautionary note: to all/any muppet who comes back suggesting I'm arguing against a yes/no stance etc please understand it's NOT the point I'm making here and irrelevant (I know some won't resist a politically correct point scoring opportunity), all I ask is that they do try and keep up!