We're on Track

[rodgerfox]

The perennial 'we will be good in two years' post.

Two years is far enough away so that it can't verified and near enough to give people hope.

Similar to the old fave - 'A.Hammil two weeks'.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=82024

[Con Gorozidis]

The perennial 'we will be good in two years' post.

Two years is far enough away so that it can't verified and near enough to give people hope.

Similar to the old fave - 'A.Hammil two weeks'.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=82024

You were right back in 2013 and you might end up right again but only if we get significant changue in Mgt.
The current crop won't get us there.

We're in a rut of their own making.

[rodgerfox]

The perennial 'we will be good in two years' post.

Two years is far enough away so that it can't verified and near enough to give people hope.

Similar to the old fave - 'A.Hammil two weeks'.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=82024

You were right back in 2013 and you might end up right again but only if we get significant changue in Mgt.
The current crop won't get us there.

We're in a rut of their own making.

My point back then, and still is, that it was always going to be a long, deep rut.

Which it is.

However as per my post back in 2013, it's not necessarily anyone's fault or failure - it was always going to be the case given the gross imbalance in our list.

It's certainly not ahead of schedule, but nothing happening now was unforeseeable.


I'm far from convinced that we're being well coached, but I don't really understand the meltdown directed at the entire club to be honest.

Better coaching, plus time to get the list balanced is really all that is required.