Tom Hickey

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727442Post thejiggingsaint »

Among all the schitt on display last night, one bit of positive news ( for me at least) was the performance of Tom Hickey. The much maligned former no 1 ruckman gave Sandilands a darn good contest.


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727443Post SydneySainter »

Agreed. Making opposition rucks at least earn their possessions. Worth persevering with!


Bad management is bad management
thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727447Post thejiggingsaint »

SydneySainter wrote:Agreed. Making opposition rucks at least earn their possessions. Worth persevering with!
I have to confess that I’m chuffed to see Tom coming good.


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727465Post bigcarl »

Longer is more physical and can play enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
Last edited by bigcarl on Sun 13 May 2018 7:22pm, edited 1 time in total.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727467Post thejiggingsaint »

bigcarl wrote:Longer is more physical and can okay enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
Why not be bold..... play’em BOTH!


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727470Post SydneySainter »

thejiggingsaint wrote:
SydneySainter wrote:Agreed. Making opposition rucks at least earn their possessions. Worth persevering with!
I have to confess that I’m chuffed to see Tom coming good.
Like wise, always had faith in him.


Bad management is bad management
wally
Club Player
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727479Post wally »

I agree they should both be playing, let's face it Mason Cox gives Coll something and both these blokes are better
than him.Our current set-up needs something, anything.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727481Post thejiggingsaint »

wally wrote:I agree they should both be playing, let's face it Mason Cox gives Coll something and both these blokes are better
than him.Our current set-up needs something, anything.
+1


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11354
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1349 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727485Post Sainternist »

Good to see big Chewie Hickey find some form lately.

Not sure if playing Longer is in our interests, unless Hickey gets injured. After this year, Longer's career in AFL will be done and dusted.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 857
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727486Post realdeal »

thejiggingsaint wrote:
bigcarl wrote:Longer is more physical and can okay enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
Why not be bold..... play’em BOTH!
Longer played crap in the Seniors, he's now playing crap for Sandy.

We need to keep going with Marshall as the back-up.


User avatar
The Recruit
Club Player
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727488Post The Recruit »

Longer is not an AFL footballer
Hickey is so much better


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727491Post The_Dud »

Where’s Stonecold’s input? How’d Longer go in the 2s today?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7936
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 549 times
Been thanked: 254 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727496Post bobmurray »

realdeal wrote:
thejiggingsaint wrote:
bigcarl wrote:Longer is more physical and can okay enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
Why not be bold..... play’em BOTH!
Longer played crap in the Seniors, he's now playing crap for Sandy.

We need to keep going with Marshall as the back-up.
Based on the above post, can we delist or trade Longer at seasons end, we have more "spuds" on our list than any other club, we'll never get anywhere untill
we have a cull and draft or trade in talented players.

I'm over the shite St Kilda and Sandy dish up. Surely the club isn't going to run with same coaches players and staff in 2019.
:roll:


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727497Post stonecold »

Three games in a row Tom's direct opponent in top 3 best players for their respective club's, (including last two opponents in Coaches votes and Sandilands will make it 3, in 3 games)!!!!!

You are getting carried away by some cheap around the ground possies!!!!!

Have a look at Sandilands toy and dominate centre bounces last night, resulted in many Freo goals!!!!!

Tom continues to refuse to defend and let's he's direct opponent have a massive influence!!!!!

He has lots of work to do!!!!!

Many of you are undereducated at the true art of ruck work!!!!!

All the best to you though, you opinions are welcome and valued, somewhere!!!!! ;)


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727499Post stonecold »

The Recruit wrote:Longer is not an AFL footballer
Hickey is so much better


Hickey's opponent in best 3 again for their respective club, 3 games in a row now, if that's good for saints footy, that explains why are so s***!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727501Post stonecold »

The_Dud wrote:Where’s Stonecold’s input? How’d Longer go in the 2s today?
There's your input, straight from the opposition and coaches!!!!!


Sandilands smashed Tom last night, end of story, don't kid yourselves!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727507Post saynta »

thejiggingsaint wrote:Among all the schitt on display last night, one bit of positive news ( for me at least) was the performance of Tom Hickey. The much maligned former no 1 ruckman gave Sandilands a darn good contest.
Love Hickey's endeavour.

He, along with Webster, Marshall, Long, Coffield and Brown all try their hearts out each week


Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727519Post Stephen Theodore »

Have to agree with stoneCold here, I thought Sandilands gave his midfielders an arm chair ride. Hickey is good aerobically, ran and picked up possessions, but for pure ruck work he got flogged.


Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727520Post Stephen Theodore »

Have to agree with stoneCold here, I thought Sandilands gave his midfielders an arm chair ride. Hickey is good aerobicall, ran and picked up possessions, but for pure ruck work he got flogged.


Superboot
SS Life Member
Posts: 2509
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 9:11pm
Location: Behind the goal, South Road end
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727530Post Superboot »

We don’t have a complete ruckman.

Tom gets beaten at the bounces and gives away stupid frees at the worst possible time (viz. against North last year) but is quite useful around the ground.

Longer is more competitive at the bounces but completely and utterly useless around the ground

We don’t have Michael Gardiner. Wish to hell we did.

Oh, and I’ll never forget the day Jason Blake beat Sandilands in Tassie.


User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727532Post SydneySainter »

bigcarl wrote:Longer is more physical and can play enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
I know that Longer’s strengths are supposed to be his big frame and contest in the hitout, but when he’s beaten in that department, we really are playing a man down, as per round 1 and 2.


Bad management is bad management
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727545Post bigcarl »

SydneySainter wrote:
bigcarl wrote:Longer is more physical and can play enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
I know that Longer’s strengths are supposed to be his big frame and contest in the hitout, but when he’s beaten in that department, we really are playing a man down, as per round 1 and 2.
If you combined them you’d have a complete ruckman. I can see Hickey developing in the ruck duels. Not so sure about Billy being able to develop ability around the ground.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727546Post bigcarl »

SydneySainter wrote:
bigcarl wrote:Longer is more physical and can play enforcer more, I guess, but as a pure footballer I’ve always rated Hickey higher
I know that Longer’s strengths are supposed to be his big frame and contest in the hitout, but when he’s beaten in that department, we really are playing a man down, as per round 1 and 2.
If you combined them you’d have a complete ruckman. I can see Hickey developing in the ruck duels. Not so sure Billy has the same scope for improvement around the ground.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727553Post Joffa Burns »

Must have been watching a different match than most of you.
I thought Hickey got slaughtered by Sandilands.
He was ok around the ground but smashed in the center bounces and ball ups.
He fared better at the boundary throw ins.

I disagree with Stoney on defense, I think Hickey defends his man far better when the opposition ruck runs forward than Longer ever has.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Tom Hickey

Post: # 1727563Post Teflon »

Joffa Burns wrote:Must have been watching a different match than most of you.
I thought Hickey got slaughtered by Sandilands.
He was ok around the ground but smashed in the center bounces and ball ups.
He fared better at the boundary throw ins.

I disagree with Stoney on defense, I think Hickey defends his man far better when the opposition ruck runs forward than Longer ever has.
Agree re defence
At least Hickey goes forward and can jag a goal and has a second effort at ground level longer has none of that
I'm not even that convinced the hit outs always culminate in clear mid advantage often times (some yes but they're not as prevalent as you'd think for mine as sides know how to pick these off)
I certainly didn't think Hickey was our worst that's for sure


“Yeah….nah””
Post Reply