Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
One thing I’m utterly utterly sick of (Minus our goal kicking), is the fact that we have yet to solve our ruck dilemma over the last few years.
We’ve had Hickey who has at times looked great around the grounds to the point of being a weapon, and at best serviceable in the centre.
We’ve had Longer who at times has been a beast in the middle, and blocking apparently, but is lucky to have 5 touches a game otherwise
Neither have been remotely good enough to play a key position meaning that it’s been impossible to play them together.
In one of the more condemning observation of our strategic team, in three years our solution to this has been to play Bruce in the ruck who has been smashed there and this has coincided with his fall from grace as a forward.
We then tried Sam Gilbert and in fairness, Gilbo had a spike in form for a half a season though we still got beaten in the ruck.
Now our genius strategy has been to play Acres there, which is ironically as close the the centre as he’s been so far. And he’s being ‘managed’ now.
The closest we’ve come to an actual, viable solution is Marshall... he’s looked good in the middle and plays key forward at Sandy.
Surely, with Bruce out, Membrey struggling, no back up ruck, this kid who is neither ready to be the main forward or ruck, plays the inbetween/back up role for both positions with one of Hickey or Longer.
We’ve had Hickey who has at times looked great around the grounds to the point of being a weapon, and at best serviceable in the centre.
We’ve had Longer who at times has been a beast in the middle, and blocking apparently, but is lucky to have 5 touches a game otherwise
Neither have been remotely good enough to play a key position meaning that it’s been impossible to play them together.
In one of the more condemning observation of our strategic team, in three years our solution to this has been to play Bruce in the ruck who has been smashed there and this has coincided with his fall from grace as a forward.
We then tried Sam Gilbert and in fairness, Gilbo had a spike in form for a half a season though we still got beaten in the ruck.
Now our genius strategy has been to play Acres there, which is ironically as close the the centre as he’s been so far. And he’s being ‘managed’ now.
The closest we’ve come to an actual, viable solution is Marshall... he’s looked good in the middle and plays key forward at Sandy.
Surely, with Bruce out, Membrey struggling, no back up ruck, this kid who is neither ready to be the main forward or ruck, plays the inbetween/back up role for both positions with one of Hickey or Longer.
Last edited by skeptic on Thu 03 May 2018 11:47pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
+1
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Was only out because he was knocked out
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Playing Marshall for one game before retreating for the safety of Hickey was such a Richo move. It should have been Battle coming in for Bruce, but somehow Richo manages to find a way to make two disappointing moves with one change. I'd love to see Marshall out there on Sunday, but I'm guessing it'll be a mid in for Acres. Probably Armitage. I find that incredible after the effort the team put in last week. Given our start, you'd think we'd be making some forward thinking decisions, especially since Richo's contract means he's basically under zero pressure to win now.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
In principle he should play but… if he has a few ordinary games then he'll need to go back and re-form in the VFL.
Pierce is worth another look at AFL level if his recent VFL form is anything to go by.
Pierce is worth another look at AFL level if his recent VFL form is anything to go by.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
saintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
because there was obviously still a little concern=- it's how Concussion is now treated
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
FFSsaintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
WTF?degruch wrote:FFSsaintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
He was available for selection wasn’t he??
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Just like Newnes I guess who was concussed and then played the following week. I thought it was an automatic one week rest of you got concussion in a gamesaintbrat wrote:saintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
because there was obviously still a little concern=- it's how Concussion is now treated
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Dempster, McCartin, Stevens...you'd expect a young player has a couple good game, gets KO'd, would be rushed back in after a concussion given our recent run of injuries? If he changed his name to Newnes he'd be lucky enough to play injured?saintspremiers wrote:WTF?degruch wrote:FFSsaintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
He was available for selection wasn’t he??
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5132
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1458 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
To the question, yes. Marshall is the future and won't get going if he is shuffled from As to rest to Bs. A star turn like Acres in ruck is so silly. There are plenty of less skilled work horses to choose e.g. Membrey. Even the management of Blake was half bottomed, one game too late apparently and he played in wet slippery conditions against guys well out of his weight division. The selection judgement is poor unless they are contractually bound to play certain players regardless of form. If so that should be on the table. Anyway dry day, fast track Paddy and the delicious (French for gun) Billings will be on song. Get it to them even if we have to use the flying wedge technique.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3712 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
I only want 1 ruckman in the team on most weeks, and at the moment it is Hickey for me, but I like the look of Marshall and perhaps the 2 together should be tried for a few weeks. In any case I'd rather 1 only and the second guy would not be Bruce or Acres or Gilbo imo. The answer is pretty f***** obvious and staring us all in the face but our coach/coaches are too stupid to realise.
Who is the tallest bloke on our list apart from the guys who are picked to play ruck and who usually play in the ruck when their named in the team? Derrr? Why play Gilbo or Acres when we've got a guy called Jake Carlisle who is nearly 100kg and nearly 200cm?
Carlisle plays as the loose most of the time, with Gilbo taking one of the tall forwards and Nathan Brown playing on the biggest or sometimes the slowest tall forward. If Carlisle is basically there in the backline to intercept that high ball coming in, there's not going to be many high balls from a stoppage deep in your defensive line, so why not get Carlisle rucking when it's down their in that territory.
Carlisle should also be covering the resting Gawn and would probably do a better job than either Marshall or Hickey when it comes to being the defender on that last line. He doesn't have to do much rucking and hopefully if our mids are winning clearances it'll only be as a chop out for Hickey or Marshall.
We can then use the guys like Acres to crash through the stoppages at speed and create opportnities to break the lines. Same with Gilbo. If his opponent is on the bench he can pinch hit in the middle. Sam has the ability to be a very good tagger/follower and he can also win his own ball.
Who is the tallest bloke on our list apart from the guys who are picked to play ruck and who usually play in the ruck when their named in the team? Derrr? Why play Gilbo or Acres when we've got a guy called Jake Carlisle who is nearly 100kg and nearly 200cm?
Carlisle plays as the loose most of the time, with Gilbo taking one of the tall forwards and Nathan Brown playing on the biggest or sometimes the slowest tall forward. If Carlisle is basically there in the backline to intercept that high ball coming in, there's not going to be many high balls from a stoppage deep in your defensive line, so why not get Carlisle rucking when it's down their in that territory.
Carlisle should also be covering the resting Gawn and would probably do a better job than either Marshall or Hickey when it comes to being the defender on that last line. He doesn't have to do much rucking and hopefully if our mids are winning clearances it'll only be as a chop out for Hickey or Marshall.
We can then use the guys like Acres to crash through the stoppages at speed and create opportnities to break the lines. Same with Gilbo. If his opponent is on the bench he can pinch hit in the middle. Sam has the ability to be a very good tagger/follower and he can also win his own ball.
Last edited by Scollop on Fri 04 May 2018 10:46pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6092
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Carlisle's previous shoulder, groin, knee, hip and back injuries hamper his ability to contest in the ruck. The bombers wouldnt listen and persisted playing him there.Scollop wrote:I only want 1 ruckman in the team on most weeks, and at the moment it is Hickey for me, but I like the look of Marshall and perhaps the 2 together should be tried for a few weeks. In any case I'd rather 1 only and the second guy would not be Bruce or Acres or Gilbo imo. The answer is pretty f***** obvious and staring us all in the face but our coach/coaches are too stupid to realise.
Who is the tallest bloke on our list apart from the guys who are picked to play ruck and who usually play in the ruck when their named in the team? Derrr? Why play Gilbo or Acres when we've got a guy called Jake Carlisle who is nearly 100kg and nearly 200cm?
Carlisle plays as the loose most of the time, with Gilbo taking one of the tall forwards and Nathan Brown playing on the biggest or sometimes the slowest tall forward. If Carlisle is basically there in the backline to intercept that high ball coming in, there's not going to be many high balls from a stoppage deep in your defensive line, so why not get Carlisle rucking when it's down their in that territory.
Carlisle should also be covering the resting Gawn and would probably do a better job than either Marshall or Hickey when it comes to being the defender on that last line. He doesn't have to do much rucking and hopefully if our mids are winning clearances it'll only be as a chop out for Hickey or Marshall.
We can then use the guys like Acres to crash through the stoppages at speed and create opportnities to break the lines. Same with Gilbo. If his opponent is on the bench he can pinch hit in the middle. Sam has the ability to be a very good tagger/follower and he can also win his own ball.
Marshall is untried as a forward in the ones and has impressed with his few games in the ruck. He has also done a decent job as forward at Sandy.
Membrey is not a key forward and never should be.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
are you a Doctor or a concussion expert, or just another whiny, sky is falling, woe is me like Con?saintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
Re: Surely Marshall has to stay in the best 22 from now on
Well...you thought wrong. Concussion, like any other injury, is dealt with on a player by player basis...sheesh. Just put a little more thought into you say...with a little less whining...you might enjoy life more.saintspremiers wrote:Just like Newnes I guess who was concussed and then played the following week. I thought it was an automatic one week rest of you got concussion in a gamesaintbrat wrote:saintspremiers wrote:Didn’t he miss the GWS game due to that?saintbrat wrote:Was only out because he was knocked out
If that was so, then why wasn’t he selected vs Hawthorn is the issue??
Probably should change his name to Newnes.
because there was obviously still a little concern=- it's how Concussion is now treated