Trout reviews our draft picks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- parkeysainter
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
- Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Trout reviews our draft picks
http://m.saints.com.au/news/2017-11-27/ ... .mobileapp
Good job Trout and Co. Have to give it to them on some fine selections. A grade performance IMO, the best of the Richo era and better than the year we jagged Billings, Dunstan and Acres.
Good job Trout and Co. Have to give it to them on some fine selections. A grade performance IMO, the best of the Richo era and better than the year we jagged Billings, Dunstan and Acres.
Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
Stick with the chickenschook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- parkeysainter
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
- Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
I was more relating to draft day alone. I would be very suprised if Clark and Coffield and even Calavino don't make the grade.chook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
you would know about the "poulets" going by your avatar.......magnifisaint wrote:Stick with the chickenschook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
saint4life
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
I'm a big believer in taking bets available talent at your pick and it certainly appears we have done so this draft.
Very excited at what the talent of Clark & Coffield bring and love the Claravino pick as he could develop to be the best of the bunch with those hands and his ability to take the intercept mark (JC mark II).
I also like that all of the mid sized players have pace and good footskills on their CV.
I will however make one point, all media experts and draft experts and player profiles refer to our picks as defenders who will move to midfield in time or defender recently turned mid in Clark. The only person referring to them as mids and not mid/defenders or defenders is Trout.
Now maybe Trout knows something no-one else knows, but it is this a little bit of spin from Trout? I'm guessing yes!
I'm more than happy that these guys were the best talent available, good kicks and good speed and will transform to mids over the next 3-4 years.
Very excited at what the talent of Clark & Coffield bring and love the Claravino pick as he could develop to be the best of the bunch with those hands and his ability to take the intercept mark (JC mark II).
I also like that all of the mid sized players have pace and good footskills on their CV.
I will however make one point, all media experts and draft experts and player profiles refer to our picks as defenders who will move to midfield in time or defender recently turned mid in Clark. The only person referring to them as mids and not mid/defenders or defenders is Trout.
Now maybe Trout knows something no-one else knows, but it is this a little bit of spin from Trout? I'm guessing yes!
I'm more than happy that these guys were the best talent available, good kicks and good speed and will transform to mids over the next 3-4 years.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
Love "feeding the chooks"chook23 wrote:you would know about the "poulets" going by your avatar.......magnifisaint wrote:Stick with the chickenschook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
Because they are all elite, all these guys played midfield as juniors. At TAC level there aren't enough positions to play midfield so they play as attacking defenders.Joffa Burns wrote:I'm a big believer in taking bets available talent at your pick and it certainly appears we have done so this draft.
Very excited at what the talent of Clark & Coffield bring and love the Claravino pick as he could develop to be the best of the bunch with those hands and his ability to take the intercept mark (JC mark II).
I also like that all of the mid sized players have pace and good footskills on their CV.
I will however make one point, all media experts and draft experts and player profiles refer to our picks as defenders who will move to midfield in time or defender recently turned mid in Clark. The only person referring to them as mids and not mid/defenders or defenders is Trout.
Now maybe Trout knows something no-one else knows, but it is this a little bit of spin from Trout? I'm guessing yes!
I'm more than happy that these guys were the best talent available, good kicks and good speed and will transform to mids over the next 3-4 years.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
Yep, we have picked some very good prospects.
Problem is so did 17 other rival teams.
You need to outperform those other 17 rivals regularly if you want to win a premiership.
Otherwise you are simply treading water.
Problem is so did 17 other rival teams.
You need to outperform those other 17 rivals regularly if you want to win a premiership.
Otherwise you are simply treading water.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
Nothing wrong with attacking defenders with skill sets - think Collingwood and the unstoppable run and rebound of Shaw, Thomas and Harry O' Brien in 2010 and 2011. Something to aim for, anyway - if they remain defenders.
The good thing is they all appear to have (from all reports) good defensive traits (intercept marking, etc) as well, in their repertoire.
The good thing is they all appear to have (from all reports) good defensive traits (intercept marking, etc) as well, in their repertoire.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri 10 Jul 2015 4:47am
- Location: Toowong Private, Ward 66.
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
I'm disappointed. Don't know (or care) if he can play. I just want him on our list!!! Irving Mosquito.
Since when does a trout pass up on a mosquito???
Since when does a trout pass up on a mosquito???
Cute but psycho. Things even out.
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
I'd have selected Nathan Murphy and hoped Clavarino stuck around until our next pick.
Quite happy with Clavarino - he looks a really good prospect - but I suspect he would have been available at 46 given the impressive amount of talent available between those two picks.
If Clavarino had gone, I'd have taken dual All-Australian Sam Hayes over Ben Paton (I don't think Lewis Pearce will ever make it) because it seems to take 4-5 years to develop ruckmen these days and by the time he's ready, he'll be able to replace Longer/Hickey.
Hayes looked unbelievable value to me as a long-term prospect.
Still, Clavarino is a solid pick and Paton offers some run and dash. Just not sure we needed another of his type.
Quite happy with Clavarino - he looks a really good prospect - but I suspect he would have been available at 46 given the impressive amount of talent available between those two picks.
If Clavarino had gone, I'd have taken dual All-Australian Sam Hayes over Ben Paton (I don't think Lewis Pearce will ever make it) because it seems to take 4-5 years to develop ruckmen these days and by the time he's ready, he'll be able to replace Longer/Hickey.
Hayes looked unbelievable value to me as a long-term prospect.
Still, Clavarino is a solid pick and Paton offers some run and dash. Just not sure we needed another of his type.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
As AR would say, "Pleasing". Clark, Coffield and Clavarino. The three Cs. Great pickups. At the risk of trotting out the old cliche, I can't believe Clavarino slipped that far. I reckon he's going to be a beauty.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Trout reviews our draft picks
Not a single Jack or Jake or Jade. A wasted draft.
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"