Jaxons views on draft
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
I just don’t get the Bonar hype.
I’m not opposed to taking him but he’s consistently rated outside the top 12 sometimes 15 not because of injury concerns but due to the fact that that many more players have consistently played better football then him.
He’s the very definition of a risk... draft a player based on the fact that he has shown less than everyone else of the same experience with the hope that he will show more... just don’t want make sense to me
I’m not opposed to taking him but he’s consistently rated outside the top 12 sometimes 15 not because of injury concerns but due to the fact that that many more players have consistently played better football then him.
He’s the very definition of a risk... draft a player based on the fact that he has shown less than everyone else of the same experience with the hope that he will show more... just don’t want make sense to me
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
I can't get this funny quirky song out of my head, from the 80's,saynta wrote:Enrico_Misso wrote:Does Ricky's rating system also apply to selecting schoolgirls?Gershwin wrote:Ricky Nixon says:
"On the confidential ratings system I’ve used for 25 years Jaidyn Stephenson is 5th of first 20"
sung by a group of teens- "Musical Youth"
"Pass the Dutchie"
(apparently a 'dutchie' is a Jamaican cooking pot
and obviously Dutchie and Duthie are grammatically similar;
I don't think porridge is a normal West Indian staple, however)
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=pass ... e&ie=UTF-8
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2011 5:22pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Forgive the capitals and the fact that at least one poster has already made the point but the very strong likelihood is that Stephenson SIMPLY WON"T BE THERE AT PICK 7.
There is just so much wish fulfillment in draft projections. For example now that North Melbourne have done absolutely everything they can to let the world know that they will not be taking Fogarty, for some reason, there is a suggestion that Collingwood will take Fogarty. There is no objective basis for this at all. Stephenson's manager Paul Connors, his TAC coaches and even his mum have appeared at Collingwood or with their denizens in the past few days. If he's there at 6 Collingwood will probably pick him up. 'Probably',because as I know a little but not everything I'm happy to admit that, today, Collingwood may receive information suggesting that Stephenson may not be able to play without medication which could inhibit his training. Doubtless Coffield will come into consideration in that case.
There is just so much wish fulfillment in draft projections. For example now that North Melbourne have done absolutely everything they can to let the world know that they will not be taking Fogarty, for some reason, there is a suggestion that Collingwood will take Fogarty. There is no objective basis for this at all. Stephenson's manager Paul Connors, his TAC coaches and even his mum have appeared at Collingwood or with their denizens in the past few days. If he's there at 6 Collingwood will probably pick him up. 'Probably',because as I know a little but not everything I'm happy to admit that, today, Collingwood may receive information suggesting that Stephenson may not be able to play without medication which could inhibit his training. Doubtless Coffield will come into consideration in that case.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
And probably not...
Higgins - very very tough on the bloke I know, but he's just too small. Would end up another Lonie. (And yep, I know he's actually bigger than Lonie.) The trend is towards bigger, stronger mids, and that makes sense to me.
Too small mate, really?? I know you can google short afl players etc and find out that at 178cm he is far from the smallest. And calling him Lonie, well that's just mean. He has the best stats of all draftees and is so professional already. He will work harder than any other draftee to make it and make it he will. Draft an outside mid with the other pick, hopefully a slider, and play him as a small forward. I'll go one further give him #44 (Mav can get another number). Imagine seeing that number snapping goals again
And FYI Milne was only 176cm tall
Higgins - very very tough on the bloke I know, but he's just too small. Would end up another Lonie. (And yep, I know he's actually bigger than Lonie.) The trend is towards bigger, stronger mids, and that makes sense to me.
Too small mate, really?? I know you can google short afl players etc and find out that at 178cm he is far from the smallest. And calling him Lonie, well that's just mean. He has the best stats of all draftees and is so professional already. He will work harder than any other draftee to make it and make it he will. Draft an outside mid with the other pick, hopefully a slider, and play him as a small forward. I'll go one further give him #44 (Mav can get another number). Imagine seeing that number snapping goals again
And FYI Milne was only 176cm tall
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
hmmmm.
Bonar is a monster. Dead set he looks like he could make Nat Fyfe look like a weakling after a couple of years in the AFL system.
Two...TWO ACL's at that age is no minor issue. Massive risk. No doubt he would be a #1 prospect however if he didn't have that cloud hanging over him. Will get senior footy in his first season IMO.
Coffield can kick and he is pretty clean. When I say he can kick I mean he is a gun by foot.
Hunter Clark could be a big bodied mid much like Acres but with much, much more inside ability.
I cant see either of them playing senior AFL in 2018
Bonar is a monster. Dead set he looks like he could make Nat Fyfe look like a weakling after a couple of years in the AFL system.
Two...TWO ACL's at that age is no minor issue. Massive risk. No doubt he would be a #1 prospect however if he didn't have that cloud hanging over him. Will get senior footy in his first season IMO.
Coffield can kick and he is pretty clean. When I say he can kick I mean he is a gun by foot.
Hunter Clark could be a big bodied mid much like Acres but with much, much more inside ability.
I cant see either of them playing senior AFL in 2018
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
- Location: NE Victoria
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 283 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Fine with me. Two quality midfielders.jaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
summertime and the living is easy ........
- spiral3
- Club Player
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:37pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
happy with this, only query I have is Coffield's contested sidejaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
but big ticks for pace, height, versatility, evasion, smarts and kicking
Clark am very happy with, by all reports transitioned well into midfield in second half of year
tough, good mover and good dual sided kick
we don't need to gamble - let's see if it happens....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Which was AFTER Cal Twomey's phantom draft.SuperDuper wrote:thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
- Location: NE Victoria
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 283 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Many other phantom drafts. Give credit where credit is due.Con Gorozidis wrote:Which was AFTER Cal Twomey's phantom draft.SuperDuper wrote:thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
summertime and the living is easy ........
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:47pm
- Location: hobart
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Thanks and congrats. On the money. Bit disappointed the ones I punted on went at 5 and 6.jaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Clearly jaxons had inside mail.Gershwin wrote:Many other phantom drafts. Give credit where credit is due.Con Gorozidis wrote:Which was AFTER Cal Twomey's phantom draft.SuperDuper wrote:thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
Clearly CT had the same inside mail.
Credit to both.
I am the only bloke on here actually pleased with our picks.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
perhaps Jaxons and CTCon Gorozidis wrote:Clearly jaxons had inside mail.Gershwin wrote:Many other phantom drafts. Give credit where credit is due.Con Gorozidis wrote:Which was AFTER Cal Twomey's phantom draft.SuperDuper wrote:thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
Clearly CT had the same inside mail.
Credit to both.
I am the only bloke on here actually pleased with our picks.
have adjoining offices or cubicles (not the loo type!!)
at Seaford.
Or they get together over the water cooler
or in the staff kitchen
any time someone brings in some tuna for lunch and sticks it in the cupboard, these 2 chuck it in the bin
because anything fishy has to be purged.
Due to ill-feeling over that Trout person.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 793 times
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Coffield vision looks really good, excellent skills and vision and keeps his feet in a tackle.
Not 100% sold on Clarke, disposal looked a bit sloppy but will see how he goes in action.
Not 100% sold on Clarke, disposal looked a bit sloppy but will see how he goes in action.
- avid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Tue 11 Mar 2008 1:54am
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Two hugely promising players.
But I would have liked to have taken Bonar
Hunter Clarke and Aiden Bonar -- mates from Stingrays -- would have been a brilliant and dynamic story. and eventual midfield.
Would have been more to Jaxon's liking too.
Thanks for the heads-up Jaxons!
Love your work. Welcome back.
But I would have liked to have taken Bonar
Hunter Clarke and Aiden Bonar -- mates from Stingrays -- would have been a brilliant and dynamic story. and eventual midfield.
Would have been more to Jaxon's liking too.
Thanks for the heads-up Jaxons!
Love your work. Welcome back.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Yeah that first vid I posted wasn’t great but check out the other 2... not as bad as u might think.shrodes wrote:Coffield vision looks really good, excellent skills and vision and keeps his feet in a tackle.
Not 100% sold on Clarke, disposal looked a bit sloppy but will see how he goes in action.
I don’t think he’s elite with his disposal (as in eye of the needle) but more the type that picks good options and generally kicks it to his team mates advantage
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Clark is a god darn star in my eyes.
Smooth mover.
Im pleased with that we got. Both these two lads are oozing class, composure and pace and can kick it. Exactly what we want.
Smooth mover.
Im pleased with that we got. Both these two lads are oozing class, composure and pace and can kick it. Exactly what we want.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
I didn’t spend a lot of time looking at home but really like what I see nowCon Gorozidis wrote:Clark is a god darn star in my eyes.
Smooth mover.
Im pleased with that we got. Both these two lads are oozing class, composure and pace and can kick it. Exactly what we want.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
What are you on about Con? Twoomey didn't pick either of those two at 7 and 8.Con Gorozidis wrote:Which was AFTER Cal Twomey's phantom draft.SuperDuper wrote:thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=94298
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- parkeysainter
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
- Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Twomey's late mail draft was spot on for pick 7 and 8.Jacks Back wrote:What are you on about Con? Twoomey didn't pick either of those two at 7 and 8.Con Gorozidis wrote:Which was AFTER Cal Twomey's phantom draft.SuperDuper wrote:thanx Jax... as usual your early call at start of thread was spot onjaxons wrote:Confirming we are taking Clark and Coffield.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=94298
Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jaxons views on draft
Yeah he did. 51 hours ago.Jacks Back wrote: What are you on about Con? Twoomey didn't pick either of those two at 7 and 8.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=94298
It is a little confusing because he does a 'ranking' and then he does his phantom draft two days before the draft.Callum Twomey's 2017 Phantom Draft
Callum Twomey November 22, 2017 7:40 PM
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-11-22/c ... ntom-draft