Naw...feeling left out, are we? I think the fact this thread was even started was poor form, amongst all the bleating on the other asking Jaxons to come back and post, it's this one that would probably more cringeworthy. Anyways, your input is even more reason to shut it down, SuperDuffer.SuperDuper wrote:No.. this is a thread to keep muppets like you out of the other thread... Yet instead if using it you want to draw attention to yourself so you go to the inappropriate thread.degruch wrote:I got slapped on the wrist for (rightly) potting a poster a few months back, yet there's effectively a whole thread for it here...
...mods awake? This is BS.
the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened ones
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
, Cringe worthy!!!!...you are spot on there. The bleatings actually make my skin crawl.degruch wrote:Naw...feeling left out, are we? I think the fact this thread was even started was poor form, amongst all the bleating on the other asking Jaxons to come back and post, it's this one that would probably more cringeworthy. Anyways, your input is even more reason to shut it down, SuperDuffer.SuperDuper wrote:No.. this is a thread to keep muppets like you out of the other thread... Yet instead if using it you want to draw attention to yourself so you go to the inappropriate thread.degruch wrote:I got slapped on the wrist for (rightly) potting a poster a few months back, yet there's effectively a whole thread for it here...
...mods awake? This is BS.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
CQ saint's predictions have been as accurate, or even more so than Jaxons'. Where's all the love for him? Just sayin'.......
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Teflon wrote:It's overrated trust me...The Fireman wrote:I wish I was famous here on SS.
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
get Barks back here
then this possie of posers perverts and pillpoppers will know TrueFame
koolaide kanarys , the lot of em
then this possie of posers perverts and pillpoppers will know TrueFame
koolaide kanarys , the lot of em
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Good idea. I'll roast an ox.asiu wrote:get Barks back here
then this possie of posers perverts and pillpoppers will know TrueFame
koolaide kanarys , the lot of em
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Appeal to authority fallacy..
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Mayhem Master
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
This thread is fake news! The jaxons haters, I call them anarchists. Because, believe me, we have plenty of anarchists. They don't want to talk about the anarchists. I condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence. It has no place in Saintsational, believe me. And yes, by the way - and yes, by the way, they are trying to take away our history and our heritage. You see that. #makingfakenewsgrateagainbelievemefolks
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Drake Huggins wrote:CQ saint's predictions have been as accurate, or even more so than Jaxons'. Where's all the love for him? Just sayin'.......
You mean that the one that CQ SAINT stated was from Jaxons?
CQ SAINT wrote: Confirmed by Jaxons. I was having an educated guess based on evidence from media. Also saw alot of social media which suggests he may be out of favour after being thrown a bone late in the season and not performing too well and late form at Port Magpies slipped away as well. Was also believing he has been in our sites for a while.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Rix Rox Rux.asiu wrote:get Barks back here
then this possie of posers perverts and pillpoppers will know TrueFame
koolaide kanarys , the lot of em
This board is poorer for his absence.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one
Happy to move on Jaxons...
Unless your there I would not 100% know but I was told we threw Armitage'a name up for a straight swap and were quickly dismissed but take on board what you say and it's irrelevant now anyway.
I will say re Dunstan( our initial debate) that after 3 demotions last year my fears for him seemed to come to fruition but his comeback the last month gives me great hope for him. You did mention his great character and he showed that after struggling at one stage. I hope goes on with it next year.. we need all our young boys to take the next step.[/quote]
Dunstan will be a jet trust me.
Think of some Aussie cricketers who made the Test side early on talent then got dropped and came back after some shield games and then became stars.
Dunstan had a few issues this year that affected his form and then lost some confidence.
He started to show his real talent at the end of the year and I expect him to be a star for many years.[/quote]
I agree totally on Dunstan. Said similar things on Facebook when many were criticizing him. Late in the season showed his true form.
Unless your there I would not 100% know but I was told we threw Armitage'a name up for a straight swap and were quickly dismissed but take on board what you say and it's irrelevant now anyway.
I will say re Dunstan( our initial debate) that after 3 demotions last year my fears for him seemed to come to fruition but his comeback the last month gives me great hope for him. You did mention his great character and he showed that after struggling at one stage. I hope goes on with it next year.. we need all our young boys to take the next step.[/quote]
Dunstan will be a jet trust me.
Think of some Aussie cricketers who made the Test side early on talent then got dropped and came back after some shield games and then became stars.
Dunstan had a few issues this year that affected his form and then lost some confidence.
He started to show his real talent at the end of the year and I expect him to be a star for many years.[/quote]
I agree totally on Dunstan. Said similar things on Facebook when many were criticizing him. Late in the season showed his true form.
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency