Logan Austin

[kosifantutti]

Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.

One of our own posters did..

Why is Jaxons not “one of our own”?

[parkeysainter]

Its on AFL website. He has officially requested a trade to the Saints and is good mates with Jack Steele.

This trade will slide through easily and early.

[DJ Higgins]

http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... gan-AUSTIN

says it all. Doesn't stand out at SAFL and not good enough for powers top 22. Only get him if it really cheap and as a back up player for injured players. I would rather not get another list clogger

[SaintPav]

Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.

One of our own posters did..

Jaxons is one of our own posters.

He is indeed

[Drake Huggins]

Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.

One of our own posters did..

Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.

Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.

Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.

Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........

Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!

[saint-stu]

I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.

It was a bloody good guess, but it absolutely was not out of left field. Jaxons gave a very good hint which narrowed it down to a small number of defenders at port. CQS guessed it (great guess, much credit), but Jaxons confirmed it immediately.

Swallow your pride and give him some credit! geez.

[saint-stu]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 9add0b5f21

St Kilda makes late trade play for young Port Adelaide full back Logan Austin

CONTRACTED Port Adelaide defender Logan Austin is wanted by St Kilda in a late play in the AFL trade period.

Austin, 22, is being promised more game time at St Kilda as the Saints seek to add to their defensive options after trying to sign GWS Giants defender Adam Tomlinson.

Austin, a fourth-round draft pick in 2014, is one of three Power players who could find new home in today’s frantic rush to the 1.30pm deadline to the close of the trade period.

Specialist forward Aaron Young is expected to score his trade to Gold Coast. And ruckman Matthew Lobbe yesterday joined Carlton’s wish list while Brisbane continued to haggle over the contract that he carries from Alberton and does not expire until the end of 2019.

Austin has played 13 AFL games in two seasons with Port Adelaide - and just two this year when his role in defence was taken by Tom Clurey.

Port Adelaide does hold the upper hand in any trade talks with St Kilda by holding Austin to a contract for next season. But the Power has emphasised in a busy trade program its willingness to move on players who are seeking more opportunity elsewhere.

So far, Port Adelaide has traded contracted forward Jarman Impey to Hawthorn, uncontracted midfielder Brendon Ah Chee to West Coast and released restricted free-agent utility Jackson Trengove to the Western Bulldogs.

The Power has drawn in contracted Melbourne key position player Jack Watts and free agents, midfielder Tom Rockliff (Brisbane) and midfielder-forward Steven Motlop (Geelong).

The trade period is facing a dramatic ending with deals still to be secured for Brownlow Medallist Gary Ablett in a go-home move to Geelong from Gold Coast and estranged Western Bulldogs forward Jake Stringer to Essendon.

[Drake Huggins]

I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.

It was a bloody good guess, but it absolutely was not out of left field. Jaxons gave a very good hint which narrowed it down to a small number of defenders at port. CQS guessed it (great guess, much credit), but Jaxons confirmed it immediately.

Swallow your pride and give him some credit! geez.

Good grief, Saint-stu. I don't need to swallow my pride. I value Jaxons, but in this case, another poster beat him to it. Is that so difficult for you to swallow? Credit where it's due. How many times do I have to post that this is not a criticism of Jaxons, but praise of CQS? Fair dinkum, have you drunk the Kool Aid?

[st.byron]

Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!

For others, he's just another opportunity to prove their superior intelligence and worldliness by seeing through his ruse......i.e. polish their own self image.

Here's a guy who comes on here with humility, not big noting and beating his own drum, just sharing info and people can't just accept it for what it is and allow others to enjoy that.
Apart from the pasting Jaxons has copped on here, I and various others are in the past few weeks according to those who aren't blinded by the light - an arse licker, a gullible sheep, projecting my messiah complex and swooning over a false prophet. Thanks guys. Champions each and every one of you.

[MC Gusto]

Drake Huggins are you for real? Have you read the post?

CQ guessed the player based on the clue

Jaxons confirmed right away

What am I missing?

Perhaps we should ask CQ ??

This place is unbelievable

[st.byron]

Drake Huggins are you for real? Have you read the post?

CQ guessed the player based on the clue

Jaxons confirmed right away

What am I missing?

Perhaps we should ask CQ ??

This place is unbelievable

Some will argue black is white just to be right.

[kalsaint]

That’s bulls***
Jaxons called it with a clue, Cq quite rightly guessed it - which was a good get and jaxons responded confirming

Fine if that’s the case but no reason to get your nickers in a knot Gusto.



Thought CQ initially called it, but if Pines called it first, more than glad to be corrected.

It's no biggie.

Craziness creeping in here. Did it really matter where or who initiated the likely trade?

Important thing here is do we need this person? What would we offer? Any expectancy on Ports side?

Is the leg now repaired without any future issue expected? Late trade deal could provided some risk but may also be a great opportunity if his kicking is as good as stated earlier.

[saint-stu]

I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.

It was a bloody good guess, but it absolutely was not out of left field. Jaxons gave a very good hint which narrowed it down to a small number of defenders at port. CQS guessed it (great guess, much credit), but Jaxons confirmed it immediately.

Swallow your pride and give him some credit! geez.

Good grief, Saint-stu. I don't need to swallow my pride. I value Jaxons, but in this case, another poster beat him to it. Is that so difficult for you to swallow? Credit where it's due. How many times do I have to post that this is not a criticism of Jaxons, but praise of CQS? Fair dinkum, have you drunk the Kool Aid?

The Kool Aid tastes good Drake Huggins. You are completely wrong and you know it. You're just trolling now.

[saint-stu]

That’s bulls***
Jaxons called it with a clue, Cq quite rightly guessed it - which was a good get and jaxons responded confirming

Fine if that’s the case but no reason to get your nickers in a knot Gusto.



Thought CQ initially called it, but if Pines called it first, more than glad to be corrected.

It's no biggie.

Craziness creeping in here. Did it really matter where or who initiated the likely trade?

Important thing here is do we need this person? What would we offer? Any expectancy on Ports side?

Is the leg now repaired without any future issue expected? Late trade deal could provided some risk but may also be a great opportunity if his kicking is as good as stated earlier.

It's important that a valuable insider has been scared away by this negative crap don't you think?

[Drake Huggins]

He confirmed AFTER someone nominated. I have a bridge for sale, MCG. Great revenue, connects the northern and southern suburbs of Sydney. Honestly, what is it about Messiahs? Are you so fragile that you can't take a bit of truth about your hero? I value Jaxons, but slavish devotion, beyond any realistic criticism is a cult. It's only an internet forum, and some are carrying on as though it's life and death. If it makes you feel better, I concede. Jaxons is the Messiah, right about everything and I will not stain his immaculate reputation with facts.

[skeptic]

Mods can I make a suggestion for next year...

2 years ago was the first Jaxons come on down thread.

Then last year it made a comeback and it was a fun call back to the year before.

Now it appears that the name in the title is simply drawing too much negative attention towards a poster that ain't asking for this much in the way of fan fare


If someone launches another thread next year, can we just call it a trade rumour thread or something

[Captain Impossible]

Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.

One of our own posters did..

Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.

Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.

Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.

Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........

This!

[Numpty]

Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!

For others, he's just another opportunity to prove their superior intelligence and worldliness by seeing through his ruse......i.e. polish their own self image.

Here's a guy who comes on here with humility, not big noting and beating his own drum, just sharing info and people can't just accept it for what it is and allow others to enjoy that.
Apart from the pasting Jaxons has copped on here, I and various others are in the past few weeks according to those who aren't blinded by the light - an arse licker, a gullible sheep, projecting my messiah complex and swooning over a false prophet. Thanks guys. Champions each and every one of you.

You knew what you signed up for, believe me. #makingsaintsationalreallygrateagain.

[kosifantutti]

Drake Huggins are you for real? Have you read the post?

CQ guessed the player based on the clue

Jaxons confirmed right away

What am I missing?

Perhaps we should ask CQ ??

Let’s ask him.


viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93983&hilit=Logan&s ... 5#p1703007

[SaintPav]

Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.

One of our own posters did..

Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.

Fair enough.

I concede I was wrong.

Jaxons called it correctly.

[SuperDuper]

Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.

One of our own posters did..

Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.

Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.

Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.

Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........

Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!

the only people I see using the word messiah are people like you. Everyone else just thinks that Jaxons is well connected at the St. Kilda football club and gives good inside knowledge before it is in the media. His record over the past 6 years shows he does that.

That certainly does not make him anything worthy of worship. It just makes his posts about trades far more interesting than posts talking about him and posts that invent rubbish about people who would like him to keep posting.

[Drake Huggins]

Wow! A footy forum. Get a life. We're arguing over who got what right or wrong or may have not. I concede. I'm almost as big of a half-wit for arguing as those defending their guru. I'm wrong. I was always wrong. I will not ever challenge anything on here, or those who post. I apologise for the distress I've caused. How could I've been so insensitive?

[Jacks Back]

I don't mind the postings of DH normally but on this one you're being a total tool and f***wit. DH - Drake Huggins more like Dick Head

[Con Gorozidis]

Sounds like a character from a Sci-Fi novel so he is ok by me.
Get him on board!

[Wayne42]

You're right, SP. I believe it was CQS, but I could be wrong. It wasn't Jaxons, but I didn't want to call it for fear of criticising the Messiah and drawing the predictable opprobrium that typically follows such an outrage. No disrespect to Jaxons, either. Valuable poster in the main.

Actually it was Jaxons.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93983&hilit=Logan&s ... 5#p1702860

CQ guessed Logan Austin and Jaxons confirmed.

+ 1.

Jaxons is a genuine itk.

Not sure why people are bagging him. Weird.

Green Eyed ?