Agressive, not reckless.

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Post: # 1703598Post Rosco »

maverick wrote:
SuperDuper wrote:
maverick wrote:There are two exceptions to this.
Watts and stringer.
Both are A grade and could be elite, both are dangerous players with X factor and required development.
We could use either or both and probably get them with pick 8 and a 3rd rounder.
We could get Stringer by trading 8 to Tigers for 15 and 17 and using 15 for Stringer. Dogs would do it. Tigers would do it (they will get Naish at around 17 anyway without needng the pick so they are getting a 15 to 8 upgrade for free)

It is incredible to think that our club does not want Stringer for effectively an 8 to 17 downgrade.

I am not even saying we should do it... just that if you said that was possible 8 months ago, and that we would not do it, you would say ya must be dreamin!
We could then swap pick 17 for watts and pick 35
Meaning we get stronger and watts plus pick 35 for pick 8
But why do we need two medium sized forwards? Issues aside.


stkfc1
Club Player
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Post: # 1703605Post stkfc1 »

Rosco wrote:
maverick wrote:
SuperDuper wrote:
maverick wrote:There are two exceptions to this.
Watts and stringer.
Both are A grade and could be elite, both are dangerous players with X factor and required development.
We could use either or both and probably get them with pick 8 and a 3rd rounder.
We could get Stringer by trading 8 to Tigers for 15 and 17 and using 15 for Stringer. Dogs would do it. Tigers would do it (they will get Naish at around 17 anyway without needng the pick so they are getting a 15 to 8 upgrade for free)

It is incredible to think that our club does not want Stringer for effectively an 8 to 17 downgrade.

I am not even saying we should do it... just that if you said that was possible 8 months ago, and that we would not do it, you would say ya must be dreamin!
We could then swap pick 17 for watts and pick 35
Meaning we get stronger and watts plus pick 35 for pick 8
But why do we need two medium sized forwards? Issues aside.
Yeah dont see the need. We have Membrey who's better than both of them. Also Acres can go forward.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Post: # 1703606Post CQ SAINT »

Im going to be aggressive tonight with a bag of limes and a bottle of Gilbeys. We've gone from Kelly and Martin to Strangler and Watts. OMG.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Post: # 1703607Post degruch »

CQ SAINT wrote:Im going to be aggressive tonight with a bag of limes and a bottle of Gilbeys. We've gone from Kelly and Martin to Strangler and Watts. OMG.
Yes, the general direction of discussion seems to have flipped 180 degrees since the OP...let's get reckless!


Post Reply