It means a lot to me. Lockett wore it. Baldock wore it. Gresham shows every sign of being a worthy custodian.dragit wrote:They would have to consider it, if it meant we land the premier young midfielder in the comp in Kelly.bigcarl wrote:No. There's a reason they gave Gresham No.4.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Gresham is an untouchable, AFAIC. Then again, GWS is openly pursuing a small forward, midfielder, such as Puopolo. If push came to shove and they wanted the Gresh for Kelly or as part of a package deal, would you do it? Things that make you go hmmmmm......l.l.
Kelly is a gun midfielder, Gresham will be a gun midfielder.
Gresham is an exciting young player with some mad tricks, but I have my doubts he can become a genuine midfielder. The club obviously love him though, so it would be a very tough decision.g
The number 4 jumper doesn't mean a lot… Eli Templeton & Clint Jones being the previous two custodians.
That aside, how many games has Gresham played? Forty-odd. For all you and I know he could become a better midfielder than Kelly. Put Kelly in a couple of losing midfields and he won't look so flash. He's surrounded by class where he is.
I'll be disappointed if the club starts jettisoning future stars to get in some "messiah" who totally screws the pay scale and leaves us a knee reconstruction from disaster. If we can secure a gun on a reasonable deal without offloading one of our own, then all's well.
We need to stay the course in building an even list. It will show big dividends imo as soon as next season.