degruch wrote:Just to clarify, is "no he's not unhappy at the Saints" the same as "he IS unhappy at the Saints"? There's so much negativity in that statement I've become confused!
Loves the saints
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
degruch wrote:Just to clarify, is "no he's not unhappy at the Saints" the same as "he IS unhappy at the Saints"? There's so much negativity in that statement I've become confused!
Just eliminate the double negatives and punctuatedegruch wrote:Just to clarify, is "no he's not unhappy at the Saints" the same as "he IS unhappy at the Saints"? There's so much negativity in that statement I've become confused!
DWOODROW wrote:degruch wrote:Just to clarify, is "no he's not unhappy at the Saints" the same as "he IS unhappy at the Saints"? There's so much negativity in that statement I've become confused!
Loves the saints
This season, I think you could ask that question in regard to every team in the competition, including GWS, Adelaide and Geelong. A team only needs to be 1% or 2% off and they'll be smashed. It is an extraordinarily even season, a point many here miss.st.byron wrote:tony74 wrote:Even though the win/loss ratio is not entirely surprising the method we have played in the last month had been putrid. OK we've played some top teams but it's very disappointing the way we've capitulated. Few different things done today and on Wednesday coming so hopefully their heads will be switched on Friday. It really is so much between the ears.
Seems to me that all is not well with the playing group. How can a team that performs so well against the ladder leaders follow it up with consecutive weeks of garbage? The players haven't totally lost their skills, fitness and ability in the past weeks, so it must be a mental thing. Lack of clarity about the game plan???? Lack of sense of being in it together with a focused goal????
Whatever it is let's pray it turns around this week.
Riewoldt to CHB? I think GT's suggestion has merit.tony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
We will need some height in the backline as North have Waite and Brown -both very tall and good marks.Linton Lodger wrote:Riewoldt to CHB? I think GT's suggestion has merit.tony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
dont forgot Mason Wood as a tall forward for them, hard to forgot after the debacle last yearlongtimesaint wrote:We will need some height in the backline as North have Waite and Brown -both very tall and good marks.Linton Lodger wrote:Riewoldt to CHB? I think GT's suggestion has merit.tony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
Not a good week to be down a backman.
Effectively 2 backmen down, because the absence of one, means Robbo has to be accountable,tony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
You've got some issues manWellardSaint wrote:Effectively 2 backmen down, because the absence of one, means Robbo has to be accountable,tony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
and can't play that loose man down back, therefore becomes a huge liability.
For someone of his height and experience, he is useless in the contest.
I don't care that he was awarded "Sainter of the Day" 6 times this year,
we play one extra down back to free him up, so he gets cheap easy kicks.
The second quarter of one game, the oppo changed their forward line
and his "talent" was exposed as fake. All-Australian my southern blowhole.
The quicker Goddard comes on, the better.
Sick of seeing Robbo get lauded as a divine hybrid of Alex Rance and Josh Gibson, when
he is just a downhill skier.
AFL website saystony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
I don't think Browny's 'secretly injured', he was very obviously injured on Friday and the press pretty much consigned him to a couple weeks off straight away.WellardSaint wrote:AFL website saystony74 wrote:Progressing well too. Working with Sean. We will be one backman down though.
"Carlisle copped a heavy corkie against Adelaide but is expected to face North Melbourne"
as reported by Dinny Navaratnam (Dinny actually doesn't drive a Navara, he owns a Toyota HiLux )
so either Jake is out, or NJB is secretly injured (he did come off late and spoke to one trainer, looked in a bit of pain)
Not going anywhere:dragit wrote:This is what I heard we will be doing:
trade out:
hickey 350
savage 300
lonie 200
weller 350
delist/retire
Riewoldt 500 (250 cap)
Montagna 500 (250 cap)
Gilbert 400
Dempster 400
wright 150
holmes 150
making roughly 2.8 million cap space
free agents
Martin 1.2
Pittard 500
trade in
Kelly 800 (our 2017 & 2018 1st)
Lever 800 (hawthorns 2017 1st)
costing roughly 3.3 million PA
Correct...those guys have been in the system for ages, nobody will be looking at them.Con Gorozidis wrote:Trade value for Savage, Weller, HIckey or Lonie = 0. Nil. Nada. Nothing. Zilch. Unless you mean to the VFL?
If we got one of either Martin, Lever or Kelly it would be a massive coup and a massive surprise.
Claiming all three is truly laughable.
I would pass on Pittard as he's not really an upgrade on Webster.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:I like your plan, dragit, but alas I fear it is a beautiful dream, appropriately framed by the rainbow vomitting unicorn. The only players of any trade value we have and would be willing to trade are Dunstan, Longer, Webster and shock horror, Newnes!