Johnny Member wrote:meher baba wrote:
But I realise it's no good trying to change someone's mind when they are in the meltdown phase.
Meltdown phase?
Would you care to point how my attitude and/opinion has differed from the pre-season?
Accusing someone of a 'meltdown' is a pretty soft throwaway line to hide behind when you don't like what they're saying.
My comment wasn't meant to be specifically directed at you, but at a sentiment expressed on this forum since Saturday by a number of posters (and by more on Big Footy, if anyone is interested in looking over there).
If you want specific feedback about your own posts: well, yes, I can agree with you that you've been pretty negative about the team all season. It must be extremely gratifying for you that we haven't made the 8 this year and that you can therefore feel that you were right.
I neither like nor dislike what you have been saying. On the whole, I have found it irrelevant, as I don't understand the benchmark against which you are assessing the club. As I have already pointed out, we were in a bad way at the end of 2013. We had been wasteful and ineffective in our recruitment for about 5 years, our list didn't look like capable of going anywhere, the team's morale was shot, and we were looking set to become a long-term basket case.
I'm saying that, given that we were in that situation only four years ago, I reckon Summers, Finnis, Richo et al have done a pretty good job in turning things around. Our playing list, while not good enough to win a flag, has improved significantly over what it was at the end of 2013. Our team morale appears to be pretty good, and the players seem settled. It's far from a perfect situation, but look where we started.
So, in short, I'm assessing the club against the benchmark of how we were four years ago. What's your benchmark: how the Giants or Swans are going? Or, to make perhaps a fairer comparison, how Hawthorn and Geelong have been over the last decade?
If the latter, I will return to my point that, if we had wanted to be like Hawthorn and Geelong over the past decade, we wouldn't have started from where we started: that is, after three years of being one of the top teams in the comp, we wouldn't have sacked our coach, then our chairman and then our CEO (after he had effectively engineered the sacking of the coach and chairman). We would have stuck to the strategy that had brought us the success we had enjoyed. Instead, we rolled the dice and brought in a super coach who, thank goodness, turned out to be one (given that his main recommendation seems to have been that Robert Walls liked him, he might well have not turned out to be any good). But the super coach was more inclined to use up resources rather than build them up, so he left us in 2011 in a terrible mess which was then made worse by Nettlefold, Watters, Pelchen, etc.
So, between 2006 and 2013, we weren't following the path of the consistently successful clubs. So the current regime has been starting from a long way back. It's therefore completely unfair not to cut them a fair bit of slack. Come back in 2019 and, if we are still languishing in the middle of the table, I'll agree with you that they have failed. But, until then, I don't see your analysis as being relevant to anything much, other than to tell us what we already know: ie, that quite a few other clubs (some with a fair bit of help from the AFL) have managed themselves into a better current position than us.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift