If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Long time reader, first time poster. I was looking at Richmond's season this year. Last year, they were written off, doomed to yet another rebuild. The coach hadn't won a final in seven years and the list was stuffed. Most, including me, had them in the bottom five. They brought in three recruits, Prestia (very average), Caddy (not much chop) and Nankervis, who made a good start but has hit a major flat spot.
Most of the improvement has come from within. The material that was already there. The coach brought in a couple of new assistants, changed the game plan and, viola! They are heading towards the top four! Yes, Shitmond!
They have two out and out champions in Dusty and Rance. Cotchin and Riewoldt are very good. Apart from those four, they don't have a lot more than we do. We have our own Riewoldt (for four more games at least), Jack Steven, Seb Ross and Jake Carlisle. We have many more potential improvers. Billings, Membrey, Bruce, White, Marshall, Gresham, Newnes, Roberton, Steele, McCartin and Freeman. All potential guns. Stevens, Geary, Webster, DMack and Hickey. Lots to work with. Add any two or three of Kelly, Hopper, Smith, Pittard and Rockliff and we are top four. You know it makes sense. Go saints!
Most of the improvement has come from within. The material that was already there. The coach brought in a couple of new assistants, changed the game plan and, viola! They are heading towards the top four! Yes, Shitmond!
They have two out and out champions in Dusty and Rance. Cotchin and Riewoldt are very good. Apart from those four, they don't have a lot more than we do. We have our own Riewoldt (for four more games at least), Jack Steven, Seb Ross and Jake Carlisle. We have many more potential improvers. Billings, Membrey, Bruce, White, Marshall, Gresham, Newnes, Roberton, Steele, McCartin and Freeman. All potential guns. Stevens, Geary, Webster, DMack and Hickey. Lots to work with. Add any two or three of Kelly, Hopper, Smith, Pittard and Rockliff and we are top four. You know it makes sense. Go saints!
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri 08 May 2009 12:59pm
- Location: Mill Park
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
We are on right track, had we won the games against Eagles (round 2) and aginst Port (last week) we would be close to Top 4.
Couple of good players next year should have as in good state.
Couple of good players next year should have as in good state.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Welcome. Are you WW?
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
No. Interesting poster, but tended to lecture a bit.Jacks Back wrote:Welcome. Are you WW?
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
It seems the Packster never wore a headband - disappointing!!
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
He did get his haircut at the behest of a Tony Jewell, but under Jezza the headband was definitely there.Devilhead wrote:
It seems the Packster never wore a headband - disappointing!!
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8390
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
I sense a red herring here...plausible deniability, a phrase used in the military for decades (US especially)GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:No. Interesting poster, but tended to lecture a bit.Jacks Back wrote:Welcome. Are you WW?
I think you are WW in disguise
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
There was an interesting analysis of Richmond's gameplan in the Age recently.
In 2016 they ranked one of the highest in uncontested possessions.
This year they are one of the lowest.
Basically they changed from a side that chipped the ball around sideways/backwards to unmarked teammates playing keepings off "round and back again football" until they were forced to kick long to a flooded forward line where the ball was easily defended ...
... to a side that moves the ball quickly with long direct kicking - often to a contest but at least just a 1:1 marking contest with open space for crummers.
It has worked for them.
We in 2017 are playing the same keepings off rubbish that Richmond did last year.
We have two or three forward marking options in Bruce/Membrey/Paddy-Nick plus some crummers in Gresham/Lonie etc..
Perhaps Richo should take note and go with a more attacking "move the ball quickly to an open forward line" approach to give our marking forwards and crummers a chance to shine before the cavalry arrive?
In 2016 they ranked one of the highest in uncontested possessions.
This year they are one of the lowest.
Basically they changed from a side that chipped the ball around sideways/backwards to unmarked teammates playing keepings off "round and back again football" until they were forced to kick long to a flooded forward line where the ball was easily defended ...
... to a side that moves the ball quickly with long direct kicking - often to a contest but at least just a 1:1 marking contest with open space for crummers.
It has worked for them.
We in 2017 are playing the same keepings off rubbish that Richmond did last year.
We have two or three forward marking options in Bruce/Membrey/Paddy-Nick plus some crummers in Gresham/Lonie etc..
Perhaps Richo should take note and go with a more attacking "move the ball quickly to an open forward line" approach to give our marking forwards and crummers a chance to shine before the cavalry arrive?
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Gregpackhamsheadband
Is that like sandy Duncan's glass eye ?
Is that like sandy Duncan's glass eye ?
In red white and black from 73
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Pretty sure in the famous GWS win we played run and gun footy. Problem with run and gun is you need a few gun players like the Tigers have to pull it off successfullyEnrico_Misso wrote:There was an interesting analysis of Richmond's gameplan in the Age recently.
In 2016 they ranked one of the highest in uncontested possessions.
This year they are one of the lowest.
Basically they changed from a side that chipped the ball around sideways/backwards to unmarked teammates playing keepings off "round and back again football" until they were forced to kick long to a flooded forward line where the ball was easily defended ...
... to a side that moves the ball quickly with long direct kicking - often to a contest but at least just a 1:1 marking contest with open space for crummers.
It has worked for them.
We in 2017 are playing the same keepings off rubbish that Richmond did last year.
We have two or three forward marking options in Bruce/Membrey/Paddy-Nick plus some crummers in Gresham/Lonie etc..
Perhaps Richo should take note and go with a more attacking "move the ball quickly to an open forward line" approach to give our marking forwards and crummers a chance to shine before the cavalry arrive?
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
ha ha ha ha! GOLD!mr six o'clock wrote:Gregpackhamsheadband
Is that like sandy Duncan's glass eye ?
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Yes, like the Tigers did in round 16 ha ha ha ha!saintspremiers wrote:Pretty sure in the famous GWS win we played run and gun footy. Problem with run and gun is you need a few gun players like the Tigers have to pull it off successfullyEnrico_Misso wrote:There was an interesting analysis of Richmond's gameplan in the Age recently.
In 2016 they ranked one of the highest in uncontested possessions.
This year they are one of the lowest.
Basically they changed from a side that chipped the ball around sideways/backwards to unmarked teammates playing keepings off "round and back again football" until they were forced to kick long to a flooded forward line where the ball was easily defended ...
... to a side that moves the ball quickly with long direct kicking - often to a contest but at least just a 1:1 marking contest with open space for crummers.
It has worked for them.
We in 2017 are playing the same keepings off rubbish that Richmond did last year.
We have two or three forward marking options in Bruce/Membrey/Paddy-Nick plus some crummers in Gresham/Lonie etc..
Perhaps Richo should take note and go with a more attacking "move the ball quickly to an open forward line" approach to give our marking forwards and crummers a chance to shine before the cavalry arrive?
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Gold!mr six o'clock wrote:Gregpackhamsheadband
Is that like sandy Duncan's glass eye ?
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11354
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1349 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Welcome, GregPackhamsHeadband! (love the nickname, BTW)
Credit Hardwick for significantly tweaking their game plan after a disastrous 2016 campaign. They indeed recruited very well at the end of the season. It's incredible how Hardwick has managed keep his position at Punt Road, despite the history of impulsively wielding the axe at previous coaches. I hope they have a good finals campaign, but am skeptical given their recent history of choking in the first week of September. I hope we crush them again for Rooey's (supposed) swan-song
Credit Hardwick for significantly tweaking their game plan after a disastrous 2016 campaign. They indeed recruited very well at the end of the season. It's incredible how Hardwick has managed keep his position at Punt Road, despite the history of impulsively wielding the axe at previous coaches. I hope they have a good finals campaign, but am skeptical given their recent history of choking in the first week of September. I hope we crush them again for Rooey's (supposed) swan-song
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
If I can find the YouTube footage of him on The Winners, I'll post it here, Devilhead. My sister had a massive crush on him and loved the red head with headband look. Each to their own, I guess. A very smart footballer, who probably would've played a lot more but for being at the saints at our lowest. He liked Jezza, but is less complimentary about Tony Jewell. He was a very fine player for Redan in the BFL, at a time the standard was very high.Devilhead wrote:
It seems the Packster never wore a headband - disappointing!!
We got so many players from there, just couldn't develop and keep them. Maurice O'Keefe was one of the best I ever saw up there. Only three years with the saints. Another victim of the move to the city or leave ultimatum. Tweeddale was another wasted talent. Muir, Baker, Perovic. The list goes on. Lost them or couldn't get the best from them. Peter Keil was good enough to win the B & F in his first year at the club, straight from country footy. We never did exploit that region well enough.
Carlton had Bendigo and mined it (pun intended) for all it was worth. Helped the bastards win seven flags in 20 years. Don't get me started on Hawthorn getting the Peninsula instead of us. Imagine Brereton, Matthews, Moore, Mew etc. in our teams of the 80's. Would've done a bit better than we did.
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
- Selhurst Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004 9:09am
- Location: I do like to be beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:If I can find the YouTube footage of him on The Winners, I'll post it here, Devilhead. My sister had a massive crush on him and loved the red head with headband look. Each to their own, I guess. A very smart footballer, who probably would've played a lot more but for being at the saints at our lowest. He liked Jezza, but is less complimentary about Tony Jewell. He was a very fine player for Redan in the BFL, at a time the standard was very high.Devilhead wrote:
It seems the Packster never wore a headband - disappointing!!
We got so many players from there, just couldn't develop and keep them. Maurice O'Keefe was one of the best I ever saw up there. Only three years with the saints. Another victim of the move to the city or leave ultimatum. Tweeddale was another wasted talent. Muir, Baker, Perovic. The list goes on. Lost them or couldn't get the best from them. Peter Keil was good enough to win the B & F in his first year at the club, straight from country footy. We never did exploit that region well enough.
Carlton had Bendigo and mined it (pun intended) for all it was worth. Helped the bastards win seven flags in 20 years. Don't get me started on Hawthorn getting the Peninsula instead of us. Imagine Brereton, Matthews, Moore, Mew etc. in our teams of the 80's. Would've done a bit better than we did.
In the pre season practice matches he had extremely long hair kept off his face with a hippy like headband. He was ordered to cut it all off before the season started. I think he was a student teacher from memory.
"...If there has been one recurring theme through this whole shocking mess, it has been the misguided, inflated egos and their ill-judged determination to cling to long-standing old boy friendships. The bad advice that has guided the selfish and culpable James Hird has not only punctuated this saga but symbolised it..."
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Spot on Selhurst Saint. He's still a performing arts teacher working in Weribbee. My sister thought he was so cute, he took Trev's spot in her heart! The headband made a reappearance at the Junction Oval when he booted a couple against the Roys. Good bloke, and very funny. No wonder Tony Jewell didn't like him!
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
Is this him?GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Spot on Selhurst Saint. He's still a performing arts teacher working in Weribbee. My sister thought he was so cute, he took Trev's spot in her heart! The headband made a reappearance at the Junction Oval when he booted a couple against the Roys. Good bloke, and very funny. No wonder Tony Jewell didn't like him!
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: If Richmond can, Why Can't We?
I was just thinking the same thing, Jack's back! Gold!Jacks Back wrote:Is this him?GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Spot on Selhurst Saint. He's still a performing arts teacher working in Weribbee. My sister thought he was so cute, he took Trev's spot in her heart! The headband made a reappearance at the Junction Oval when he booted a couple against the Roys. Good bloke, and very funny. No wonder Tony Jewell didn't like him!
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?