Analysing "that" final goal
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Analysing "that" final goal
What our players should learn:
1) Billy had to either get the ball forward or stop the classic flip over the back for the run around - this is a standard ZONE play in forward moves - as an ex ruckman it kills me to see our young rucks make this mistake. Billy had his positioning all wrong at this boundary throw in and his one job was to ensure the ball didn't go to the classic attacking zone. He could have given away a free kick and we would have been better off!
2) Seb had to ensure he was protecting the space that Gray wanted to run into at the back of the hit out - he should have been hassling him with a hard tag and restricting his run rather than trying to win the ball and clearing it
3) Luke had to be ready to be ready to step into (block) the run of Gray if he released (which he did) but Luke was flat footed
4) Billings tried to tackle but was too late (but he was third in line for Gray responsibility at that contest)
5) Worst of all was Blake - he was unmanned in the space where Gray would run into at the 50m arc and instead of remaining and protecting the dangerous space 50m from goal ... he ran to the contest on the ATTACKING side looking for the forward tap! Even if he leaves the dangerous space, if he had run to the defensive side of the ruck contest (behind) then he could have put pressure on Gray.
Bottom line is that none of these guys have played 100 games of footy - not even close. All in the 30-60 game zone.
They will all learn from it.
This season is exactly as i thought it would be.
I maintain that our real premiership window is 2020-22.
We can make finals next year 2018.
We can be top 4 in 2019.
IF we keep this list together and recruit well.
1) Billy had to either get the ball forward or stop the classic flip over the back for the run around - this is a standard ZONE play in forward moves - as an ex ruckman it kills me to see our young rucks make this mistake. Billy had his positioning all wrong at this boundary throw in and his one job was to ensure the ball didn't go to the classic attacking zone. He could have given away a free kick and we would have been better off!
2) Seb had to ensure he was protecting the space that Gray wanted to run into at the back of the hit out - he should have been hassling him with a hard tag and restricting his run rather than trying to win the ball and clearing it
3) Luke had to be ready to be ready to step into (block) the run of Gray if he released (which he did) but Luke was flat footed
4) Billings tried to tackle but was too late (but he was third in line for Gray responsibility at that contest)
5) Worst of all was Blake - he was unmanned in the space where Gray would run into at the 50m arc and instead of remaining and protecting the dangerous space 50m from goal ... he ran to the contest on the ATTACKING side looking for the forward tap! Even if he leaves the dangerous space, if he had run to the defensive side of the ruck contest (behind) then he could have put pressure on Gray.
Bottom line is that none of these guys have played 100 games of footy - not even close. All in the 30-60 game zone.
They will all learn from it.
This season is exactly as i thought it would be.
I maintain that our real premiership window is 2020-22.
We can make finals next year 2018.
We can be top 4 in 2019.
IF we keep this list together and recruit well.
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
You'd think, since our captain is a 150+ game defender, there'd be some awareness on ground as the throw in was being set up. Frustrating brain fart.
- The Recruit
- Club Player
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 118 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
2.12 was also a big issue. After two weeks of insipid footy would have been nice to win yesterday.
- The Recruit
- Club Player
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 118 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Geary works hard but can't do it himself...you need at least 4-8 onfield leaders/coaches to be a great team.degruch wrote:You'd think, since our captain is a 150+ game defender, there'd be some awareness on ground as the throw in was being set up. Frustrating brain fart.
We had 1-2 at most yesterday
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
spot on.....................your statement is 100% correct
Gear is an honest toiler at best.........................lacks true skils and nous............am dumb founded how he is captain or maybe I am unfair because I am not there
on the field of play!!!!
Gear is an honest toiler at best.........................lacks true skils and nous............am dumb founded how he is captain or maybe I am unfair because I am not there
on the field of play!!!!
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8389
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1910 times
- Been thanked: 887 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Ruckmen (or so I thought) who are trying to defend, not attack,
seem to hit the ball towards the boundary.
Especially in a tight game in the oppo's fwd line.
Didn't happen. Maybe our guys were expecting Billy to go the boundary.
Regardless, they should have been ready to defend if Billy lost the tap.
seem to hit the ball towards the boundary.
Especially in a tight game in the oppo's fwd line.
Didn't happen. Maybe our guys were expecting Billy to go the boundary.
Regardless, they should have been ready to defend if Billy lost the tap.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
I haven't seen anyone show a close up, slow-mo or even still shots of the goal yet. Skunk must've been only just over the line. Foxtel didn't even show a replay of it.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Great analysis. We would have been better if Carslile had have been pinged for deliberate.BackFromUSA wrote:What our players should learn:
1) Billy had to either get the ball forward or stop the classic flip over the back for the run around - this is a standard ZONE play in forward moves - as an ex ruckman it kills me to see our young rucks make this mistake. Billy had his positioning all wrong at this boundary throw in and his one job was to ensure the ball didn't go to the classic attacking zone. He could have given away a free kick and we would have been better off!
2) Seb had to ensure he was protecting the space that Gray wanted to run into at the back of the hit out - he should have been hassling him with a hard tag and restricting his run rather than trying to win the ball and clearing it
3) Luke had to be ready to be ready to step into (block) the run of Gray if he released (which he did) but Luke was flat footed
4) Billings tried to tackle but was too late (but he was third in line for Gray responsibility at that contest)
5) Worst of all was Blake - he was unmanned in the space where Gray would run into at the 50m arc and instead of remaining and protecting the dangerous space 50m from goal ... he ran to the contest on the ATTACKING side looking for the forward tap! Even if he leaves the dangerous space, if he had run to the defensive side of the ruck contest (behind) then he could have put pressure on Gray.
Bottom line is that none of these guys have played 100 games of footy - not even close. All in the 30-60 game zone.
They will all learn from it.
This season is exactly as i thought it would be.
I maintain that our real premiership window is 2020-22.
We can make finals next year 2018.
We can be top 4 in 2019.
IF we keep this list together and recruit well.
Still, it was the mids fault; we lost the last 3 clearances of the game. We win just one of those and we win the game.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
The overall sentiment I agree with
We are missing the impact of the likes of McCartin and Freeman, both top 10 Draft picks plus the development of Goddard
Then there is the experience of Armitage and Gilbert missing
So, if we recruit well we improve our bottom 6 at least and that is the requirement
With the analysis of that one event in a game of 120 minutes, the real problem to me is that, yet again, the opposition ruckman opposed to Longer has been BOG
How many times in Longer's 50 plus games has this. Even the case?
And yesterday it cost us any chance of playing in September this year
The positive was White (as expected off his debut game) so we can now move Geary on
The comment on Geary and leadership is noted in the OP and is correct
It was absent
The captaincy has to be assumed by a player who can impact on result, who can lead from the front and drag his team with him
I would be seriously looking at Carlisle in 2018
The other good news is that Dunstan is confirming what he showed us on his debut
The presence of Steele and Stevens has held him back, as has the emergence of Ross
He is now back assuming his correct responsibilities
And Acres will be a star
Now to get Hickey back to his 2016 form
Again this may come down to responsibility
Then there is the abject nonsense of rucking Bruce and leaving only Membrey as a forward marking option
So hop into that, fellow believers
We are missing the impact of the likes of McCartin and Freeman, both top 10 Draft picks plus the development of Goddard
Then there is the experience of Armitage and Gilbert missing
So, if we recruit well we improve our bottom 6 at least and that is the requirement
With the analysis of that one event in a game of 120 minutes, the real problem to me is that, yet again, the opposition ruckman opposed to Longer has been BOG
How many times in Longer's 50 plus games has this. Even the case?
And yesterday it cost us any chance of playing in September this year
The positive was White (as expected off his debut game) so we can now move Geary on
The comment on Geary and leadership is noted in the OP and is correct
It was absent
The captaincy has to be assumed by a player who can impact on result, who can lead from the front and drag his team with him
I would be seriously looking at Carlisle in 2018
The other good news is that Dunstan is confirming what he showed us on his debut
The presence of Steele and Stevens has held him back, as has the emergence of Ross
He is now back assuming his correct responsibilities
And Acres will be a star
Now to get Hickey back to his 2016 form
Again this may come down to responsibility
Then there is the abject nonsense of rucking Bruce and leaving only Membrey as a forward marking option
So hop into that, fellow believers
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Had they known there was only 19 seconds left at the throw Billy couldve either chosen or been instructed to give away a free after the throw in.
By the time the ump blew his whistle and the clock stopped it would've been down to about 12 seconds.
But did they know how short of time it was??
By the time the ump blew his whistle and the clock stopped it would've been down to about 12 seconds.
But did they know how short of time it was??
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
A free kick would have been better but only after the fact. It would not be a viable or sensible tactic.saintspremiers wrote:Had they known there was only 19 seconds left at the throw Billy couldve either chosen or been instructed to give away a free after the throw in.
By the time the ump blew his whistle and the clock stopped it would've been down to about 12 seconds.
But did they know how short of time it was??
Mids went missing when it counted.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Fair enough...but in respect to the OP, we weren't as haplessly devoid of experience and leadership out there as it may seem...a bit short on smarts, maybe.The Recruit wrote:Geary works hard but can't do it himself...you need at least 4-8 onfield leaders/coaches to be a great team.degruch wrote:You'd think, since our captain is a 150+ game defender, there'd be some awareness on ground as the throw in was being set up. Frustrating brain fart.
We had 1-2 at most yesterday
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23157
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9106 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
To the top wrote:The overall sentiment I agree with
We are missing the impact of the likes of McCartin and Freeman, both top 10 Draft picks plus the development of Goddard
Then there is the experience of Armitage and Gilbert missing
So, if we recruit well we improve our bottom 6 at least and that is the requirement
With the analysis of that one event in a game of 120 minutes, the real problem to me is that, yet again, the opposition ruckman opposed to Longer has been BOG
How many times in Longer's 50 plus games has this. Even the case?
And yesterday it cost us any chance of playing in September this year
The positive was White (as expected off his debut game) so we can now move Geary on
The comment on Geary and leadership is noted in the OP and is correct
It was absent
The captaincy has to be assumed by a player who can impact on result, who can lead from the front and drag his team with him
I would be seriously looking at Carlisle in 2018
The other good news is that Dunstan is confirming what he showed us on his debut
The presence of Steele and Stevens has held him back, as has the emergence of Ross
He is now back assuming his correct responsibilities
And Acres will be a star
Now to get Hickey back to his 2016 form
Again this may come down to responsibility
Then there is the abject nonsense of rucking Bruce and leaving only Membrey as a forward marking option
So hop into that, fellow believers
Good post.
Next year, I would go with Armo as captain. gears aint up to it and it shows unfortunately.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 7:43pm
- Location: Gippsland
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
I've heard this from many Saints folk, and I just don't see it. Acres without doubt has talent (not the least is he's a decent set shot) but just does too many dumb things to merit potential star annointment. That handball at CHF to a guy next to a PA player when running through the corridor was horrendous. And to me he always looks like he's coasting rather than going flat out.To the top wrote:And Acres will be a star.
Now perhaps that's just his look ... laconic ... but I'd like him to reduce the dumb stuff and engage high gear a bit more often.
Having said all that he's certainly worth persevering with over some others (Wright, Leonie, Meatball et al).
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 201 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Unless of course it ended up to Port's advantage and they took the advantage. Knowing our luck, that is exactly what would have happened.saintspremiers wrote:Had they known there was only 19 seconds left at the throw Billy couldve either chosen or been instructed to give away a free after the throw in.
By the time the ump blew his whistle and the clock stopped it would've been down to about 12 seconds.
But did they know how short of time it was??
Think of me long enough to make a memory.
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Can't help but think if Gilbert and Montagna are out there, the Gray clearance doesn't happen. Their experience would have led to a better setup at the throw in.
It's a tough way to learn a lesson, but you can bet the next time the situation comes up, Seb and Dunstan will be better prepared.
It's a tough way to learn a lesson, but you can bet the next time the situation comes up, Seb and Dunstan will be better prepared.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
+1St Chris wrote:Can't help but think if Gilbert and Montagna are out there, the Gray clearance doesn't happen. Their experience would have led to a better setup at the throw in.
It's a tough way to learn a lesson, but you can bet the next time the situation comes up, Seb and Dunstan will be better prepared.
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Good summation, although I disagree with your window. I know its dependent on who comes onto our List, but I think anything could happen from next year. Next year will see about 10 players on our list hit the 50-70 game mark and about another 4 hit the 30-50 game mark after another pre season.BackFromUSA wrote:What our players should learn:
1) Billy had to either get the ball forward or stop the classic flip over the back for the run around - this is a standard ZONE play in forward moves - as an ex ruckman it kills me to see our young rucks make this mistake. Billy had his positioning all wrong at this boundary throw in and his one job was to ensure the ball didn't go to the classic attacking zone. He could have given away a free kick and we would have been better off!
2) Seb had to ensure he was protecting the space that Gray wanted to run into at the back of the hit out - he should have been hassling him with a hard tag and restricting his run rather than trying to win the ball and clearing it
3) Luke had to be ready to be ready to step into (block) the run of Gray if he released (which he did) but Luke was flat footed
4) Billings tried to tackle but was too late (but he was third in line for Gray responsibility at that contest)
5) Worst of all was Blake - he was unmanned in the space where Gray would run into at the 50m arc and instead of remaining and protecting the dangerous space 50m from goal ... he ran to the contest on the ATTACKING side looking for the forward tap! Even if he leaves the dangerous space, if he had run to the defensive side of the ruck contest (behind) then he could have put pressure on Gray.
Bottom line is that none of these guys have played 100 games of footy - not even close. All in the 30-60 game zone.
They will all learn from it.
This season is exactly as i thought it would be.
I maintain that our real premiership window is 2020-22.
We can make finals next year 2018.
We can be top 4 in 2019.
IF we keep this list together and recruit well.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
The problem was a total absence of a ruck presence from a boundary throw in
Everything else flowed from that abject failure to at least compete
That said, Round 1 in 2018 and we are able to select McCartin, Freeman, Armitage and Gilbert plus 2 others Drafted or recruited in
Plus Goddard is available
And Hickey for Longer
Then drill down further and name Gilbert, Roberton, Webster and White as the support for Carlisle and Goddard (or Brown)
So, using yesterday's side, who are the bottom 6 or 7 to be moved on?
Everything else flowed from that abject failure to at least compete
That said, Round 1 in 2018 and we are able to select McCartin, Freeman, Armitage and Gilbert plus 2 others Drafted or recruited in
Plus Goddard is available
And Hickey for Longer
Then drill down further and name Gilbert, Roberton, Webster and White as the support for Carlisle and Goddard (or Brown)
So, using yesterday's side, who are the bottom 6 or 7 to be moved on?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
2020-2022? God almighty! I'm 72 NOW! Can I last to 75-77? ( particularly in hostile environments like yesterday's?!) oh well, will just have to try my best!Linton Lodger wrote:Good summation, although I disagree with your window. I know its dependent on who comes onto our List, but I think anything could happen from next year. Next year will see about 10 players on our list hit the 50-70 game mark and about another 4 hit the 30-50 game mark after another pre season.BackFromUSA wrote:What our players should learn:
1) Billy had to either get the ball forward or stop the classic flip over the back for the run around - this is a standard ZONE play in forward moves - as an ex ruckman it kills me to see our young rucks make this mistake. Billy had his positioning all wrong at this boundary throw in and his one job was to ensure the ball didn't go to the classic attacking zone. He could have given away a free kick and we would have been better off!
2) Seb had to ensure he was protecting the space that Gray wanted to run into at the back of the hit out - he should have been hassling him with a hard tag and restricting his run rather than trying to win the ball and clearing it
3) Luke had to be ready to be ready to step into (block) the run of Gray if he released (which he did) but Luke was flat footed
4) Billings tried to tackle but was too late (but he was third in line for Gray responsibility at that contest)
5) Worst of all was Blake - he was unmanned in the space where Gray would run into at the 50m arc and instead of remaining and protecting the dangerous space 50m from goal ... he ran to the contest on the ATTACKING side looking for the forward tap! Even if he leaves the dangerous space, if he had run to the defensive side of the ruck contest (behind) then he could have put pressure on Gray.
Bottom line is that none of these guys have played 100 games of footy - not even close. All in the 30-60 game zone.
They will all learn from it.
This season is exactly as i thought it would be.
I maintain that our real premiership window is 2020-22.
We can make finals next year 2018.
We can be top 4 in 2019.
IF we keep this list together and recruit well.
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Looking at the Amon goal again - that was an assy bounce. Could have easily broken right.
But we just had to kill that final throw in and neutralise it.
But we just had to kill that final throw in and neutralise it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Personal security will be organised for you for your next trip to Radelaide. You will be required to wear a big thick gold necklace and dark sunnies. And the hat of course. And no smiling either.thejiggingsaint wrote:2020-2022? God almighty! I'm 72 NOW! Can I last to 75-77? ( particularly in hostile environments like yesterday's?!) oh well, will just have to try my best!Linton Lodger wrote:Good summation, although I disagree with your window. I know its dependent on who comes onto our List, but I think anything could happen from next year. Next year will see about 10 players on our list hit the 50-70 game mark and about another 4 hit the 30-50 game mark after another pre season.BackFromUSA wrote:What our players should learn:
1) Billy had to either get the ball forward or stop the classic flip over the back for the run around - this is a standard ZONE play in forward moves - as an ex ruckman it kills me to see our young rucks make this mistake. Billy had his positioning all wrong at this boundary throw in and his one job was to ensure the ball didn't go to the classic attacking zone. He could have given away a free kick and we would have been better off!
2) Seb had to ensure he was protecting the space that Gray wanted to run into at the back of the hit out - he should have been hassling him with a hard tag and restricting his run rather than trying to win the ball and clearing it
3) Luke had to be ready to be ready to step into (block) the run of Gray if he released (which he did) but Luke was flat footed
4) Billings tried to tackle but was too late (but he was third in line for Gray responsibility at that contest)
5) Worst of all was Blake - he was unmanned in the space where Gray would run into at the 50m arc and instead of remaining and protecting the dangerous space 50m from goal ... he ran to the contest on the ATTACKING side looking for the forward tap! Even if he leaves the dangerous space, if he had run to the defensive side of the ruck contest (behind) then he could have put pressure on Gray.
Bottom line is that none of these guys have played 100 games of footy - not even close. All in the 30-60 game zone.
They will all learn from it.
This season is exactly as i thought it would be.
I maintain that our real premiership window is 2020-22.
We can make finals next year 2018.
We can be top 4 in 2019.
IF we keep this list together and recruit well.
Welcome to the era of the "Gangsta-Jigster"!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
- Location: incarnate
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Good analysis.
I thought it was a short throw in from the umpire and Billy was just caught behind.
Also it seemed to me Billings was his closest opponent
I thought it was a short throw in from the umpire and Billy was just caught behind.
Also it seemed to me Billings was his closest opponent
Nee!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
I can't believe the goal line footage was not seen anywhere. They say they review every goal but do they? Everyone seemed to be caught up in the moment but I wouldn't mind seeing the goal line footage. Does anyone know where it can be found?The_President wrote:I haven't seen anyone show a close up, slow-mo or even still shots of the goal yet. Skunk must've been only just over the line. Foxtel didn't even show a replay of it.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 363 times
Re: Analysing "that" final goal
Jacks Back wrote:I can't believe the goal line footage was not seen anywhere. They say they review every goal but do they? Everyone seemed to be caught up in the moment but I wouldn't mind seeing the goal line footage. Does anyone know where it can be found?The_President wrote:I haven't seen anyone show a close up, slow-mo or even still shots of the goal yet. Skunk must've been only just over the line. Foxtel didn't even show a replay of it.
I saw it on Fox. Yes, it was over the line but not much in it.