Cotchin a fine?

[widereceiver]

WTH?
He's leading a charmed life.

[Vazelos]

Tries to play the hard nut he is over rated...
His luck will run up...

[perfectionist]

Fair enough - we got a 50 - and we were on our way!

[Bernard Shakey]

What's the big deal? That's all it deserves!

[Con Gorozidis]

I despise Cotchin.
Just cant stand him.
Hate the way he plays the game. Hate his personality.

[I love the saints!]

All it deserves? After Tim copped 2 weeks for an accident?

[The Fireman]

I despise Cotchin.
Just cant stand him.
Hate the way he plays the game. Hate his personality.

I hate his hair.

[St Chris]

It was exactly the same as Jack Steven's hit on Ballantyne the week before - a dumb thing to do which gives absolutely zero advantage to your team.

They both get fines for being idiots, but that's it - nothing further.

Remember our fury when Gehrig would get a week of for punching someone in the guts, when the rules were different?? Lets not go back to those times.

[terry smith rules]

Steven and Cotchin now both on two for the year, one more is an automatic week. As Easton wood just got !! A week for stupidity for any of them.

[spiral3]

I hate his hair.

haha, seconded, looks like an uncool cartoon character

[Milne]

All it deserves? After Tim copped 2 weeks for an accident?

Tim has no intent but the act was dangerous and caused the Richmond player to sit out the rest of the game. Unlucky but deserved the two weeks.

[Jacks Back]

Steven and Cotchin now both on two for the year, one more is an automatic week. As Easton wood just got !! A week for stupidity for any of them.

If they get one more fine and then take a week off are they still eligible for the Brownlow as the third misdemeanor would still be technically a fine?

[Rosco]

Steven and Cotchin now both on two for the year, one more is an automatic week. As Easton wood just got !! A week for stupidity for any of them.

If they get one more fine and then take a week off are they still eligible for the Brownlow as the third misdemeanor would still be technically a fine?

Ineligible if that happens. But not likely to win anyway.

[Jacks Back]

Steven and Cotchin now both on two for the year, one more is an automatic week. As Easton wood just got !! A week for stupidity for any of them.

If they get one more fine and then take a week off are they still eligible for the Brownlow as the third misdemeanor would still be technically a fine?

Ineligible if that happens. But not likely to win anyway.

Okay thanks.

Maybe they should drop the fairest aspect so it doesn't disqualify anyone from winning the Brownlow if they're suspended - they'll just have less games to get the votes.

[Rosco]

Steven and Cotchin now both on two for the year, one more is an automatic week. As Easton wood just got !! A week for stupidity for any of them.

If they get one more fine and then take a week off are they still eligible for the Brownlow as the third misdemeanor would still be technically a fine?

Ineligible if that happens. But not likely to win anyway.

Okay thanks.

Maybe they should drop the fairest aspect so it doesn't disqualify anyone from winning the Brownlow if they're suspended - they'll just have less games to get the votes.

You sound like KB. It's not really best and fairest anyway, it's best and fair, or even best and didn't miss at least a week suspended.

If you go for three of these in a year I reckon you blow Brownlow eligibility IMO.

[Jacks Back]

I'm sick of players not getting their right whack when they might be a brownlow favourite like Fyfe the other year, Cotchin previously and a few others just so the afl don't look foolish on the night.