Tim Membery

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6347
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683774Post Sainter_Dad »

So one from left field, is it a chance to play Hickey as a forward/2nd ruck? We know he can mark and his kicking is not too bad - and he would not be getting the best defender!


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683775Post saynta »

St Loxton wrote:Hoping he only gets a week for that (slightly) late knock.
Will possibly get 2 though.
Was a great target tonight, strong marking, great kicking.

Will be missed.

Cmon Paddy over to you, back yourself.

Spelling?


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6611
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1340 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683792Post Jacks Back »

Premium89 wrote:
SaintPav wrote:2 or 3 weeks after the downgrade.

This is gong to stuff us up a bit.

The options are Paddy or Josh Battle.

Maybe Carlisle forward if need be?
Carlisle to swing forward, back and everywhere else to help us get across the line against his old team!!
Sandy are playing Marshall in the back line. Maybe he can come in as a back and Carlisle can go forward and, if need be, they can swap around as required. Otherwise Battle as the straight swap for Membrey and see what he's got (after maybe half a match at Sandy today due to the 5 day break).


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683798Post kosifantutti »

Looks bad but Saints should argue that initial contact was hip to body and forearm contact was incidental. Most damage from face hitting ground.

Waleed Aly on Offsiders said it was one of those that looked worse in slow motion than it really was. Possible character witness?


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8786
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683799Post Otiman »

I think Marshall is doing his backline apprenticeship before he becomes a permanent forward/ruck. If he turns out to be a better defender than forward, I've got no issues sending Carlisle forward.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683801Post samuraisaint »

Sainter_Dad wrote:So one from left field, is it a chance to play Hickey as a forward/2nd ruck? We know he can mark and his kicking is not too bad - and he would not be getting the best defender!
This.

I was just about to post this suggestion myself. Hickey has kicked goals for us in the past, notably in a game against GWS at Docklands, and was played as a forward at Gold Coast - most notably in a game against Collingwood at the G. Probably not as a long term forward option, but could fill the void for a couple of weeks until Membrey comes back in. At least that will allow for Longer to get a chop out in the ruck, and it enables Gilbert to not have to assume ruck duties where the potential for injury is ever present.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683804Post 8856brother »

I personally thought it looked pretty ordinary and wont be surprised if it goes straight to the tribunal. If that was a Richmond player getting Geary or Gilbert that way we would be up in arms. He's lucky Grimes got up and wasnt stretched off.

If he gets less than 4 he'll be a lucky boy. Didn't like it.

Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683806Post bigcarl »

samuraisaint wrote:
Sainter_Dad wrote:So one from left field, is it a chance to play Hickey as a forward/2nd ruck? We know he can mark and his kicking is not too bad - and he would not be getting the best defender!
This.

I was just about to post this suggestion myself. Hickey has kicked goals for us in the past, notably in a game against GWS at Docklands, and was played as a forward at Gold Coast - most notably in a game against Collingwood at the G. Probably not as a long term forward option, but could fill the void for a couple of weeks until Membrey comes back in. At least that will allow for Longer to get a chop out in the ruck, and it enables Gilbert to not have to assume ruck duties where the potential for injury is ever present.
Not the worst idea. You'd think we'd be able to dominate the rucks with those two in tandem.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683815Post SaintPav »

8856brother wrote:I personally thought it looked pretty ordinary and wont be surprised if it goes straight to the tribunal. If that was a Richmond player getting Geary or Gilbert that way we would be up in arms. He's lucky Grimes got up and wasnt stretched off.

If he gets less than 4 he'll be a lucky boy. Didn't like it.

Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk
Have you watched the incident multiple times or are you going on first impression?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683827Post 8856brother »

SaintPav wrote:
8856brother wrote:I personally thought it looked pretty ordinary and wont be surprised if it goes straight to the tribunal. If that was a Richmond player getting Geary or Gilbert that way we would be up in arms. He's lucky Grimes got up and wasnt stretched off.

If he gets less than 4 he'll be a lucky boy. Didn't like it.

Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk
Have you watched the incident multiple times or are you going on first impression?
It hasn't changed the 10 times I've seen it replayed. Not sure how we can excuse it. Joey just gave him a couple of weeks off on TFS.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 999
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683830Post SinCitySainter »

I think if he gets 2 or 3 he should just take it and move on.

He got him in the head and he ended up concussed. That is pretty much the story of the tape he will go for it.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683832Post dragit »

bigcarl wrote:
samuraisaint wrote:
Sainter_Dad wrote:So one from left field, is it a chance to play Hickey as a forward/2nd ruck? We know he can mark and his kicking is not too bad - and he would not be getting the best defender!
This.

I was just about to post this suggestion myself. Hickey has kicked goals for us in the past, notably in a game against GWS at Docklands, and was played as a forward at Gold Coast - most notably in a game against Collingwood at the G. Probably not as a long term forward option, but could fill the void for a couple of weeks until Membrey comes back in. At least that will allow for Longer to get a chop out in the ruck, and it enables Gilbert to not have to assume ruck duties where the potential for injury is ever present.
Not the worst idea. You'd think we'd be able to dominate the rucks with those two in tandem.
Nah, Essendon are a quick side too so I think we'll be shredded for pace if we go in with 2 rucks.


Milne
Club Player
Posts: 1392
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:15pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683834Post Milne »

It wasn't intentional but the AFL has said that they want to protect the head, and Membery smashed straight through his head.

2 weeks is a good outcome with an early plea.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683838Post saintsRrising »

Just watched the video for the first time.

That raised elbow will see him go.
3 weeks reduced to 2 if we are lucky.

Losing Tim for the next two weeks will be a real blow. We have no like for like replacement for him.

Most likely they will bring Paddy back.

Alternatively we just go with a smaller forward line.

So no Tim and Jim for the Dons game.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683839Post saintsRrising »

carn_sainter wrote:I say it every week, but Tim Membrey judges the ball in flight as good as anyone in the comp.


I was thinking this exact thing during the game last night. He is always exactly where the ball is going irrespective of what everyone else is doing. This often allows him to outmark taller opponents.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683842Post fugazi »

Hope for 1, more likely 2


Nee!
kazonte13
Club Player
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed 15 Feb 2012 12:51am

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683847Post kazonte13 »

Couple of weeks for Members ,is Battle ready to show us his stuff ,see how he goes today .


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683852Post saynta »

Devilhead wrote:Didn't look good - at least 2

Yes, I'm sorry to say. :cry:


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683859Post SaintPav »

He either gets 2 or it goes to the tribunal.

It depends if it gets graded as careless or intentional.

It's fairly black and white.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683862Post longtimesaint »

I think it was careless as it seems out of character.
It appears he was flying for the mark and realized he could not get it and turned to brace for contact.


One year will be our year
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683867Post dragit »

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-07-09/p ... e-big-bans

Membrey is facing the harshest suspension of the round so far after arriving late to a contest and planting his forearm into the face of Richmond defender Dylan Grimes on Saturday night.

I think this description is wrong, I don't think you can be considered late to a contest if you would have taken a chest mark. Membreys timing was perfect to take the ball as it is in most contests.

Grimes courageously put himself in a very dangerous position running back with the flight of the ball giving himself zero protection from the contest. Very hard to pull up mid air when you are flying for a mark, but unfortunately in protecting himself Membrey has taken Grimes out. No malice or intent to injure though.

3 down to 2.

Cotchin deserves a week for stupidity, if they start handing out 1 week bans for all punches off the ball then we could get rid of this blight on the game.


Proph3t of egan
Club Player
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683871Post Proph3t of egan »

Absolutely no way he goes to the tribunal. Reckless, head high contact, high impact. Surely that's only 3 down to 2. If he goes to the tribunal along the same lines as the Houli and Bugg punches that weren't in play, the systems broke.


Fortius quo Fidelius means Strength through Loyalty. . . I think
Proph3t of egan
Club Player
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683874Post Proph3t of egan »

Surely we bring in Acres as Membrey replacement. Can play 3rd tall and doesn't mess up our structure like other replacements would. Can also take a clunk or two


Fortius quo Fidelius means Strength through Loyalty. . . I think
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683899Post perfectionist »

Careless, high impact and high contact - 3 weeks or 2 with a guilty plea.


23Buckets
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue 15 Jul 2014 1:11pm

Re: Tim Membery

Post: # 1683900Post 23Buckets »

Proph3t of egan wrote:Absolutely no way he goes to the tribunal. Reckless, head high contact, high impact. Surely that's only 3 down to 2. If he goes to the tribunal along the same lines as the Houli and Bugg punches that weren't in play, the systems broke.
Agree. Only thing that goes against him is he takes his eye off the ball while in the air and ends up leading with his elbow. Side note disgraceful umpiring that it wasn't 50..


Post Reply