Changes v Tigers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682796Post SMS »

If Gilbert doesn get up we are screwed.

Cant see us winning. 6 day break from perth and webster our quarterback is out.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682802Post meher baba »

ace wrote:Webster out (managed by AFL)
Weller out (managed)
Dunstan out (managed)

Rice in
Savage in
Battle in

Paddy (diabetes unmanaged)
I didn't know diabetes would cause a player to be heeedless of danger to his head in a contest. That's a skill deficit, not a health problem IMO.

Battle? Surely you jest. Where would he play?


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682806Post saintspremiers »

meher baba wrote:
ace wrote:Webster out (managed by AFL)
Weller out (managed)
Dunstan out (managed)

Rice in
Savage in
Battle in

Paddy (diabetes unmanaged)
I didn't know diabetes would cause a player to be heeedless of danger to his head in a contest. That's a skill deficit, not a health problem IMO.

Battle? Surely you jest. Where would he play?
Paddy. Diabetes. Head injuries. Mismanagement. Please insert a pic of the biggest can of worms known to mankind. And pass the popcorn.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8394
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1913 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682929Post WellardSaint »

Do they put someone fit and athletic on Rance?

If Gilbo is fit, maybe put him on Rance as a hard tag, defensive forward.
He can nullify the rebound of Rance.
It wouild certainly screw up Hardwick's tactics

Jimmy Webster replaced by Savage
Gilbo's normal role to be done by maybe Rice (tony74 said Rice was planned for the Dockers game)


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682936Post White Winmar »

Carlisle forward. Tigers have a small forward setup with only the lesser Riewoldt up there. Leave him to Brown. Jake the snake forward to kick a bag. We need a point of difference, a weapon, a surprise. That surprise is Jake.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3638
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682938Post saintbob »

Out: Lonie, Longer, Dunstanand Webster

In:Hickey, Savage, Freeman and Acres


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682964Post borderbarry »

No place for Rice saintbob?


longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682970Post longtimesaint »

saintbob wrote:Out: Lonie, Longer, Dunstanand Webster

In:Hickey, Savage, Freeman and Acres
We have won 3 in s row and there is no need for that many changes.
Savage or McKenzie for Webster.


One year will be our year
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682972Post meher baba »

longtimesaint wrote:
saintbob wrote:Out: Lonie, Longer, Dunstanand Webster

In:Hickey, Savage, Freeman and Acres
We have won 3 in s row and there is no need for that many changes.
Savage or McKenzie for Webster.
Correct that there won't be that many changes, barring injury problems that occur in training and/or we don't know about.

Unless the club has given up completely on Savage - which seems unlikely given that he was named in the extended squad for the game against the Suns - then he has to come in for Webster on the basis that:

1. It's a role he could reasonably be expected to fill
2. It's a big game which we desperately want to win, and in such games you tend to go with experienced players over debutants or fringe players.
3. Savage was more or less BOG for the Zebras on Sunday.

Beyond Savage for Webster, there is the possibility of Gilbert being rested for precautionary reasons, in which case DMac would be a chance, or, more likely IMO, Acres.

And I reckon that would be it. Yes, Mav has been playing poorly, and if Webster had been available we might have seen Savage come in for Mav. But I don't think that will happen now.

Fact is, nobody other than Savage and Hickey are knocking down the door at the Zebras. I reckon Hickey might be back for the key games at the end of the year, but Longer is fitting in well ATM.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
Gershwin
Club Player
Posts: 1558
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
Location: NE Victoria
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682977Post Gershwin »

meher baba wrote:
longtimesaint wrote:
saintbob wrote:Out: Lonie, Longer, Dunstanand Webster

In:Hickey, Savage, Freeman and Acres
We have won 3 in s row and there is no need for that many changes.
Savage or McKenzie for Webster.
Correct that there won't be that many changes, barring injury problems that occur in training and/or we don't know about.

Unless the club has given up completely on Savage - which seems unlikely given that he was named in the extended squad for the game against the Suns - then he has to come in for Webster on the basis that:

1. It's a role he could reasonably be expected to fill
2. It's a big game which we desperately want to win, and in such games you tend to go with experienced players over debutants or fringe players.
3. Savage was more or less BOG for the Zebras on Sunday.

Beyond Savage for Webster, there is the possibility of Gilbert being rested for precautionary reasons, in which case DMac would be a chance, or, more likely IMO, Acres.

And I reckon that would be it. Yes, Mav has been playing poorly, and if Webster had been available we might have seen Savage come in for Mav. But I don't think that will happen now.

Fact is, nobody other than Savage and Hickey are knocking down the door at the Zebras. I reckon Hickey might be back for the key games at the end of the year, but Longer is fitting in well ATM.
Don't know that Freeman can knock any louder but this weekend is not the game to pick him.


summertime and the living is easy ........
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682982Post dragit »

Beating bottom four sides doesn't necessarily mean you are going that well…

Mav's incredibly average year got even worse last week, but he seems untouchable.

Let's get McKenzie & Acres back in the side.

The reality is that Longer was toweled up last week by a 19 year old, second gamer.

Hickey needs to come in to try and negate Nankervis who is a beast around the ground - he had as many kicks last week as Longer has had so far this entire year.

I'd rather we lose the hitouts and have Hickey get 15 touches and a goal.

Dunstan 11 touches - Steele was dropped for a similar game a few weeks back, probably lucky there are no mids banging the door down.

In:
Acres, McKenzie, Hickey

Out:
Weller/Dunstan, Webster, Longer


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682994Post meher baba »

dragit wrote:Let's get McKenzie & Acres back in the side.
McKenzie even though he had a very poor game for the Zebras and Savage stood out?

Would this send the right message? It would only if the message is: "pack your bags Savage, we don't want you any more." I don't know whether or not that's where the club is going to end up, but the standard practice of AFL clubs is to send this message at the point in a season at which they are certain that they won't need the player any more: eg, when it's certain where they are going to finish on the table.

It's a big game on Saturday night. Why wouldn't we want to pick the most in-form players? On that basis, it's got to be Savage for Webster, and I can understand - although I wouldn't support - the idea of Hickey for Longer. Hickey and Savage played well on Sunday. So did Freeman, but we've been told that he isn't going to play AFL this year. If that's changed, I'm not sure that such a crunch match is the one to try him out in.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682996Post dragit »

meher baba wrote:
dragit wrote:Let's get McKenzie & Acres back in the side.
McKenzie even though he had a very poor game for the Zebras and Savage stood out?

Would this send the right message? It would only if the message is: "pack your bags Savage, we don't want you any more."
I reckon it's probably curtains for Shane, so we are wasting time by playing him… his 4 games at AFL level this year were pretty average for a guy in his prime.

1 good game in the VFL isn't enough for mine, he had 13 touches 2 games prior.

I thought McKenzie was good in his 2 games and was stiff to be dropped, we need to get games into him.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1682997Post meher baba »

dragit wrote: I thought McKenzie was good in his 2 games and was stiff to be dropped, we need to get games into him.
I'm not sure that he was that good really. While he had 20 disposals and 6 tackles against Sydney, my recollection is that he looked tremendously uncertain with the ball coming out of defence: turning it over on a few occasions and also kicking it to a player in a worse position on several more. My recollection is that he went a bit better in the Dogs game, although his stats weren't outstanding: 17 disposals, 3 tackles and 1 goal. He was then dropped for Webster coming back, so it's a bit unclear what the coach and football department thought of his performance. It's possible that they see him as the understudy for Webster, in which case he'll be selected and prove me wrong.

Otherwise, I think it has to be Savage. If you've read any of my other posts, you will be aware that I don't buy the "get games into them" concept. In my view, you go with the best available talent every time unless and until you reach at a point in the season in which it is no longer imperative for you to win every game.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683005Post dragit »

I'm not into playing young guys for the sake of it either, but McKenzie (21 - 18 games) is ahead of Savage (26 - 115 games) in every measure going on their limited chances at AFL level this year.

Savage had 13 disposals at VFL level the week before last.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683014Post saintsRrising »

DMak 2017 has been a shadow of DMak 2016 unfortunately.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683016Post dragit »

saintsRrising wrote:DMak 2017 has been a shadow of DMak 2016 unfortunately.
What was he doing so much better last year?

He's only played 18 games, it will take him time to adjust to the tempo. His only two games were against last years grand finalists.

Image


Brunswicksainter
Club Player
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon 15 May 2017 7:18pm
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683020Post Brunswicksainter »

There has never been a worse player than billy longer to pull on the red, black and white.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683022Post saintspremiers »

saintsRrising wrote:DMak 2017 has been a shadow of DMak 2016 unfortunately.
Agree.

I have my doubts of DMac is any good TBH


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683023Post shrodes »

dragit wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:DMak 2017 has been a shadow of DMak 2016 unfortunately.
What was he doing so much better last year?

He's only played 18 games, it will take him time to adjust to the tempo. His only two games were against last years grand finalists.

Image
Only thing I noticed was that he looked very nervous and a bit rushed... That will only improve if we play him


User avatar
St Loxton
Club Player
Posts: 1232
Joined: Mon 02 Feb 2009 9:50pm
Location: Jindivick
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683025Post St Loxton »

Brunswicksainter wrote:There has never been a worse player than billy longer to pull on the red, black and white.

Thats pretty harsh mate, Adam Pattinson was quite awful.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3385
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683029Post older saint »

Perhaps with Savage its time to move him to wing or half forward as foot skills are good but too loose in defence and gets lost in the game at times


longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683031Post longtimesaint »

older saint wrote:Perhaps with Savage its time to move him to wing or half forward as foot skills are good but too loose in defence and gets lost in the game at times
Who is going to play Webster's role as a running back line player?


One year will be our year
User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6084
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683035Post MC Gusto »

I'd like to see either Rice or Mckenzie in for Jweb and acres in for gilbert if injured and if not injured acres in for Mav!


#1 Ryder fan
User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6084
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Changes v Tigers

Post: # 1683036Post MC Gusto »

Don't see any upside to playing Savage. He's a good clubman and a reasonable player but he's not the future and we are not playing for the flag. Better off getting games into the kids - I really want to see more of wright (he seemed really at home with the pace of afl in
The 1 game he's played) dmack and would like to see rice and freezer!!


#1 Ryder fan
Post Reply