Aftermath
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1215 times
Aftermath
They're pretty gutted. Gave everything. Thought the Gameplan and coaching deserved a tick. Will wait till the review to decide if a chat with umpiring is needed. Jack S is not well. If anyone here doesn't think that the players didn't give 100% you don't deserve to call yourself a supporter. They're hurting as much if not more than you.
Keep the faith.
Keep the faith.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Aftermath
Effort was bloody immense. They were lunatics out there. No question about that. 22 lunatics with no regard for their safety.tony74 wrote:They're pretty gutted. Gave everything. Thought the Gameplan and coaching deserved a tick. Will wait till the review to decide if a chat with umpiring is needed. Jack S is not well. If anyone here doesn't think that the players didn't give 100% you don't deserve to call yourself a supporter. They're hurting as much if not more than you.
Keep the faith.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Aftermath
Agree as I have already posted elsewhere, effort, gameplan etc were all very good.tony74 wrote:They're pretty gutted. Gave everything. Thought the Gameplan and coaching deserved a tick. Will wait till the review to decide if a chat with umpiring is needed. Jack S is not well. If anyone here doesn't think that the players didn't give 100% you don't deserve to call yourself a supporter. They're hurting as much if not more than you.
Keep the faith.
We just lacked a bit of polish at times.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Aftermath
Let's hope Jack S is not out too long,
Agree that composure let us down, no doubt aggravated by the ludicrous free kick count.
You get pinged if you touch them. Thrice the number of kicks FFS. We must be tackling them too roughly.
Perhaps the umpires, if we decide to approach them, can give some tips on the correct tackling technique and where we are going wrong.
Agree that composure let us down, no doubt aggravated by the ludicrous free kick count.
You get pinged if you touch them. Thrice the number of kicks FFS. We must be tackling them too roughly.
Perhaps the umpires, if we decide to approach them, can give some tips on the correct tackling technique and where we are going wrong.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Aftermath
Thanks Tony. They tried their guts out. That was obvious. Effort was awesome.tony74 wrote:They're pretty gutted. Gave everything. Thought the Gameplan and coaching deserved a tick. Will wait till the review to decide if a chat with umpiring is needed. Jack S is not well. If anyone here doesn't think that the players didn't give 100% you don't deserve to call yourself a supporter. They're hurting as much if not more than you.
Keep the faith.
The rest will come.
We have faith.
Devastated to hear about Jack. Pretty hard to be a game winning onfield leader with a punctured lung. But he kept going anyway.
Always loyal
- carn_sainter
- Club Player
- Posts: 1470
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:49pm
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Aftermath
Big ticks for me, tony. Always appreciate your input. We turned up to play and played without a lapse in effort, always kept punching back and responding in very adverse conditions (crowd, ground, umps) until we simply ran out of legs.tony74 wrote:They're pretty gutted. Gave everything. Thought the Gameplan and coaching deserved a tick. Will wait till the review to decide if a chat with umpiring is needed. Jack S is not well. If anyone here doesn't think that the players didn't give 100% you don't deserve to call yourself a supporter. They're hurting as much if not more than you.
Keep the faith.
Very brave and gutsy effort for as long as there was gas in the tank. Near manic pressure and willingness to get involved. Besides the last 15 minutes, it really was a full 4 quarter effort. So 3 and a half, I guess.
The skills were way too sloppy though. Missed shots on goal hurt, but we also killed our own transition several times with terrible skills. Missed field passes of 30m, not hitting guys on the lead, turning our possession and fast ball movement into a throw-in, stoppage or eagle possession. That's what really hurt us. We butchered a lot of shots on goal but could have had about 10-12 more as well.
It wasn't all bad. We did switch the ball well and choose good patterns and speed of ball movement, but the disposal killed us as much as the umps did.
And the umpiring was awful. At least 3 goals to the eagles on very, very soft and dubious calls. It's not the raw count of frees for and against that annoys me, it's the imbalance of what is called, where, and the cost of them.
- prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Aftermath
They played awesomely considering, they just kicked too many behinds but the umpiring was a f**king disgrace Tony. Umpiring like that would cause a riot in some other sports.tony74 wrote:They're pretty gutted. Gave everything. Thought the Gameplan and coaching deserved a tick. Will wait till the review to decide if a chat with umpiring is needed. Jack S is not well. If anyone here doesn't think that the players didn't give 100% you don't deserve to call yourself a supporter. They're hurting as much if not more than you.
Keep the faith.
Re: Aftermath
Tony,
They are expected to give 100%
Why would that be in question? Do they ever not??
These guys get paid from 90-700k to play footy, they train for 10 months a year, 3-5 days a week. They are elite athletes, they are coached by elite coaches.
They played well, yes!
But to say they gave 100% is folly, it's a given.
All they did not do was execute, to capitalise on their clearance dominance.
They are expected to give 100%
Why would that be in question? Do they ever not??
These guys get paid from 90-700k to play footy, they train for 10 months a year, 3-5 days a week. They are elite athletes, they are coached by elite coaches.
They played well, yes!
But to say they gave 100% is folly, it's a given.
All they did not do was execute, to capitalise on their clearance dominance.
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5940
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Aftermath
It is going to be a new look St. Kilda outfit which takes on Brisbane next Sunday.
Riewoldt - knee
Dempster - concussion
Armitage - groin
Steven - punctured lung
Stevens - gastro (lost 7 kilos apparently)
Reckon we could use Longer in the ruck this week to compliment Hickey - and let Hickey rest up forward as another tall forward marking option. Playing Bruce in the ruck is not the answer.
Bring Long in to replace Steven in the midfield.
Long and Longer!
Riewoldt - knee
Dempster - concussion
Armitage - groin
Steven - punctured lung
Stevens - gastro (lost 7 kilos apparently)
Reckon we could use Longer in the ruck this week to compliment Hickey - and let Hickey rest up forward as another tall forward marking option. Playing Bruce in the ruck is not the answer.
Bring Long in to replace Steven in the midfield.
Long and Longer!
Last edited by samuraisaint on Sun 02 Apr 2017 9:38am, edited 3 times in total.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Aftermath
BigMart wrote:Tony,
They are expected to give 100%
Why would that be in question? Do they ever not??
These guys get paid from 90-700k to play footy, they train for 10 months a year, 3-5 days a week. They are elite athletes, they are coached by elite coaches.
They played well, yes!
But to say they gave 100% is folly, it's a given.
All they did not do was execute, to capitalise on their clearance dominance.
clap clap. Best post I have read post game. They should damn well be giving that
every week! Personally, increasingly to me, footballers are just over and paid Neanderthals.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Aftermath
Ok heros you play in Perth against 22 plus 3 maggots and a hostile uneducated crowd of morons in 29 degree heat for the whole first half and sun and see how you fare?iwantmeseats wrote:BigMart wrote:Tony,
They are expected to give 100%
Why would that be in question? Do they ever not??
These guys get paid from 90-700k to play footy, they train for 10 months a year, 3-5 days a week. They are elite athletes, they are coached by elite coaches.
They played well, yes!
But to say they gave 100% is folly, it's a given.
All they did not do was execute, to capitalise on their clearance dominance.
clap clap. Best post I have read post game. They should damn well be giving that
every week! Personally, increasingly to me, footballers are just over and paid Neanderthals.
The effort was there almost the whole game.
They could've slowed down in the third due to heat exhaustion/being spent early but the boys found a second,third and fourth wind and kept battling under adversity.
To have so many scoring shots in Perth is incredible. That's a massive positive and something that can set up our season even though we are 0-2.
Unfortunately, Brisbane appear to have improved a fair bit and are unlikely to be easy beats next week but we will win and win comfortably.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Aftermath
Great effort but just worries me how much we rely on that effort and supportive runs to keep chaining the ball. We look great when we are doing that, but in the last qtr WC locked us in with a hard press and we didn't have the skill to work it out. It's hard to play at that incredible effort every week - after last week they obviously want to atone and so are highly revved up. It's more you want to be at 95% with a good system and skills to get it done that lets you really wind up when you need to. 0
Definitely a good bounce back after being flat last week. But like last week it doesn't define our season. How do we go against Brissy - no gimme anymore - and Collingwood desperate to get wins. WE'll have a bit more of an idea of our form and depth after that.
Definitely a good bounce back after being flat last week. But like last week it doesn't define our season. How do we go against Brissy - no gimme anymore - and Collingwood desperate to get wins. WE'll have a bit more of an idea of our form and depth after that.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: Aftermath
Two ruck men next week please.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: Aftermath
Two ruck men next week please.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
Re: Aftermath
Great effort by the boys and the coaches.
What a difference from last week, inspirational stuff..
We ran out of steam in the end. So do we get fitter or slow it down for a couple of minutes each quarter?
What a difference from last week, inspirational stuff..
We ran out of steam in the end. So do we get fitter or slow it down for a couple of minutes each quarter?
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
Re: Aftermath
Not execute?iwantmeseats wrote:BigMart wrote:Tony,
They are expected to give 100%
Why would that be in question? Do they ever not??
These guys get paid from 90-700k to play footy, they train for 10 months a year, 3-5 days a week. They are elite athletes, they are coached by elite coaches.
They played well, yes!
But to say they gave 100% is folly, it's a given.
All they did not do was execute, to capitalise on their clearance dominance.
Of course they didn't execute. They're professional athletes, for you two say that it's obvious that they gave/give a hundred percent is obvious.
Is it nt obvious?
People make such grandiose statements sometimes...
Do you know why they didn't execute..
The boys played ok, but they'll need to do better.
Gresham is not a star.
It doesn't even need to be said
I don't even need to be saying this right now
Re: Aftermath
sorry just felt like trying out a different posting style.
It didn't feel good
I'm glad I can actually enjoy footy.
Great effort by the boys, it would be nice to win those ones but the signs are good, and they've bought into the gameplan, which I worried about after last week.
It didn't feel good
I'm glad I can actually enjoy footy.
Great effort by the boys, it would be nice to win those ones but the signs are good, and they've bought into the gameplan, which I worried about after last week.
Last edited by RODOS on Sun 02 Apr 2017 11:19am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Aftermath
The 4 reasons we lost;
1. Sloppy kicking, both in field and for goal
2. Fumbling the ball.
3. Dropped marks in the backline.
4. Cheating umpire maggots.
1. Sloppy kicking, both in field and for goal
2. Fumbling the ball.
3. Dropped marks in the backline.
4. Cheating umpire maggots.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Aftermath
Dunno about that. Melbourne's skills are a class above those of the Weagles.The Fireman wrote:would have beaten Melb last week with effort
The thing about being skillful - eg being able to hit a target or take a mark - is that you don't have to waste energy trying to do it all again through the retrieval process. We saw that last week with the Dees. Once they got possession, they kept it with minimal effort. Of course, a zone defence system plays into the hands of a team who can dispose of the ball with either foot with precision. The Weagles were poor at getting the ball in the first two quarters - allowing the umps to their work for them. It's the frees we don't get that hurt with players thrown from the contest , pushed in the back or grabbed to prevent run. Not so with the Weagles. Shuey and Gaff started to get clearances as Hickey tired which got them back in the game. But was only in the last 15 minutes that they were able to use the ball with efficiency going forward.
Last edited by perfectionist on Sun 02 Apr 2017 11:23am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11354
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1349 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
Re: Aftermath
Absolutely. Our sometimes poor skill levels did not help, but neither did those little fluorescent cretins.saynta wrote:The 4 reasons we lost;
1. Sloppy kicking, both in field and for goal
2. Fumbling the ball.
3. Dropped marks in the backline.
4. Cheating umpire maggots.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 774 times
- Been thanked: 871 times
Re: Aftermath
iwantmeseats wrote:Insipid last quarter. No excuse for sub standard disposal. School boy stuff.
As I posted elsewhere, rack off and find another club to disparage you effen troll
Saint supporter since '62
Re: Aftermath
looking at the stats WC duckers had 9 players with more than 20 possessions. We had 3. 422 disposals to 361 in the end. We spent a lot of petrol tickets chasing and harassing.
We killed them with our direct ball movement early. But they started getting it first and holding it better to share it around and get players involved and keep their energy.
We killed them with our direct ball movement early. But they started getting it first and holding it better to share it around and get players involved and keep their energy.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Aftermath
Agree. This is the AFL. Most sides bring effort. But effort alone isnt enough. You also need skill and brains.saynta wrote:The 4 reasons we lost;
1. Sloppy kicking, both in field and for goal
2. Fumbling the ball.
3. Dropped marks in the backline.
4. Cheating umpire maggots.
Poor kicking is our major downfall. Has been for years now.