Hickey or Longer?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11241
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
What is the question?
Hickey is a footballer. Longer is a lumbering ruckman.
Tom is number 1
Hickey is a footballer. Longer is a lumbering ruckman.
Tom is number 1
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 768 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
If the selectors decide to play Longer in R1. They are wrong, end of story
Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)
Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before
Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)
Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Well after that game by Hickey there is now NO argument. He is a lock!
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Not according to Dermie. We have a decision to make.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Didn't Tony base that on the pre season , at that point.Bluthy wrote:From match thread
tony74 wrote:
Billy is no. 1
Seriously? AFter Hicks was top 5 last year? Billy has been good but not brilliant in these preseason games. Richo does love his big bodied, physical guys. I would be skeptical until R1 is selected. Richo could just be trying to get Hickey to take it to another level by telling him he's no. 2 presently. Unless they want to try Longer main ruck and Hickey in a fwd/relief ruck role. Hickey showed glimpses of that last year but wasn't particularly reliable. I'll believe Longer is 1 when I see it in round 1.
Nothing to do with last year, that is done and dusted, in case you hadn't noticed.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Hickey is Numero Uno
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
The head honchomagnifisaint wrote:Hickey is Numero Uno
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
On that basis we should have let Josh Battle fight it out with Riewoldt for a spot in the Round 1 team.Wayne42 wrote:Didn't Tony base that on the pre season , at that point.Bluthy wrote:From match thread
tony74 wrote:
Billy is no. 1
Seriously? AFter Hicks was top 5 last year? Billy has been good but not brilliant in these preseason games. Richo does love his big bodied, physical guys. I would be skeptical until R1 is selected. Richo could just be trying to get Hickey to take it to another level by telling him he's no. 2 presently. Unless they want to try Longer main ruck and Hickey in a fwd/relief ruck role. Hickey showed glimpses of that last year but wasn't particularly reliable. I'll believe Longer is 1 when I see it in round 1.
Nothing to do with last year, that is done and dusted, in case you hadn't noticed.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
So do we go with the ruckman who was brilliant tonight and beat Gawn twice last season or do we go with Longer who has shown not as much.....and whose game for Sandy this weekend was so so at best.kosifantutti wrote:Not according to Dermie. We have a decision to make.
Not really much of a decision I would have thought, but what do I know.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 440 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Hang on, what about Holmes who is second in line behind LongersaintsRrising wrote:So do we go with the ruckman who was brilliant tonight and beat Gawn twice last season or do we go with Longer who has shown not as much.....and whose game for Sandy this weekend was so so at best.kosifantutti wrote:Not according to Dermie. We have a decision to make.
Not really much of a decision I would have thought, but what do I know.
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
I was wrong Hickey is far far superior to Longer, I forgot how good he was last year.
Re: Hickey or Longer?
They're looking at the big picture which is about winning finals. Thats why Longer is still in the picture. Those powerful, physical rucks come into their own in finals where everything is congested and its harder to put it down the throat of onballers with clean takeaways. Longer is only 22 as well - those big rucks peak a lot later. Maybe we have Hickey win us our first flag, then Billy the next one and swapping from there on.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
End of argument. Surely. 29 disposals....for a ruckman.Playon wrote:If the selectors decide to play Longer in R1. They are wrong, end of story
Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)
Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
can't believe there ever was an argument. he won the spot well and truly last year, short of a dramatic form loss or injury it was his first up.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Re: Hickey or Longer?
If he wasn't best on ground he'd have to be close. I'd be happy if our midfielders had those stats minus the hitouts of course. But of the 39 hitouts, 10 to advantage says enough on its ownst.byron wrote:End of argument. Surely. 29 disposals....for a ruckman.Playon wrote:If the selectors decide to play Longer in R1. They are wrong, end of story
Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)
Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Hickey was. Very very good.
Maybe Richo threw out a challenge and was just testing all the ruckmen out to see who wanted it most, and who had improved off season. Made Hickey earn his spot on where he is and how hungry he was , rather than how good he was last year.
His game certainly stated "here I am take this off me" he dominated. I would be flabbergasted if the Hixter did not line up for another crack at Gawn.
Completion for spots is healthy.. should make Longer work harder for his chance, along with Holmes and Pierce .
Maybe Richo threw out a challenge and was just testing all the ruckmen out to see who wanted it most, and who had improved off season. Made Hickey earn his spot on where he is and how hungry he was , rather than how good he was last year.
His game certainly stated "here I am take this off me" he dominated. I would be flabbergasted if the Hixter did not line up for another crack at Gawn.
Completion for spots is healthy.. should make Longer work harder for his chance, along with Holmes and Pierce .
And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
I don't get how Longer can have been 'better' in the pre season.
Better in the weights room?
Longer needs to get a kick in real games and that includes the VFL.
Better in the weights room?
Longer needs to get a kick in real games and that includes the VFL.
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Think this thread can be closed. Should never have been opened. Amazing how we can forget the previous seasons form.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
I think it was only our coaches fell into that traplennyhaze wrote:Think this thread can be closed. Should never have been opened. Amazing how we can forget the previous seasons form.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Hickey or Longer?
I reckon this whole hickey vs longer balony is nothing more than to keep Melbourne guessing for rd 1. I couldn't be any more because I'd so far ahead of all our other rucks, it's ain't funny! If he continues on his upward trend from last season, he could be AA by years end!! And Richo still wouldn't categorically rule him a lock for rd 1 which confirms to me it's nothing more than old fashion selection smoke and mirrors!!
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Hickey or Longer?
Oh Hickey, you were so fine, you were so fine you blew my mind, oh Hickey, oh Hickey. Sorry Billy, don't be a hero. Round 1 belongs to Tom.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!