Hickey or Longer?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11241
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653678Post Bernard Shakey »

What is the question?

Hickey is a footballer. Longer is a lumbering ruckman.

Tom is number 1


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 768 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653680Post Goose is king »

10 clearances


Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653682Post Playon »

If the selectors decide to play Longer in R1. They are wrong, end of story

Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)

Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653687Post saintsRrising »

Well after that game by Hickey there is now NO argument. He is a lock!


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4951
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 497 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653688Post Moods »

Yep. I think Tom has all but buried this discussion. Thank God. That's the Hickey from 2016 and clearly our best ruckman on our list.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653706Post kosifantutti »

Not according to Dermie. We have a decision to make.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653709Post Wayne42 »

Bluthy wrote:From match thread

tony74 wrote:
Billy is no. 1


Seriously? AFter Hicks was top 5 last year? Billy has been good but not brilliant in these preseason games. Richo does love his big bodied, physical guys. I would be skeptical until R1 is selected. Richo could just be trying to get Hickey to take it to another level by telling him he's no. 2 presently. Unless they want to try Longer main ruck and Hickey in a fwd/relief ruck role. Hickey showed glimpses of that last year but wasn't particularly reliable. I'll believe Longer is 1 when I see it in round 1.
Didn't Tony base that on the pre season , at that point.

Nothing to do with last year, that is done and dusted, in case you hadn't noticed.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653721Post magnifisaint »

Hickey is Numero Uno


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6611
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1340 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653725Post Jacks Back »

magnifisaint wrote:Hickey is Numero Uno
The head honcho


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653728Post kosifantutti »

Wayne42 wrote:
Bluthy wrote:From match thread

tony74 wrote:
Billy is no. 1


Seriously? AFter Hicks was top 5 last year? Billy has been good but not brilliant in these preseason games. Richo does love his big bodied, physical guys. I would be skeptical until R1 is selected. Richo could just be trying to get Hickey to take it to another level by telling him he's no. 2 presently. Unless they want to try Longer main ruck and Hickey in a fwd/relief ruck role. Hickey showed glimpses of that last year but wasn't particularly reliable. I'll believe Longer is 1 when I see it in round 1.
Didn't Tony base that on the pre season , at that point.

Nothing to do with last year, that is done and dusted, in case you hadn't noticed.
On that basis we should have let Josh Battle fight it out with Riewoldt for a spot in the Round 1 team.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653730Post saintsRrising »

kosifantutti wrote:Not according to Dermie. We have a decision to make.
So do we go with the ruckman who was brilliant tonight and beat Gawn twice last season or do we go with Longer who has shown not as much.....and whose game for Sandy this weekend was so so at best.

Not really much of a decision I would have thought, but what do I know. :wink:


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 440 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653732Post shrodes »

saintsRrising wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:Not according to Dermie. We have a decision to make.
So do we go with the ruckman who was brilliant tonight and beat Gawn twice last season or do we go with Longer who has shown not as much.....and whose game for Sandy this weekend was so so at best.

Not really much of a decision I would have thought, but what do I know. :wink:
Hang on, what about Holmes who is second in line behind Longer :roll:


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653743Post Impatient Sainter »

I was wrong Hickey is far far superior to Longer, I forgot how good he was last year.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653749Post Bluthy »

They're looking at the big picture which is about winning finals. Thats why Longer is still in the picture. Those powerful, physical rucks come into their own in finals where everything is congested and its harder to put it down the throat of onballers with clean takeaways. Longer is only 22 as well - those big rucks peak a lot later. Maybe we have Hickey win us our first flag, then Billy the next one and swapping from there on.


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653755Post st.byron »

Playon wrote:If the selectors decide to play Longer in R1. They are wrong, end of story

Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)

Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before
End of argument. Surely. 29 disposals....for a ruckman. :shock: :shock: :shock:


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10431
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653757Post desertsaint »

can't believe there ever was an argument. he won the spot well and truly last year, short of a dramatic form loss or injury it was his first up.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653770Post Playon »

st.byron wrote:
Playon wrote:If the selectors decide to play Longer in R1. They are wrong, end of story

Saints ruckman Tom Hickey has dominated this game. He has 29 disposals, ten clearances, five tackles, four inside 50s and 39 hitouts (including ten to the advantage of a teammate)

Compared to Longers 5 disposals the week before
End of argument. Surely. 29 disposals....for a ruckman. :shock: :shock: :shock:
If he wasn't best on ground he'd have to be close. I'd be happy if our midfielders had those stats minus the hitouts of course. But of the 39 hitouts, 10 to advantage says enough on its own


supersaints
Club Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653773Post supersaints »

Hickey was. Very very good.
Maybe Richo threw out a challenge and was just testing all the ruckmen out to see who wanted it most, and who had improved off season. Made Hickey earn his spot on where he is and how hungry he was , rather than how good he was last year.
His game certainly stated "here I am take this off me" he dominated. I would be flabbergasted if the Hixter did not line up for another crack at Gawn.

Completion for spots is healthy.. should make Longer work harder for his chance, along with Holmes and Pierce .


And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf" 

Go Sainters !!!!!
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653778Post BigMart »

Hickey


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653782Post Con Gorozidis »

I don't get how Longer can have been 'better' in the pre season.
Better in the weights room?
Longer needs to get a kick in real games and that includes the VFL.


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6084
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653783Post MC Gusto »

What a game by Tom


#1 Ryder fan
lennyhaze
Club Player
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat 10 May 2014 11:09am

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653785Post lennyhaze »

Think this thread can be closed. Should never have been opened. Amazing how we can forget the previous seasons form.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653786Post skeptic »

lennyhaze wrote:Think this thread can be closed. Should never have been opened. Amazing how we can forget the previous seasons form.
I think it was only our coaches fell into that trap :shock:


Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653800Post Saint wagga »

I reckon this whole hickey vs longer balony is nothing more than to keep Melbourne guessing for rd 1. I couldn't be any more because I'd so far ahead of all our other rucks, it's ain't funny! If he continues on his upward trend from last season, he could be AA by years end!! And Richo still wouldn't categorically rule him a lock for rd 1 which confirms to me it's nothing more than old fashion selection smoke and mirrors!!


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Hickey or Longer?

Post: # 1653802Post White Winmar »

Oh Hickey, you were so fine, you were so fine you blew my mind, oh Hickey, oh Hickey. Sorry Billy, don't be a hero. Round 1 belongs to Tom.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Post Reply