Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
stonecold wrote:Hey Jax, see your online again, what do you know about big news about to come out of St.Kilda?????
Ok ..I get it now .. This was a question for Jax only and not meant for any of us mere mortals actually viewing this post !!!!!!
And you have also pm'd him the same question, perhaps because he might not read your pm's ?????
All a bit confusing !!!!!
Perhaps in future you could tell us all ...hey!!!! .... this question is for jaxons....read it if you must but don't question me about it !!!!! it's not meant for you lot !!!! it's for Jax only !!!! So there ???!!!>>>
stonecold wrote:Hey Jax, see your online again, what do you know about big news about to come out of St.Kilda?????
Ok ..I get it now .. This was a question for Jax only and not meant for any of us mere mortals actually viewing this post !!!!!!
And you have also pm'd him the same question, perhaps because he might not read your pm's ?????
All a bit confusing !!!!!
Perhaps in future you could tell us all ...hey!!!! .... this question is for jaxons....read it if you must but don't question me about it !!!!! it's not meant for you lot !!!! it's for Jax only !!!! So there ???!!!>>>
Read the start of the question, it say's 'Hey Jax', not rocket science really is it!!!!!!
Simple Minds????? If your name is not 'Jaxons', there's no need for you to answer or give an opinion!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!! We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
stonecold wrote:Hey Jax, see your online again, what do you know about big news about to come out of St.Kilda?????
Ok ..I get it now .. This was a question for Jax only and not meant for any of us mere mortals actually viewing this post !!!!!!
And you have also pm'd him the same question, perhaps because he might not read your pm's ?????
All a bit confusing !!!!!
Perhaps in future you could tell us all ...hey!!!! .... this question is for jaxons....read it if you must but don't question me about it !!!!! it's not meant for you lot !!!! it's for Jax only !!!! So there ???!!!>>>
Read the start of the question, it say's 'Hey Jax', not rocket science really is it!!!!!!
Simple Minds????? If your name is not 'Jaxons', there's no need for you to answer or give an opinion!!!!!
The OtherThommo wrote:Posted this @ E'dope, but one would think GWS would be factoring this in to their list thinking, should it go the wrong way (for them and Whitfield).
"The legal advice means the drugs body is briefed to consider its own independent move on the trio if the AFL does not lay charges.
The AFL has received legal advice and is deciding whether to lay charges of avoiding a performance-enhancing drugs test, which brings a mandatory minimum four-year penalty. The news that ASADA has sought legal advice separate to the AFL indicates it was preparing for the possibility of acting regardless of the AFL."
Lachie Whitfield will think twice before finding another girlfriend - 4 years and maybe all your footy career gone because an ex-girlfriend wanted revenge so dobbed you in.
fugazi wrote:To be fair, no-one seems to have predicted anything much.
A little heads up that Stevens would choose us over Dons is about it.
We already knew about Steele, and no-one tipped the pick swap, Nathan Brown was general knowledge as a possibility
Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those special posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
Last edited by stonecold on Wed 19 Oct 2016 4:48pm, edited 1 time in total.
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!! We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
No.
Have a crack Stonecold...we're 24 hours away...what harm could it do?
What does your source tell You?
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
No.
Have a crack Stonecold...we're 24 hours away...what harm could it do?
What does your source tell You?
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
Jaxons pm'd me and asked me to tell stonecold ... just be patient little grasshopper !!!!!
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
You are a dead set flog who adds nothing to this thread. If the question is just for them, PM them and jog on you self aggrandising muppet.
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
You are a dead set flog who adds nothing to this thread. If the question is just for them, PM them and jog on you self aggrandising muppet.
Your attention seeking is pathetic and sad.
And your not Jaxon or Tony, so that makes you the third component of the question!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!! We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The OtherThommo wrote:Posted this @ E'dope, but one would think GWS would be factoring this in to their list thinking, should it go the wrong way (for them and Whitfield).
"The legal advice means the drugs body is briefed to consider its own independent move on the trio if the AFL does not lay charges.
The AFL has received legal advice and is deciding whether to lay charges of avoiding a performance-enhancing drugs test, which brings a mandatory minimum four-year penalty. The news that ASADA has sought legal advice separate to the AFL indicates it was preparing for the possibility of acting regardless of the AFL."
Lachie Whitfield will think twice before finding another girlfriend - 4 years and maybe all your footy career gone because an ex-girlfriend wanted revenge so dobbed you in.
Maybe she just wanted him off the drugs.
Dobbing him in to ASADA does not get him off the drugs but may get him 4 years, or life, out of football.
That can be counted in millions of dollars lost income.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
The OtherThommo wrote:Posted this @ E'dope, but one would think GWS would be factoring this in to their list thinking, should it go the wrong way (for them and Whitfield).
"The legal advice means the drugs body is briefed to consider its own independent move on the trio if the AFL does not lay charges.
The AFL has received legal advice and is deciding whether to lay charges of avoiding a performance-enhancing drugs test, which brings a mandatory minimum four-year penalty. The news that ASADA has sought legal advice separate to the AFL indicates it was preparing for the possibility of acting regardless of the AFL."
Lachie Whitfield will think twice before finding another girlfriend - 4 years and maybe all your footy career gone because an ex-girlfriend wanted revenge so dobbed you in.
Maybe she just wanted him off the drugs.
Dobbing him in to ASADA does not get him off the drugs but may get him 4 years, or life, out of football.
That can be counted in millions of dollars lost income.
Don't bother.
Stinger is a bit old school when it comes to drug policy. If he had his way there would be public canings.
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those (edited) posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
As someone who has worked in disability before, can I ask that you remove that word from this post?
It says more about you than anyone who you are trying to bait.
(edited by MOD)
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
As someone who has worked in disability before, can I ask that you remove that word from this post?
It says more about you than anyone who you are trying to bait.
There you go, done, by the way, it says nothing about me, so please withdraw your off the mark comment, thanks!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!! We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
As someone who has worked in disability before, can I ask that you remove that word from this post?
It says more about you than anyone who you are trying to bait.
There you go, done, by the way, it says nothing about me, so please withdraw your off the mark comment, thanks!!!!!
Thank you!
My comment was based on someone who thinks, in 2016 it is still acceptable to use that word especially for derogatory purposes, therefore my opinion and statement stands.
Last edited by IluvHarvey on Wed 19 Oct 2016 4:56pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those special posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
No, but yeah, but no, but yeah, but no because something what I don't even know nothing about. So shut up and don't be giving me evils because I'm hanging with my man Ahmet now and we've just been round the back of the waterside, making deals.
fugazi wrote:To be fair, no-one seems to have predicted anything much.
A little heads up that Stevens would choose us over Dons is about it.
We already knew about Steele, and no-one tipped the pick swap, Nathan Brown was general knowledge as a possibility
Correct! And the Stevens info was in all the media outlets when it came on here. ITK are at times a little suss IMHO!
The OtherThommo wrote:Posted this @ E'dope, but one would think GWS would be factoring this in to their list thinking, should it go the wrong way (for them and Whitfield).
"The legal advice means the drugs body is briefed to consider its own independent move on the trio if the AFL does not lay charges.
The AFL has received legal advice and is deciding whether to lay charges of avoiding a performance-enhancing drugs test, which brings a mandatory minimum four-year penalty. The news that ASADA has sought legal advice separate to the AFL indicates it was preparing for the possibility of acting regardless of the AFL."
Lachie Whitfield will think twice before finding another girlfriend - 4 years and maybe all your footy career gone because an ex-girlfriend wanted revenge so dobbed you in.
Maybe she just wanted him off the drugs.
Dobbing him in to ASADA does not get him off the drugs but may get him 4 years, or life, out of football.
That can be counted in millions of dollars lost income.
She went to the club first. Several times. They just brushed her off.
stonecold wrote:Question for Jaxon and Tony, (just for those retarded posters that may think it's for them), are the club about to pull the trigger on the big deal yet?????
You are a dead set flog who adds nothing to this thread. If the question is just for them, PM them and jog on you self aggrandising muppet.
Your attention seeking is pathetic and sad.
And your not Jaxon or Tony, so that makes you the third component of the question!!!!!
The OtherThommo wrote:Posted this @ E'dope, but one would think GWS would be factoring this in to their list thinking, should it go the wrong way (for them and Whitfield).
"The legal advice means the drugs body is briefed to consider its own independent move on the trio if the AFL does not lay charges.
The AFL has received legal advice and is deciding whether to lay charges of avoiding a performance-enhancing drugs test, which brings a mandatory minimum four-year penalty. The news that ASADA has sought legal advice separate to the AFL indicates it was preparing for the possibility of acting regardless of the AFL."
Lachie Whitfield will think twice before finding another girlfriend - 4 years and maybe all your footy career gone because an ex-girlfriend wanted revenge so dobbed you in.
Maybe she just wanted him off the drugs.
Dobbing him in to ASADA does not get him off the drugs but may get him 4 years, or life, out of football.
That can be counted in millions of dollars lost income.
She went to the club first. Several times. They just brushed her off.
In the circumstances, I would have done the same.
Do you believe that she was concerned about his well being at all? Did she contact his family?, did she contact the club doctor? Going to ASADA would never help anything.
If they would show some common sense and stop testing recreational drugs we wouldn't have this issue at all. Poor drug policy is more harmful than no drug policy at all.
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
The OtherThommo wrote:Posted this @ E'dope, but one would think GWS would be factoring this in to their list thinking, should it go the wrong way (for them and Whitfield).
"The legal advice means the drugs body is briefed to consider its own independent move on the trio if the AFL does not lay charges.
The AFL has received legal advice and is deciding whether to lay charges of avoiding a performance-enhancing drugs test, which brings a mandatory minimum four-year penalty. The news that ASADA has sought legal advice separate to the AFL indicates it was preparing for the possibility of acting regardless of the AFL."
Lachie Whitfield will think twice before finding another girlfriend - 4 years and maybe all your footy career gone because an ex-girlfriend wanted revenge so dobbed you in.
Maybe she just wanted him off the drugs.
Dobbing him in to ASADA does not get him off the drugs but may get him 4 years, or life, out of football.
That can be counted in millions of dollars lost income.
Don't bother.
Stinger is a bit old school when it comes to drug policy. If he had his way there would be public canings.
It would seem from your post that this stinger and I would agree where drug pushers were concerned.
I would never advocate public flogging for drug users but I would certainly cut off their welfare benifits.
