Notice the MG at the start of the post? Quoted from MGsaintsRrising wrote:So are you Moorabbin Ghost, or did you just read his BF post or is it a coincidence that you just posted what he posted not long ago?Playon wrote:MG
Another morsel...another club is into one of our players big time. I don't know who yet but was told if we trade it may shock supporters.
Something going on at the club because it's all very secretive the last two weeks.
Jaxons come on down
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Jaxons come on down
Re: Jaxons come on down
Not my morsel it came from MG at BF who is probably their best itk, which makes me a little more than concerned as to who it may be. I dont think we can afford to lose some of our promising playerssantazzi wrote:Thanks for the morsel playon. I had a little mental bite and it ain't tasty. I will pass...Keep our potential stars and go to the draft.......why is it that there is this intense desire to trade?...and the even worse idea that if you do not trade you are a loser...Crazy really...Playon wrote:MG
Another morsel...another club is into one of our players big time. I don't know who yet but was told if we trade it may shock supporters.
Something going on at the club because it's all very secretive the last two weeks.
Billings perhaps???
Re: Jaxons come on down
1. Stevens isn't great.Con Gorozidis wrote:Longer for Stevens and pick 35?
Then we use 46 on Lamb and use 10 and 35 on kids in the draft?
Id be happy with that.
2. Billy Longer went at pick #8 in the draft, we also used pick 25 ourselves on him. I believe many clubs need a ruck, so we should get at least a 2nd round pick.
3. If we get Nathan Brown I'll throw a brick through my window, makes 100% no sense.
4. I'd rather trade pick 10 for maybe a higher end round one pick and a mid round 2 pick, and try get another round 2 pick if we trade Longer, or somehow use him to get Weller
5. Have no idea if Lamb is any good, but seems OK to use a 4th or 5th rounder.
- prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Nathan Brown will be a Free Agent and it makes a lot of sense, we need another ready to go key defender and we can get him for zip.lefty wrote:1. Stevens isn't great.Con Gorozidis wrote:Longer for Stevens and pick 35?
Then we use 46 on Lamb and use 10 and 35 on kids in the draft?
Id be happy with that.
2. Billy Longer went at pick #8 in the draft, we also used pick 25 ourselves on him. I believe many clubs need a ruck, so we should get at least a 2nd round pick.
3. If we get Nathan Brown I'll throw a brick through my window, makes 100% no sense.
4. I'd rather trade pick 10 for maybe a higher end round one pick and a mid round 2 pick, and try get another round 2 pick if we trade Longer, or somehow use him to get Weller
5. Have no idea if Lamb is any good, but seems OK to use a 4th or 5th rounder.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
The best trade post so far.prwilkinson wrote:I wonder what my 1000th post will be about.... 5 to go...
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8395
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Your 1966th post is more important - make it count!Wayne42 wrote:The best trade post so far.prwilkinson wrote:I wonder what my 1000th post will be about.... 5 to go...
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Thanks, I do now. I just did not realise it was a quote.Playon wrote:Notice the MG at the start of the post? Quoted from MGsaintsRrising wrote:So are you Moorabbin Ghost, or did you just read his BF post or is it a coincidence that you just posted what he posted not long ago?Playon wrote:MG
Another morsel...another club is into one of our players big time. I don't know who yet but was told if we trade it may shock supporters.
Something going on at the club because it's all very secretive the last two weeks.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
1 and 2. I was thinking Longer is worth a pick 25 and Stevens a pick 50 something. Thats how I came up with Stevens + pick 35 being about the mark... PIck 25 is early 2nd round.... So I think we agree?lefty wrote:1. Stevens isn't great.Con Gorozidis wrote:Longer for Stevens and pick 35?
Then we use 46 on Lamb and use 10 and 35 on kids in the draft?
Id be happy with that.
2. Billy Longer went at pick #8 in the draft, we also used pick 25 ourselves on him. I believe many clubs need a ruck, so we should get at least a 2nd round pick.
3. If we get Nathan Brown I'll throw a brick through my window, makes 100% no sense.
4. I'd rather trade pick 10 for maybe a higher end round one pick and a mid round 2 pick, and try get another round 2 pick if we trade Longer, or somehow use him to get Weller
5. Have no idea if Lamb is any good, but seems OK to use a 4th or 5th rounder.
3. I agree - Brown = Delaney imo. Dont see much point delisting Delaney and then getting Brown? Same same.
4. Good in theory but seems speculative...
5. Agree.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
I do not think so as the Port rumour is that Lobbe wants to leave as Ryder will be used as the No1 ruck in 2017 after having served his drug ban.MC Gusto wrote:Rumoured port to lose a ruckman. Longer to port?
If Longer goes anywhere it will be to a club where he is likely to be able to grab the No1 ruck slot.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Re: Jaxons come on down
Jacobs
Martin
Kruzer
Grundy
Luenberger
Sandilands
Z Smith
Mumford
McEvoy
Goldstein
Gawn
Ryder
Hampson
Hickey
Naismith
Lycett
Roughead
Which one/s would Longer displace?
Martin
Kruzer
Grundy
Luenberger
Sandilands
Z Smith
Mumford
McEvoy
Goldstein
Gawn
Ryder
Hampson
Hickey
Naismith
Lycett
Roughead
Which one/s would Longer displace?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Jaxons come on down
Ed wants more land.
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Bunk Moreland?satchmo wrote:Ed wants more land.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Jaxons come on down
Hopefully. Is Bunk single?kosifantutti wrote:Bunk Moreland?satchmo wrote:Ed wants more land.
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Based on Longer's 2015 form....BigMart wrote: Which one/s would Longer displace?
Jacobs No
Martin Yes
Kruzer Yes
Grundy Yes
Luenberger No
Sandilands No
Z Smith Yes
Mumford No
McEvoy No
Goldstein No
Gawn No
Ryder Yes
Hampson Yes
Hickey No
Naismith Yes
Lycett Yes (injured)
Roughead Yes
Apparently Will Minson to Port is a done deal, so I'm not sure that's the destination.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9154
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
So will they give us Fyfe in return?Playon wrote:Not my morsel it came from MG at BF who is probably their best itk, which makes me a little more than concerned as to who it may be. I dont think we can afford to lose some of our promising playerssantazzi wrote:Thanks for the morsel playon. I had a little mental bite and it ain't tasty. I will pass...Keep our potential stars and go to the draft.......why is it that there is this intense desire to trade?...and the even worse idea that if you do not trade you are a loser...Crazy really...Playon wrote:MG
Another morsel...another club is into one of our players big time. I don't know who yet but was told if we trade it may shock supporters.
Something going on at the club because it's all very secretive the last two weeks.
Billings perhaps???
Re: Jaxons come on down
Longer wouldn't be a shock after all the talk about him. Armo would have to be a smokey. I could imagine GC eyeing him off as the sort of club leader and standard setter they are desperate for and also to take the heat off Ablett. From Saints perspective if we landed Steele - my understanding is he's a bit more of the same type as Armo, Dunstan and Ross - tough but not particularly quick or elite disposal. Do we want all 4 as out and out midfielders? Even allowing for rotations that's a lot of the same type.Playon wrote:Not my morsel it came from MG at BF who is probably their best itk, which makes me a little more than concerned as to who it may be. I dont think we can afford to lose some of our promising playerssantazzi wrote:Thanks for the morsel playon. I had a little mental bite and it ain't tasty. I will pass...Keep our potential stars and go to the draft.......why is it that there is this intense desire to trade?...and the even worse idea that if you do not trade you are a loser...Crazy really...Playon wrote:MG
Another morsel...another club is into one of our players big time. I don't know who yet but was told if we trade it may shock supporters.
Something going on at the club because it's all very secretive the last two weeks.
Billings perhaps???
Its hard to see Armo moving but if GC throw huge money at him, at 28 that could set him up for life after footy and be hard to resist.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Thu 22 Apr 2004 5:35am
- Location: Done with MN. Happily retired in Vic.
- Has thanked: 1309 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
I agree Bluthy. If he is happy to go, we could get a pretty good deal for him. And there would be no hard feelings in the playing group. And I think it has makes a bit of sense too. Love the Armo but there is a bit of win/win about this possibility.Bluthy wrote:Longer wouldn't be a shock after all the talk about him. Armo would have to be a smokey. I could imagine GC eyeing him off as the sort of club leader and standard setter they are desperate for and also to take the heat off Ablett. From Saints perspective if we landed Steele - my understanding is he's a bit more of the same type as Armo, Dunstan and Ross - tough but not particularly quick or elite disposal. Do we want all 4 as out and out midfielders? Even allowing for rotations that's a lot of the same type.Playon wrote:Not my morsel it came from MG at BF who is probably their best itk, which makes me a little more than concerned as to who it may be. I dont think we can afford to lose some of our promising playerssantazzi wrote:Thanks for the morsel playon. I had a little mental bite and it ain't tasty. I will pass...Keep our potential stars and go to the draft.......why is it that there is this intense desire to trade?...and the even worse idea that if you do not trade you are a loser...Crazy really...Playon wrote:MG
Another morsel...another club is into one of our players big time. I don't know who yet but was told if we trade it may shock supporters.
Something going on at the club because it's all very secretive the last two weeks.
Billings perhaps???
Its hard to see Armo moving but if GC throw huge money at him, at 28 that could set him up for life after footy and be hard to resist.
Nothing better than a good Dad Joke.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Tom Lamb if not then Tom Yum.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Jaxons come on down
If not Tom Yum then we could international rookie list that fine Thai prospect, Kreme of Sum Yung Guy.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Re: Jaxons come on down
StChris
If you think Billy Longer would replace Stefan Martin as a ruckman... Wow
Billy 2015
8 disposals
29 hit outs
Stef Martin 2015
22 disposals
27 hit outs
Not sure he's in front of Paddy Ryder or Matty Kruzer either?
If you think Billy Longer would replace Stefan Martin as a ruckman... Wow
Billy 2015
8 disposals
29 hit outs
Stef Martin 2015
22 disposals
27 hit outs
Not sure he's in front of Paddy Ryder or Matty Kruzer either?
- carn_sainter
- Club Player
- Posts: 1470
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:49pm
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Classic!White Winmar wrote:If not Tom Yum then we could international rookie list that fine Thai prospect, Kreme of Sum Yung Guy.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Jaxons come on down
Huge play is on. Close to being done. Im calling it. My source was holding out the SOB.
Want jaxons or any other itk but take it to the bank (most likely)
Longer Billings and Eli are gone.
BUT before crying foul, its all worth it.
L.WELLER and FYFE.
Apparently Fyfe wants Melbourne. Bigger profile and believes in richo and where were going plus the $1m+ wed be paying.
And this is not a simple fremantle trade. Talking 4 way deal here.
2018 flag is ours. (If reiwoldt stays lol)
Personally happy but sad about billings. Still need to give to get.
Want jaxons or any other itk but take it to the bank (most likely)
Longer Billings and Eli are gone.
BUT before crying foul, its all worth it.
L.WELLER and FYFE.
Apparently Fyfe wants Melbourne. Bigger profile and believes in richo and where were going plus the $1m+ wed be paying.
And this is not a simple fremantle trade. Talking 4 way deal here.
2018 flag is ours. (If reiwoldt stays lol)
Personally happy but sad about billings. Still need to give to get.
- The Recruit
- Club Player
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 118 times