The reformation of the Saintsational Council

[happy feet]

Count me in please!

[saint3d]

I'm in!

[saintspremiers]

I'm in.

But it's not a true council without plugger.

Can the committee/council vote him back him for a special temporary reinstatement?

[mr six o'clock]

I would like to be in


And if a successful candidate could i be
Sir speakscrapalot ?

[desertsaint]

curious, so in cheers.

[Scollop]

In

[skeptic]

I would like to be in


And if a successful candidate could i be
Sir speakscrapalot ?

And so it shall be

[skeptic]

I am seeking forumites to be part of what will one day be considered a mythical dynasty. Be a Knight of the Saintsational Council..

Well I'm not usually one for these silly flights of fancy But ok count me in

Look I'm not one for hyperbole, but consider this like a Moses and the stone pellets moment about to happen

[freely]

No damsels? The Lady of Freelotte's interest has been piqued!

[noddy04]

Include me please

[White Winmar]

No damsels? The Lady of Freelotte's interest has been piqued!

Loris an early nomination for queen!

[Bernard Shakey]

Yep

[The Fireman]

ok..i wanna see what you're upto.

Ecstatic to have u on board Firey...
Nothing in the survey about Sam Gilbert so no controversy there

NO SAM ????????

[asiu]

someone requested 'sisterly' participation !!
so
if 35 Knights of the Square Screen decide that bypassing Cuz
(our God Given free kick at a couple of flags)
was in some barely conceivable left of loopysville off planet way the correct move by and for our footy club

does that then suggest that Consenus Reality expects Mart 'n i to change our mind
or Mart 'n i need to change our mind or Its a settled 'issue' in the context of SS history
'n needs no revisiting im future discussions
and or we were/are wrong or are u as a Collective ,
anti Tasmanians.

lol
what good can come of this madness ?

[skeptic]

ok..i wanna see what you're upto.

Ecstatic to have u on board Firey...
Nothing in the survey about Sam Gilbert so no controversy there

NO SAM ????????

Well i've been trying to go for more universal controversies rather than personal opinions...
For example, i was very much of the view that guys like Jones, Schnieder, Gwilt, Ray and Gilbert all could have been moved on after 2011 with more of an effort to keep the BJ/Dal Santo etc...
Now no doubt that would be a controversial view but it's only really a me thing... And a vastly unpopular and almost universally detested one at that

Whilst I personally don't rate Gilbo as highly as some and perhaps the same could be said of a few other forumites, most seem to be happy with his use/performance and that's fair enough.

Did you have a particular Gilbo related controversy to add to the questionnaire..?

Also, you could be teasing me.

[skeptic]

someone requested 'sisterly' participation !!
so
if 35 Knights of the Square Screen decide that bypassing Cuz
(our God Given free kick at a couple of flags)
was in some barely conceivable left of loopysville off planet way the correct move by and for our footy club

does that then suggest that Consenus Reality expects Mart 'n i to change our mind
or Mart 'n i need to change our mind or Its a settled 'issue' in the context of SS history
'n needs no revisiting im future discussions
and or we were/are wrong or are u as a Collective ,
anti Tasmanians.

lol
what good can come of this madness ?

To put it simply... If Mart or anyone was to disagree with a particular answer/decision... They would forever be labelled as both wrong and as a heretic. It is universally known.

Shall i count you in Wind Sister?

[desertsaint]

someone requested 'sisterly' participation !!
so
if 35 Knights of the Square Screen decide that bypassing Cuz
(our God Given free kick at a couple of flags)
was in some barely conceivable left of loopysville off planet way the correct move by and for our footy club

does that then suggest that Consenus Reality expects Mart 'n i to change our mind
or Mart 'n i need to change our mind or Its a settled 'issue' in the context of SS history
'n needs no revisiting im future discussions
and or we were/are wrong or are u as a Collective ,
anti Tasmanians.

lol
what good can come of this madness ?

history is written by those that write the history books?!

[The Fireman]

ok..i wanna see what you're upto.

Ecstatic to have u on board Firey...
Nothing in the survey about Sam Gilbert so no controversy there

NO SAM ????????

Well i've been trying to go for more universal controversies rather than personal opinions...
For example, i was very much of the view that guys like Jones, Schnieder, Gwilt, Ray and Gilbert all could have been moved on after 2011 with more of an effort to keep the BJ/Dal Santo etc...
Now no doubt that would be a controversial view but it's only really a me thing... And a vastly unpopular and almost universally detested one at that

Whilst I personally don't rate Gilbo as highly as some and perhaps the same could be said of a few other forumites, most seem to be happy with his use/performance and that's fair enough.

Did you have a particular Gilbo related controversy to add to the questionnaire..?

Also, you could be teasing me.

I probably don't post enough for other forumites to fully understand my modus operandi...teasing is one of my weaknesses My thing with Gilbo stems from other posters berating him at every oppurtunity without just cause or at least undervaluing his worth, Gears was another initially . Other than that I have no particular love for Gilbo , he is a plodder but worthy of selection given our player pool. Anyways look forward to your questionnaire.

[The Fireman]

someone requested 'sisterly' participation !!
so
if 35 Knights of the Square Screen decide that bypassing Cuz
(our God Given free kick at a couple of flags)
was in some barely conceivable left of loopysville off planet way the correct move by and for our footy club

does that then suggest that Consenus Reality expects Mart 'n i to change our mind
or Mart 'n i need to change our mind or Its a settled 'issue' in the context of SS history
'n needs no revisiting im future discussions
and or we were/are wrong or are u as a Collective ,
anti Tasmanians.

lol
what good can come of this madness ?

history is written by those that write the history books?!

and time flys like an arrow but fruit flys like a banana.

[saintsRrising]

+ 1 and on my way to being the heretic

[DownAtTheJunction]

Intrigued

[Enrico_Misso]

Curious

[Bluthy]

someone requested 'sisterly' participation !!
so
if 35 Knights of the Square Screen decide that bypassing Cuz
(our God Given free kick at a couple of flags)
was in some barely conceivable left of loopysville off planet way the correct move by and for our footy club

does that then suggest that Consenus Reality expects Mart 'n i to change our mind
or Mart 'n i need to change our mind or Its a settled 'issue' in the context of SS history
'n needs no revisiting im future discussions
and or we were/are wrong or are u as a Collective ,
anti Tasmanians.

lol
what good can come of this madness ?

You must be great at parties

WS: "Why is society demanding we tie ourselves up in knots just to appease some strange consensus reality of what is social entertainment. "

"Er Windsister its just a game of twister"

WS: "Count me out from you attempt at being controlled by a random spinning arrow of fate ...I control my own life as self-activated person"

[asiu]

who cares , beside u , what u do ?

on the other matter ,
u control jacksh1t
exactly like the rest of us.

one day , god willing , u'll wake up to reality , as it Is.

yesterdays contribution was 'participation' focussed Only.
... goin with the flow man !

todays , likewise.



so ,
thanks for the opportunity crazy person.

[8bloggs]

Yep.