I hear it a lot that Richo and the match committee are overly conservative in their approach. That may be so in some cases, but there is a degree of left field thinking as well.CQ SAINT wrote:We dont care what these guys say.To the top wrote:Walker, Boyd, Cameron, Lynch, Franklin, Patton, Hawkins, Kennedy, Hogan et al say Carlisle will not be rucking at any time.
We are focused on a game plan which coordinates relentless commitment to team balance and individual accountability.
4 ruckmen in the squad.
1 ruckman playing most of year with 88% game time and smashing it.
Bruce covering approximately 12 minutes per game in the ruck.
Gilbert Roberton and Dempster regularly taking on KPF's and doing well.
198cm Carlisle coming in 2017.
196 Goddard waiting in the wings.
More Roberton/Dempster/Gilbert types developing at Sandy.
Interest in a few other KPD's
It doesnt take much sense to work out what's going on.
But no lets react to what other teams have in place.
Havent you had enough of doing that?
For instance we'd played Membrey, Bruce and McCartin in the same forward line several times for good result. Many would have said, too tall, doesn't bring enough forward pressure etc.
Carlisle as second ruck could be another example. I mean isn't the second ruck supposed to rest in the forward pocket? Not necessarily apparently.
I applaud this and also the fact that our game plan is far from conservative. You hear a lot about our defensive pressure (which is key, of course) but not so much about what we do when we have the ball.
A Carlton friend of mine remarked this week that we were way too quick for them. I'm not sure that it's leg speed. It's more the speed with which we move the ball and our willingness to take risks that is troubling a lot of opponents.
That's not conservative, it's daring.
Plaudits to the club as a whole. Good times ahead, though perhaps not Saturday night. We'll see.