Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631164Post White Winmar »

What a disappointing turnout. 33,000. A home game and a chance to make some serious cash instead of having to pay our landlords for the privilege of playing. A game between a top side and premiership contender fighting for the double chance and a home final. The most exciting emerging side in the competition, trying to write its own fairytale with an unlikely finals berth. Both teams in red hot form. The saints had gone 8-3 in the previous eleven games, making them one of the form teams of the competition. McCartin, Bruce, Membrey, Steven, Gresham, Acres and Billings. All worth the price of admission. Our very exciting future on display.

A world first social initiative, inviting LGBTI people into the fold in a professional sporting event. It had attracted world wide attention. A week long media marketing blitz. No shortage of stories about the social significance of the game. The Winmars, Jason Ball, Sam Gilbert, and club officials were given plenty of air time. The build up was worthy of a final. The first half delivered some of the best football seen all year. It lived up to the hype. I'd rather forget the second half, but I digress.

I was expecting a crowd of 40,000 plus, not an unreasonable expectation, given what was at stake and the significance of the event. When I got there just before the first bounce, I was disappointed to see gaps in the crowd, especially on our wing on level one and on level two in general. I thought there may have been the usual entry crush fiasco that plagues Etihad (never seems to happen at the MCG), but no, by quarter time it was obvious that we just didn't turn up in any great numbers. Even Carlscum supporters turned up earlier this year for a largely meaningless game. 48,000, with the place packed to the rafters. Again, the vast majority at that game were scum supporters. Says a lot, doesn`t it?

What will it take to get us to games en masse? I haven't been able to get to many games this year because of work and travel commitments, but when I have, we've not even managed a "break even" crowd of 30,000. Why? We're exciting to watch, we've won plenty of games, especially at Etihad and we have 38,000 members. At times it has felt that we're outnumbered by the opposition, even by the dogs and north. What happened to the "cauldron" and fortress that Etihad was for us in the past? Which brings me to my last point. I sincerely hope our membership numbers are up next year. With the promise we have shown and the club in good hands, our form this year augurs well for the future. Even the dogs and north have 40,000 + members. We are trailing the field of Melbourne based clubs. Simply not good enough. We have the bayside and according to surveys, more than half a million supporters nation wide. Surely we could realistically convert those numbers into 50,000 members? 10% is realistic and entirely possible.

So next time we're in a match of the round type situation, I'd love to see us come out of the woodwork like Richmond, Carlscum and doper supporters do when they show the slightest signs of improvement. I know they are all bandwagon jumpers, but sometimes I wish we were too. Come on Sainters, let's show the rest of the comp and turn out en masse for the Lions game. We're almost certain to win and we can celebrate what, overall, has been a great year that has exceeded expectations. Let's start the 50,000 saints on the march campaign!

PS. Matthew Nicholls is an incompetent, egotistical, vengeful little c*nt! Surely the rest of his year should be spent in the bush and suburbs. As GT would've noted, Nicholls should've left his ego in his locker. I'm not an umpire basher, but his performance was just plainly embarrassing.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631168Post mullet »

WW I think the train system is really having an effect. No trains between Caulfield and Moorabbin on the frankston line and I believe the Pakenham line was also effected.

Just imagine trying to get home and getting off trains on to buses etc, you wouldnt get home til 1am if you live in frankston.

I also think a lot of families steer clear of the city on a Saturday night as it can be a bit unruly.


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631172Post White Winmar »

Good points, Mullet, but I think our crowds have been generally disappointing this year. Last nigh of all nights, I would've thought we could've borrowed a line from the dopers, "whatever it takes". Nothing seems to have stopped our opposition's supporters from outnumbering us most weeks this year. It will be interesting to see how the crowds are next year, when we're expected to do well and the PT woes are no longer a factor.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
User avatar
BackFromUSA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631174Post BackFromUSA »

I was shocked at the amount of regulars who were not there last night.

4 whole groups (families) - two that sit in front of us and two either side of us - all empty seats.

That has never happened before.

Lots of empty seats in front of us too that are normally filled.


AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)

"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631191Post bigcarl »

Disappointing crowd, yes. It could have been really something before a full house when they dimmed the lights.

But really, what can you expect? The AFL has decided it's a TV game and you needn't leave your loungue chair to see every game.


Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631195Post Trev from the Bush »

Been the same all year. Some of the excuses for non-attendance take me back to my primary school days. The most memorable note was scrawled in coloured pencil on a brown paper bag containing a kids lunch. "WET DAY"; simply put and effective. Doesn't pass muster or Saints supporters though. I was on duty for work but the rest of my crew went.


Saint supporter since '62
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631196Post kosifantutti »

BackFromUSA wrote:I was shocked at the amount of regulars who were not there last night.

4 whole groups (families) - two that sit in front of us and two either side of us - all empty seats.

That has never happened before.

Lots of empty seats in front of us too that are normally filled.
Do you think they were put off by the Pride game or other factors?

On a positive note I bumped into someone I hadn't seen since I worked in Switzerland four years ago. He had a mild interest in footy at the time and was a dogs supporter. But there he was last night queuing for a Saints blanket, with his partner. And on Facebook it seems he was actually part of a group of eight non footy goers.
At the footy.... Yes the footy. Inaugural Pride match.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
aaron82
Club Player
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:03pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631230Post aaron82 »

I was trying to work out why are attendances are so low. I've been going for nearly 30 years and have attended most games this season. The trains are absolutely a reason especially when it's live on channel 7.

Last night was the first time I've thought why bother. Our players and club in general are working their backsides off and this is no reflection on them. Love our group of players. What concerns me is the cost of continually turning up to watch teams with significant advantages in salary cap, academy picks, free agents. It's not a level playing field at all.

The swans will make their 15 from 16 finals series this year. Them and the Giants won't miss very often in the next 20 years and will win flags. The cost of food, getting to a ground that is miles from Bayswater where I live and what is really making it tough the (in my view) worst year of umpiring. Our forwards can be hog tied and still no free. Can you imagine in a GF close game and the 3 50 metre penalties being paid. A lunatic supporter may loose it and Barry Hall an umpire.

Bottom line for me is the AFL is pricing me out of the game to watch a sport that is not even close to a level playing field. I'd rather go to the VFL at times to be honest


and that's the bottom line
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631233Post Bluthy »

The reality is that some supporters won't go if they think we don't have a great chance at winning and we were playing Sydney. As we go up the ladder they crowds will come. YOu can call them band wagoners if you like but its just a reality with all clubs. Success on field = big crowds.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631243Post saintspremiers »

At the members forum at the town hall a month or so ago there seemed a significant amount of negative sentiment towards the pride match.

I strongly believe given the low turnout that there was a bit of a member boycott of the game.

Very f****** sad and embarrassing if true, and the reason we needed the game and it to be an annual event until attitudes change.

To those that boycotted the game, I hope they know how high the suicide rate is amongst the LBGTIQ folk. That's just WRONG and needs to change. Every life is as valuable as the next regardless of orientation. And no, I'm not LBGTIQ.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631254Post Toy Saint »

Bluthy wrote:The reality is that some supporters won't go if they think we don't have a great chance at winning and we were playing Sydney. As we go up the ladder they crowds will come. YOu can call them band wagoners if you like but its just a reality with all clubs. Success on field = big crowds.
This just about sums it up. It's just human nature, fans like to feel like their team can win.

And sadly, the AFL know this. They need the maximum number of fans believing their team can win to be commercially seccessfull. With 65% of Australia's population in NSW and Sth East Queensland, they need there folk to believe their team can win.

So the AFL create all manor of advantages for teams in NSW & Qld. Their teams need to be winners to maximise interest, therefore maximising TV ratings and profits for that AFL and bonuses for it's staff.

Fans of the traditional Melbourne teams have 'built in' generations of club loyalty, and the AFL assume these fans will continue to turn up regardless of the teams lack of success.

But some of the traditional fans are human, they are losing interest. Their kids don't want to turn up to watch their team lose.


sainters4eva
Club Player
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 1:32pm

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631267Post sainters4eva »

aaron82 wrote:I was trying to work out why are attendances are so low. I've been going for nearly 30 years and have attended most games this season. The trains are absolutely a reason especially when it's live on channel 7.

Last night was the first time I've thought why bother. Our players and club in general are working their backsides off and this is no reflection on them. Love our group of players. What concerns me is the cost of continually turning up to watch teams with significant advantages in salary cap, academy picks, free agents. It's not a level playing field at all.

The swans will make their 15 from 16 finals series this year. Them and the Giants won't miss very often in the next 20 years and will win flags. The cost of food, getting to a ground that is miles from Bayswater where I live and what is really making it tough the (in my view) worst year of umpiring. Our forwards can be hog tied and still no free. Can you imagine in a GF close game and the 3 50 metre penalties being paid. A lunatic supporter may loose it and Barry Hall an umpire.

Bottom line for me is the AFL is pricing me out of the game to watch a sport that is not even close to a level playing field. I'd rather go to the VFL at times to be honest
Couldn't agree more aaron


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631268Post Linton Lodger »

BackFromUSA wrote:I was shocked at the amount of regulars who were not there last night.

4 whole groups (families) - two that sit in front of us and two either side of us - all empty seats.

That has never happened before.

Lots of empty seats in front of us too that are normally filled.
Is homophobia a factor?


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2080
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631270Post freely »

Linton Lodger wrote:
BackFromUSA wrote:I was shocked at the amount of regulars who were not there last night.

4 whole groups (families) - two that sit in front of us and two either side of us - all empty seats.

That has never happened before.

Lots of empty seats in front of us too that are normally filled.
Is homophobia a factor?
Maybe for those particular families (can't know) but I doubt it for the attendance overall. I know half a dozen people personally who came to this game that haven't been to the football for years - one in fact who's never been before! But I think the fact you can now stream every game live must have an impact.


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631272Post Linton Lodger »

saintspremiers wrote:At the members forum at the town hall a month or so ago there seemed a significant amount of negative sentiment towards the pride match.

I strongly believe given the low turnout that there was a bit of a member boycott of the game.

Very f****** sad and embarrassing if true, and the reason we needed the game and it to be an annual event until attitudes change.

To those that boycotted the game, I hope they know how high the suicide rate is amongst the LBGTIQ folk. That's just WRONG and needs to change. Every life is as valuable as the next regardless of orientation. And no, I'm not LBGTIQ.
+1

Shameful and petty prejudices. There are far more important things to be concerned about in this day and age, than what people do in their bedrooms. You know, climate change, population density, our relationship with China, the fact that we are not yet ready to deal with a big incoming asteroid and the rise of religious fundamentalism. Yet we have people preoccupied with the sexual orientation of other people. Get serious and wake up.


User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631275Post prwilkinson »

aaron82 wrote:I was trying to work out why are attendances are so low. I've been going for nearly 30 years and have attended most games this season. The trains are absolutely a reason especially when it's live on channel 7.

Last night was the first time I've thought why bother. Our players and club in general are working their backsides off and this is no reflection on them. Love our group of players. What concerns me is the cost of continually turning up to watch teams with significant advantages in salary cap, academy picks, free agents. It's not a level playing field at all.

The swans will make their 15 from 16 finals series this year. Them and the Giants won't miss very often in the next 20 years and will win flags. The cost of food, getting to a ground that is miles from Bayswater where I live and what is really making it tough the (in my view) worst year of umpiring. Our forwards can be hog tied and still no free. Can you imagine in a GF close game and the 3 50 metre penalties being paid. A lunatic supporter may loose it and Barry Hall an umpire.

Bottom line for me is the AFL is pricing me out of the game to watch a sport that is not even close to a level playing field. I'd rather go to the VFL at times to be honest
I think plenty of rusted on footy fans around Melbourne town agree you with mate. We're always thought of last.


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4951
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 497 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631282Post Moods »

Linton Lodger wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:At the members forum at the town hall a month or so ago there seemed a significant amount of negative sentiment towards the pride match.

I strongly believe given the low turnout that there was a bit of a member boycott of the game.

Very f****** sad and embarrassing if true, and the reason we needed the game and it to be an annual event until attitudes change.

To those that boycotted the game, I hope they know how high the suicide rate is amongst the LBGTIQ folk. That's just WRONG and needs to change. Every life is as valuable as the next regardless of orientation. And no, I'm not LBGTIQ.
+1

Shameful and petty prejudices. There are far more important things to be concerned about in this day and age, than what people do in their bedrooms. You know, climate change, population density, our relationship with China, the fact that we are not yet ready to deal with a big incoming asteroid and the rise of religious fundamentalism. Yet we have people preoccupied with the sexual orientation of other people. Get serious and wake up.
I think we're trying to make a mountain out of a molehill here. I cannot imagine ANY supporter of any club caring whether it was a pride game or any other game. The fact is, we pull quite poorly against interstate teams. I actually reckon 33,000 against an interstate team is very good, and ppl expecting 40k plus just because it was the 'Pride' game are kidding themselves. Probably 27-30k in normal instances, and a few extra because of the occasion is about right.

For the record I couldn't make it and I consider myself a regular, but certainly didn't 'boycott' the game.


SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631359Post SemperFidelis »

freely wrote:
Linton Lodger wrote:
BackFromUSA wrote:I was shocked at the amount of regulars who were not there last night.

4 whole groups (families) - two that sit in front of us and two either side of us - all empty seats.

That has never happened before.

Lots of empty seats in front of us too that are normally filled.
Is homophobia a factor?
Maybe for those particular families (can't know) but I doubt it for the attendance overall. I know half a dozen people personally who came to this game that haven't been to the football for years - one in fact who's never been before! But I think the fact you can now stream every game live must have an impact.

Interestingly, around me all the usual families with kids were there. A few of the blokes who come in twos were conspicuously absent.

The most disappointing moment from my point of view was when one of the older ducks behind me (who'd gathered up a poultice of glow bands and flags) tried to give one the the flags to a ring in family who seemed to have upgraded themselves into the seats of some absent regulars. The Dad flat out refused to have his kid hold a small rainbow flag.

Sad.


Always loyal
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631361Post saynta »

BackFromUSA wrote:I was shocked at the amount of regulars who were not there last night.

4 whole groups (families) - two that sit in front of us and two either side of us - all empty seats.

That has never happened before.

Lots of empty seats in front of us too that are normally filled.
Well, maybe some families don't think the footy is the appropriate forum to be promoting some social issues.

I don't have a problem with yesterday's theme , but overall I think footy's for footy. Let others worry about social issues.


User avatar
carn_sainter
Club Player
Posts: 1470
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:49pm
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631364Post carn_sainter »

aaron82 wrote:I was trying to work out why are attendances are so low. I've been going for nearly 30 years and have attended most games this season. The trains are absolutely a reason especially when it's live on channel 7.

Last night was the first time I've thought why bother. Our players and club in general are working their backsides off and this is no reflection on them. Love our group of players. What concerns me is the cost of continually turning up to watch teams with significant advantages in salary cap, academy picks, free agents. It's not a level playing field at all.

The swans will make their 15 from 16 finals series this year. Them and the Giants won't miss very often in the next 20 years and will win flags. The cost of food, getting to a ground that is miles from Bayswater where I live and what is really making it tough the (in my view) worst year of umpiring. Our forwards can be hog tied and still no free. Can you imagine in a GF close game and the 3 50 metre penalties being paid. A lunatic supporter may loose it and Barry Hall an umpire.

Bottom line for me is the AFL is pricing me out of the game to watch a sport that is not even close to a level playing field. I'd rather go to the VFL at times to be honest
It's pretty easy for me to get to games and I really like watching the saints too.

But I agree completely about the umpiring! I have no desire to consume afl footy outside of saints games and even then, I sometimes think it's not worth it to go and support the afl competition. I've attended all of our Melbourne games this year but a little reluctantly.

And the umpiring is a massive part of it. Massive. More than just the umpiring, the rules themselves...how rules can change from one week to the next or be 'enforced' for two weeks and then forgotten about? It just drives me nuts.

I honestly thought about throwing in the towel when Waite got that free in the goalsquare against Hickey a couple of weeks ago.

It's just crap.

The other thing that is making me want to give it away is the AFL selling itself to Crownbet and every other gambling company out there, getting 13 and 14 year old kids hooked on the fun of gambling and facilitating all of the awful consequences where gambling is normal...especially with all of the blokey language they use as if it is a rite of passage for a man.

Honestly, as an organisation I reckon they ought to be ashamed.


mcadam05
Club Player
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 1:47pm
Location: Kew
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631377Post mcadam05 »

The game the night before only got 35000 , I just think people are tried of how the game's played


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631378Post saynta »

carn_sainter wrote:
aaron82 wrote:I was trying to work out why are attendances are so low. I've been going for nearly 30 years and have attended most games this season. The trains are absolutely a reason especially when it's live on channel 7.

Last night was the first time I've thought why bother. Our players and club in general are working their backsides off and this is no reflection on them. Love our group of players. What concerns me is the cost of continually turning up to watch teams with significant advantages in salary cap, academy picks, free agents. It's not a level playing field at all.

The swans will make their 15 from 16 finals series this year. Them and the Giants won't miss very often in the next 20 years and will win flags. The cost of food, getting to a ground that is miles from Bayswater where I live and what is really making it tough the (in my view) worst year of umpiring. Our forwards can be hog tied and still no free. Can you imagine in a GF close game and the 3 50 metre penalties being paid. A lunatic supporter may loose it and Barry Hall an umpire.

Bottom line for me is the AFL is pricing me out of the game to watch a sport that is not even close to a level playing field. I'd rather go to the VFL at times to be honest
It's pretty easy for me to get to games and I really like watching the saints too.

But I agree completely about the umpiring! I have no desire to consume afl footy outside of saints games and even then, I sometimes think it's not worth it to go and support the afl competition. I've attended all of our Melbourne games this year but a little reluctantly.

And the umpiring is a massive part of it. Massive. More than just the umpiring, the rules themselves...how rules can change from one week to the next or be 'enforced' for two weeks and then forgotten about? It just drives me nuts.

I honestly thought about throwing in the towel when Waite got that free in the goalsquare against Hickey a couple of weeks ago.

It's just crap.

The other thing that is making me want to give it away is the AFL selling itself to Crownbet and every other gambling company out there, getting 13 and 14 year old kids hooked on the fun of gambling and facilitating all of the awful consequences where gambling is normal...especially with all of the blokey language they use as if it is a rite of passage for a man.

Honestly, as an organisation I reckon they ought to be ashamed.


Feel the same about the gambling.

It's got to the stage now when the betting is resuling in NRL games being rigged or thrown.

Only a matter of time before someone is caught doing the same in the AFL.

To my mind the maggots should already be under suspicion.


I couldn't believe it when ads came on promoting betting on the olympic games ffs.


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631450Post Griggsy »

On screen it sounded like a fair few swan supporters rocked up too given how audible the cheers for Aliir Aliir were whenever he touched the ball.

Slightly off topic, what were the cheers for him for? Played a solid game but don't think it was cheer every time kind of good.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631452Post loris »

saynta wrote:
carn_sainter wrote:
aaron82 wrote:I was trying to work out why are attendances are so low. I've been going for nearly 30 years and have attended most games this season. The trains are absolutely a reason especially when it's live on channel 7.

Last night was the first time I've thought why bother. Our players and club in general are working their backsides off and this is no reflection on them. Love our group of players. What concerns me is the cost of continually turning up to watch teams with significant advantages in salary cap, academy picks, free agents. It's not a level playing field at all.

The swans will make their 15 from 16 finals series this year. Them and the Giants won't miss very often in the next 20 years and will win flags. The cost of food, getting to a ground that is miles from Bayswater where I live and what is really making it tough the (in my view) worst year of umpiring. Our forwards can be hog tied and still no free. Can you imagine in a GF close game and the 3 50 metre penalties being paid. A lunatic supporter may loose it and Barry Hall an umpire.

Bottom line for me is the AFL is pricing me out of the game to watch a sport that is not even close to a level playing field. I'd rather go to the VFL at times to be honest
It's pretty easy for me to get to games and I really like watching the saints too.

But I agree completely about the umpiring! I have no desire to consume afl footy outside of saints games and even then, I sometimes think it's not worth it to go and support the afl competition. I've attended all of our Melbourne games this year but a little reluctantly.

And the umpiring is a massive part of it. Massive. More than just the umpiring, the rules themselves...how rules can change from one week to the next or be 'enforced' for two weeks and then forgotten about? It just drives me nuts.

I honestly thought about throwing in the towel when Waite got that free in the goalsquare against Hickey a couple of weeks ago.

It's just crap.

The other thing that is making me want to give it away is the AFL selling itself to Crownbet and every other gambling company out there, getting 13 and 14 year old kids hooked on the fun of gambling and facilitating all of the awful consequences where gambling is normal...especially with all of the blokey language they use as if it is a rite of passage for a man.

Honestly, as an organisation I reckon they ought to be ashamed.


Feel the same about the gambling.

It's got to the stage now when the betting is resuling in NRL games being rigged or thrown.

Only a matter of time before someone is caught doing the same in the AFL.

To my mind the maggots should already be under suspicion.


I couldn't believe it when ads came on promoting betting on the olympic games ffs.
Agree about the concerns over the nauseous promotion of gambling.


SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Where were we, Sainters? Disappointing crowd.

Post: # 1631456Post SemperFidelis »

Griggsy wrote:On screen it sounded like a fair few swan supporters rocked up too given how audible the cheers for Aliir Aliir were whenever he touched the ball.

Slightly off topic, what were the cheers for him for? Played a solid game but don't think it was cheer every time kind of good.
Cult figure, pure and simple. They've absolutely embraced him.

And given the raw material, that's understandable!


Always loyal
Post Reply