Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Curious what others think. For mine Bruce is a fwd and nothing else. He goes into the ruck to give Hickey a chop out by virtue of his heigt and nothing else. I watch him in the ruck every week and he gets slaughtered, monstered in fact. I actually feel sorry for him. All our mids can do is rove to the opposition - particularly at centre bounces. Can he be converted into some sort of ruckman, or do we have to just make do? What other options do we have? The top teams appear to have a genuine back up ruckman, Hawks have 2, Sydney have 2 once Tippett is back, GWS have 2. THoughts?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri 23 May 2014 11:32pm
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
I'd imagine that if we were to get a Merchbank/Hurley/another KPD that Carlisle would replace Bruce in that role
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1993 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Problem is this. If we play McCartin, Bruce and Members up forward, which I like, how do you fit in a second ruck?
Also aware of the need to give Hickey a chop out from time to time. We don't want to leave too much to too few in any position. Next year hopefully Carlisle can fill the void with occasional help from Bruce.
Also aware of the need to give Hickey a chop out from time to time. We don't want to leave too much to too few in any position. Next year hopefully Carlisle can fill the void with occasional help from Bruce.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
How tall is Goddard?Saintberra wrote:I'd imagine that if we were to get a Merchbank/Hurley/another KPD that Carlisle would replace Bruce in that role
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 793 times
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
I think it's a really good question. Our forward line is so big with Paddy and Bruce that playing a second ruckman like Pierce or Longer would be tough. Would be good if Pierce could come on as a bit of a utility, play back / forward in between stints in the ruck, and put Hickey forward or for a rest on the bench. I don't believe Bruce is a good option in the ruck, but he's probably the best / only option for us with our current team composition.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1993 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Good point. He's 196cm and maybe still growing.The_President wrote:How tall is Goddard?Saintberra wrote:I'd imagine that if we were to get a Merchbank/Hurley/another KPD that Carlisle would replace Bruce in that role
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Carlisle will 2nd ruck and push back. The mids will play shut down and Hickey will rest on the bench. Roberton Gilbert and Dempster will cover the key defensive roles while Carlisle rucks. Lewis Jason and Billy are only there for injury insurance.Moods wrote:Curious what others think. For mine Bruce is a fwd and nothing else. He goes into the ruck to give Hickey a chop out by virtue of his heigt and nothing else. I watch him in the ruck every week and he gets slaughtered, monstered in fact. I actually feel sorry for him. All our mids can do is rove to the opposition - particularly at centre bounces. Can he be converted into some sort of ruckman, or do we have to just make do? What other options do we have? The top teams appear to have a genuine back up ruckman, Hawks have 2, Sydney have 2 once Tippett is back, GWS have 2. THoughts?
Hickey is a gun and Carlisle is a solid back up.
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
He's a hopeless ruckman. But I don't want to play two genuine ruckman either (unless the other one can actually play the game like Hickey can). Would be good if whoever fills in the second ruck role could occasionally break even...
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23157
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9106 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
You don't use a champion racehourse to pull a milkcart.Legendary wrote:Carlisle is a handy ruckman.
I'm also surprised they haven't thrown Paddy in there.
We do lose something when Hickey isn't at the bounce.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Paddy too small for mine - he's smaller than Bruce. I tend to agree with Saynta, keep our young stars away from the ruck. We would never throw Roo in there. I wasn't aware that Varlisle could ruck. I know he's a big lug of a bloke, but I didn't think he was a ruckman. Funny to think that 10yrs ago 2 x rucks were played, both off the interchange and they rotated on and off.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
[quote="Moods"]Paddy too small for mine - he's smaller than Bruce. I tend to agree with Saynta, keep our young stars away from the ruck. We would never throw Roo in there. I wasn't aware that Varlisle could ruck. I know he's a big lug of a bloke, but I didn't think he was a ruckman. Funny to think that 10yrs ago 2 x rucks were played, both off the interchange and they rotated on and off.[/quote)
Carlisle isnt great. He just has to do what Hickey does., that is, he just determines where the ball will land. Whether or jot he wins the ruck.
Carlisle isnt great. He just has to do what Hickey does., that is, he just determines where the ball will land. Whether or jot he wins the ruck.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Agree with your thoughts, Bruce ain't no ruck and we get slaughtered while he if off the groundMoods wrote:Curious what others think. For mine Bruce is a fwd and nothing else. He goes into the ruck to give Hickey a chop out by virtue of his heigt and nothing else. I watch him in the ruck every week and he gets slaughtered, monstered in fact. I actually feel sorry for him. All our mids can do is rove to the opposition - particularly at centre bounces. Can he be converted into some sort of ruckman, or do we have to just make do? What other options do we have? The top teams appear to have a genuine back up ruckman, Hawks have 2, Sydney have 2 once Tippett is back, GWS have 2. THoughts?
. I would think the club may believe Lewis will have the ability to ruck and drop in the forward line.
We could carry two ruckmen as mobile as Hickey and Pierce IMO. I believe that if Stanley was more consistent he would. he is playing that role as he does at Geelong, were just after a more consistent version
Carlise can ruck a bit so that may help us out in the meantime.
There were noises that interchange was going to keep reducing over the comming seasons This may almost force teams to find a second mobile ruck who can rest awhile forward or back depending on the game dynamics.
And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
About as good as Gresham.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
They should try something like this at least once this season/
Fwd..... L. Pierce. Paddy. Membrey
HFwd... Weller. Bruce. Billing
Roo on the wing.
Fwd..... L. Pierce. Paddy. Membrey
HFwd... Weller. Bruce. Billing
Roo on the wing.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
I reckon that line up is too slow and doesn't offer enough defensive pressure.borderbarry wrote:They should try something like this at least once this season/
Fwd..... L. Pierce. Paddy. Membrey
HFwd... Weller. Bruce. Billing
Roo on the wing.
I think the only way another ruckman gets in the team is if 1 of Roo, Bruce or McCartin is out.
I can see when Roo eventually retires that Bruce could move up the ground and play the 'Roo wing role' making a spot for a mobile ruckman on the forward line (Pierce?)
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Where does this presumption that Carlisle will ruck come from?
He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.
So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?
It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.
The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.
Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.
Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.
Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.
No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).
He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.
So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?
It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.
The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.
Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.
Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.
Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.
No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1993 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
I think I read somewhere the plan for this season was to use Carlisle instead of Bruce as second ruck. Then Carlisle and the rest were banned.To the top wrote:Where does this presumption that Carlisle will ruck come from?
He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.
So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?
It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.
The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.
Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.
Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.
Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.
No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Walker, Boyd, Cameron, Lynch, Franklin, Patton, Hawkins, Kennedy, Hogan et al say Carlisle will not be rucking at any time.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
I reckon Bruce usually does enough in the ruck. There was just that one game against the dogs where they went on a roll for 5 minutes while Hickey was off. But as long as he's not getting smashed and he's a threat around the ground I reckon he's a better option than having a second ruck.
When Montagna kicked the winning goal against the Dee's it was Bruce in the middle who then ran forward and got involved again.
When Montagna kicked the winning goal against the Dee's it was Bruce in the middle who then ran forward and got involved again.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Yes you are correct 'bigcarl'. There was a video interview with Josh Bruce on the saints.com.au a couple of months ago. Josh was asked about his role in ruck giving Hickey a chop out. He said the plan was to use Carlisle in that role this season. However due Carlilse's ban they went to plan B......... using Bruce. So the words came out of Bruce's mouth.bigcarl wrote:I think I read somewhere the plan for this season was to use Carlisle instead of Bruce as second ruck. Then Carlisle and the rest were banned.To the top wrote:Where does this presumption that Carlisle will ruck come from?
He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.
So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?
It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.
The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.
Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.
Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.
Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.
No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Just looked up my original post on 31 May re the video Josh Bruce mentioned Carlilse doing the pinch hitting in the ruck this season. It was on a video 'Future Stars' that was relayed on saints.com.au around that time. Someone could do a link to verify where the talk of Carlisle rucking came from - it was obviously sometime around that date the video was done.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1993 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
We dont care what these guys say.To the top wrote:Walker, Boyd, Cameron, Lynch, Franklin, Patton, Hawkins, Kennedy, Hogan et al say Carlisle will not be rucking at any time.
We are focused on a game plan which coordinates relentless commitment to team balance and individual accountability.
4 ruckmen in the squad.
1 ruckman playing most of year with 88% game time and smashing it.
Bruce covering approximately 12 minutes per game in the ruck.
Gilbert Roberton and Dempster regularly taking on KPF's and doing well.
198cm Carlisle coming in 2017.
196 Goddard waiting in the wings.
More Roberton/Dempster/Gilbert types developing at Sandy.
Interest in a few other KPD's
It doesnt take much sense to work out what's going on.
But no lets react to what other teams have in place.
Havent you had enough of doing that?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck
Does anyone else find it amusing that the Dogs pay the same amount for Boyd that we pay for all three of Bruce, Membrey and McCartin.