Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630016Post Moods »

Curious what others think. For mine Bruce is a fwd and nothing else. He goes into the ruck to give Hickey a chop out by virtue of his heigt and nothing else. I watch him in the ruck every week and he gets slaughtered, monstered in fact. I actually feel sorry for him. All our mids can do is rove to the opposition - particularly at centre bounces. Can he be converted into some sort of ruckman, or do we have to just make do? What other options do we have? The top teams appear to have a genuine back up ruckman, Hawks have 2, Sydney have 2 once Tippett is back, GWS have 2. THoughts?


Saintberra
Club Player
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri 23 May 2014 11:32pm

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630019Post Saintberra »

I'd imagine that if we were to get a Merchbank/Hurley/another KPD that Carlisle would replace Bruce in that role


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630021Post bigcarl »

Problem is this. If we play McCartin, Bruce and Members up forward, which I like, how do you fit in a second ruck?

Also aware of the need to give Hickey a chop out from time to time. We don't want to leave too much to too few in any position. Next year hopefully Carlisle can fill the void with occasional help from Bruce.


The_President
Club Player
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630023Post The_President »

Saintberra wrote:I'd imagine that if we were to get a Merchbank/Hurley/another KPD that Carlisle would replace Bruce in that role
How tall is Goddard?


User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 3102
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 793 times
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630026Post shrodes »

I think it's a really good question. Our forward line is so big with Paddy and Bruce that playing a second ruckman like Pierce or Longer would be tough. Would be good if Pierce could come on as a bit of a utility, play back / forward in between stints in the ruck, and put Hickey forward or for a rest on the bench. I don't believe Bruce is a good option in the ruck, but he's probably the best / only option for us with our current team composition.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630027Post bigcarl »

The_President wrote:
Saintberra wrote:I'd imagine that if we were to get a Merchbank/Hurley/another KPD that Carlisle would replace Bruce in that role
How tall is Goddard?
Good point. He's 196cm and maybe still growing.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6091
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630028Post CQ SAINT »

Moods wrote:Curious what others think. For mine Bruce is a fwd and nothing else. He goes into the ruck to give Hickey a chop out by virtue of his heigt and nothing else. I watch him in the ruck every week and he gets slaughtered, monstered in fact. I actually feel sorry for him. All our mids can do is rove to the opposition - particularly at centre bounces. Can he be converted into some sort of ruckman, or do we have to just make do? What other options do we have? The top teams appear to have a genuine back up ruckman, Hawks have 2, Sydney have 2 once Tippett is back, GWS have 2. THoughts?
Carlisle will 2nd ruck and push back. The mids will play shut down and Hickey will rest on the bench. Roberton Gilbert and Dempster will cover the key defensive roles while Carlisle rucks. Lewis Jason and Billy are only there for injury insurance.

Hickey is a gun and Carlisle is a solid back up.


Legendary
Club Player
Posts: 1900
Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630034Post Legendary »

Carlisle is a handy ruckman.

I'm also surprised they haven't thrown Paddy in there.

We do lose something when Hickey isn't at the bounce.


User avatar
Saints43
Club Player
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
Location: L2 A38
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630036Post Saints43 »

He's a hopeless ruckman. But I don't want to play two genuine ruckman either (unless the other one can actually play the game like Hickey can). Would be good if whoever fills in the second ruck role could occasionally break even...


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23162
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9109 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630050Post saynta »

Legendary wrote:Carlisle is a handy ruckman.

I'm also surprised they haven't thrown Paddy in there.

We do lose something when Hickey isn't at the bounce.
You don't use a champion racehourse to pull a milkcart.


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630056Post Moods »

Paddy too small for mine - he's smaller than Bruce. I tend to agree with Saynta, keep our young stars away from the ruck. We would never throw Roo in there. I wasn't aware that Varlisle could ruck. I know he's a big lug of a bloke, but I didn't think he was a ruckman. Funny to think that 10yrs ago 2 x rucks were played, both off the interchange and they rotated on and off.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6091
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630057Post CQ SAINT »

[quote="Moods"]Paddy too small for mine - he's smaller than Bruce. I tend to agree with Saynta, keep our young stars away from the ruck. We would never throw Roo in there. I wasn't aware that Varlisle could ruck. I know he's a big lug of a bloke, but I didn't think he was a ruckman. Funny to think that 10yrs ago 2 x rucks were played, both off the interchange and they rotated on and off.[/quote)

Carlisle isnt great. He just has to do what Hickey does., that is, he just determines where the ball will land. Whether or jot he wins the ruck.


supersaints
Club Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630160Post supersaints »

Moods wrote:Curious what others think. For mine Bruce is a fwd and nothing else. He goes into the ruck to give Hickey a chop out by virtue of his heigt and nothing else. I watch him in the ruck every week and he gets slaughtered, monstered in fact. I actually feel sorry for him. All our mids can do is rove to the opposition - particularly at centre bounces. Can he be converted into some sort of ruckman, or do we have to just make do? What other options do we have? The top teams appear to have a genuine back up ruckman, Hawks have 2, Sydney have 2 once Tippett is back, GWS have 2. THoughts?
Agree with your thoughts, Bruce ain't no ruck and we get slaughtered while he if off the ground
. I would think the club may believe Lewis will have the ability to ruck and drop in the forward line.

We could carry two ruckmen as mobile as Hickey and Pierce IMO. I believe that if Stanley was more consistent he would. he is playing that role as he does at Geelong, were just after a more consistent version
Carlise can ruck a bit so that may help us out in the meantime.
There were noises that interchange was going to keep reducing over the comming seasons This may almost force teams to find a second mobile ruck who can rest awhile forward or back depending on the game dynamics.


And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf" 

Go Sainters !!!!!
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630182Post magnifisaint »

About as good as Gresham.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630197Post borderbarry »

They should try something like this at least once this season/

Fwd..... L. Pierce. Paddy. Membrey
HFwd... Weller. Bruce. Billing


Roo on the wing.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12798
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 811 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630200Post Mr Magic »

borderbarry wrote:They should try something like this at least once this season/

Fwd..... L. Pierce. Paddy. Membrey
HFwd... Weller. Bruce. Billing


Roo on the wing.
I reckon that line up is too slow and doesn't offer enough defensive pressure.
I think the only way another ruckman gets in the team is if 1 of Roo, Bruce or McCartin is out.
I can see when Roo eventually retires that Bruce could move up the ground and play the 'Roo wing role' making a spot for a mobile ruckman on the forward line (Pierce?)


To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630202Post To the top »

Where does this presumption that Carlisle will ruck come from?

He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.

So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?

It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.

The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.

Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.

Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.

Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.

No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630205Post bigcarl »

To the top wrote:Where does this presumption that Carlisle will ruck come from?

He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.

So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?

It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.

The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.

Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.

Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.

Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.

No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).
I think I read somewhere the plan for this season was to use Carlisle instead of Bruce as second ruck. Then Carlisle and the rest were banned.


To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630219Post To the top »

Walker, Boyd, Cameron, Lynch, Franklin, Patton, Hawkins, Kennedy, Hogan et al say Carlisle will not be rucking at any time.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630227Post kosifantutti »

I reckon Bruce usually does enough in the ruck. There was just that one game against the dogs where they went on a roll for 5 minutes while Hickey was off. But as long as he's not getting smashed and he's a threat around the ground I reckon he's a better option than having a second ruck.

When Montagna kicked the winning goal against the Dee's it was Bruce in the middle who then ran forward and got involved again.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630249Post loris »

bigcarl wrote:
To the top wrote:Where does this presumption that Carlisle will ruck come from?

He was recruited as a key defender because we only had Fisher and the novice Goddard.

So, why the hell would you even consider rucking him?

It makes as much sense as rucking Bruce.

The simple facts are that we have 3 ruckmen on our List, with both Longer and Pierce re-signed in recent weeks.

Longer has had a terrible year for a multitude of reasons - but was a high Draft Pick recruited from elsewhere so my expectation is that the rucking duties will resolve to Hickey and Longer.

Pierce is a "learner" and the back up.

Look at the ages of Hickey, Longer and Pierce (and the number of games they have played) because they all have their futures in front of them - so we expect significant improvement with experience.

No doubt Hickey is currently the most agile (and he was by a long shot even when we had McEvoy).
I think I read somewhere the plan for this season was to use Carlisle instead of Bruce as second ruck. Then Carlisle and the rest were banned.
Yes you are correct 'bigcarl'. There was a video interview with Josh Bruce on the saints.com.au a couple of months ago. Josh was asked about his role in ruck giving Hickey a chop out. He said the plan was to use Carlisle in that role this season. However due Carlilse's ban they went to plan B......... using Bruce. So the words came out of Bruce's mouth.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630254Post loris »

Just looked up my original post on 31 May re the video Josh Bruce mentioned Carlilse doing the pinch hitting in the ruck this season. It was on a video 'Future Stars' that was relayed on saints.com.au around that time. Someone could do a link to verify where the talk of Carlisle rucking came from - it was obviously sometime around that date the video was done.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630264Post bigcarl »

Thanks Loris


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6091
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630269Post CQ SAINT »

To the top wrote:Walker, Boyd, Cameron, Lynch, Franklin, Patton, Hawkins, Kennedy, Hogan et al say Carlisle will not be rucking at any time.
We dont care what these guys say.

We are focused on a game plan which coordinates relentless commitment to team balance and individual accountability.

4 ruckmen in the squad.
1 ruckman playing most of year with 88% game time and smashing it.
Bruce covering approximately 12 minutes per game in the ruck.
Gilbert Roberton and Dempster regularly taking on KPF's and doing well.
198cm Carlisle coming in 2017.
196 Goddard waiting in the wings.
More Roberton/Dempster/Gilbert types developing at Sandy.
Interest in a few other KPD's
It doesnt take much sense to work out what's going on.

But no lets react to what other teams have in place.
Havent you had enough of doing that?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Thoughts on Bruce as 2nd Ruck

Post: # 1630278Post Con Gorozidis »

Does anyone else find it amusing that the Dogs pay the same amount for Boyd that we pay for all three of Bruce, Membrey and McCartin.


Post Reply