Hurley!!!!!

[Con Gorozidis]

Hurley has about as much chance as signing with the Saints as Heppell.
Another stonecold ice block.

(Having said that I like the way stonecold goes about it. Entertainment value is good.)

[Moods]

Are the Saints talking to him?
With Carlisle he would shore up our two key defensive positions very nicely.
We won't have Goddard for much of next year and if he is good enough could play another role.
It would leave only an elite midfielder to really set up our team. -Prestia or O'meara?

My sources tell me that O'Meara is shot. Would be a waste of time. It's doubtful he'll come back to AFL footy in any meaningful way

[saintspremiers]

Are the Saints talking to him?
With Carlisle he would shore up our two key defensive positions very nicely.
We won't have Goddard for much of next year and if he is good enough could play another role.
It would leave only an elite midfielder to really set up our team. -Prestia or O'meara?

My sources tell me that O'Meara is shot. Would be a waste of time. It's doubtful he'll come back to AFL footy in any meaningful way

Given O'M would've been worth a first rounder if his body was right we will now trade him for a third round pick and there will be high fives all round. And then he'll never play for us!

[stonecold]

Finally it all makes sense.

Well, were on that, how was the Ice?????

[stonecold]

Hugh for a drug cheat? Get off the grass and stop smoking it.

I wasn't suggesting trading Hugh but finding a role other than centre half-back.
I wold only want Hurley if we can get him as a free agent.

I was replying to stone cold mate.

Well then, use the quote button your replying too!!!!!

So, are you saying I'm a drug cheat too, are you?????

I wouldnt know.

You tell me.



The real stone cold probably was.

Backing Down now, are you

[saynta]

Hugh for a drug cheat? Get off the grass and stop smoking it.

I wasn't suggesting trading Hugh but finding a role other than centre half-back.
I wold only want Hurley if we can get him as a free agent.

I was replying to stone cold mate.

Well then, use the quote button your replying too!!!!!

So, are you saying I'm a drug cheat too, are you?????

I wouldnt know.

You tell me.



The real stone cold probably was.

No, of course not. Show me where I accused you of being a drug cheat.

Backing Down now, are you

[satchmo]

Finally it all makes sense.

Well, were on that, how was the Ice?????

You mistaking me for hurley, or another customer?

[stonecold]

Finally it all makes sense.

Well, were on that, how was the Ice?????

You mistaking me for hurley, or another customer?

No, the Ice Challenge on Monday Ed, didn't have to spoil by wearing your sponsors suit though!!!!!

[stonecold]

Hurley has about as much chance as signing with the Saints as Heppell.
Another stonecold ice block.

(Having said that I like the way stonecold goes about it. Entertainment value is good.)

My man tells me, that whilst we are a slim chance, Micheal is far from over the line at Essendon, that's all I'm saying!!!!!

[Playon]

I heard its about 2% chance

[stonecold]

I heard its about 2% chance

From Whom?????

[Playon]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

[stonecold]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

[yipper]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

stonecold. Are we talking to him?

[Playon]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

Its more than contact, weve spoken to him twice, the club has the feeling that he will remain at the bombers, So basically he's just shopping to see what he's worth. On top of that we wont trade a pick for him and he would be required to be a DFA. Which players don't do these days.

Not my info but from the itk, and he rates our chances at 2%. MG would be the most reliable source at BF, however jaxons from here is more reliable, wish he'd post more

[stonecold]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

Its more than contact, weve spoken to him twice, the club has the feeling that he will remain at the bombers, So basically he's just shopping to see what he's worth. On top of that we wont trade a pick for him and he would be required to be a DFA. Which players don't do these days.

Not my info but from the itk, and he rates our chances at 2%. MG would be the most reliable source at BF, however jaxons from here is more reliable, wish he'd post more

Fair enough then, when was your last correspondence????? Cause my understanding is things have changed a little since Micheal meet with Wosha last Saturday, that's all!!!!!

Not doubting you or your contact, just asking!!!!!

[Impatient Sainter]

My gut feel is if he leaves it will be too Hawthorn or Collingwood after they off load Cloke. If he does go to the Pies it might push Nathan Brown out, who would be worth a look...

[saynta]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

Its more than contact, weve spoken to him twice, the club has the feeling that he will remain at the bombers, So basically he's just shopping to see what he's worth. On top of that we wont trade a pick for him and he would be required to be a DFA. Which players don't do these days.

Not my info but from the itk, and he rates our chances at 2%. MG would be the most reliable source at BF, however jaxons from here is more reliable, wish he'd post more

To my mind tony74 is the only one really itk and he hasn't said anything, has he?

[magnifisaint]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

Its more than contact, weve spoken to him twice, the club has the feeling that he will remain at the bombers, So basically he's just shopping to see what he's worth. On top of that we wont trade a pick for him and he would be required to be a DFA. Which players don't do these days.

Not my info but from the itk, and he rates our chances at 2%. MG would be the most reliable source at BF, however jaxons from here is more reliable, wish he'd post more

To my mind tony74 is the only one really itk and he hasn't said anything, has he?

He only likes to post training reports because the cub knows who he is.

[saynta]

Again, itk from BF, who is very reliable.

I can do the whole story but don't feel like it as I'd rather concentrate on the more likely targets in mind.

Ok, then, it's more than 2% chance though, contact only counts as 2% these days?????

Its more than contact, weve spoken to him twice, the club has the feeling that he will remain at the bombers, So basically he's just shopping to see what he's worth. On top of that we wont trade a pick for him and he would be required to be a DFA. Which players don't do these days.

Not my info but from the itk, and he rates our chances at 2%. MG would be the most reliable source at BF, however jaxons from here is more reliable, wish he'd post more

To my mind tony74 is the only one really itk and he hasn't said anything, has he?

He only likes to post training reports because the cub knows who he is.

Maybe.

[Playon]

Fair enough then, when was your last correspondence????? Cause my understanding is things have changed a little since Micheal meet with Wosha last Saturday, that's all!!!!!

Not doubting you or your contact, just asking!!!!!

He hasnt posted anything more about it for maybe a week or 2

[Playon]

To my mind tony74 is the only one really itk and he hasn't said anything, has he?

Thats a little unfair, jaxons has been more than reliable and spot on most of the time.I could dig up some of his posts, but then you've read them anyway.
MG and starno#4 have also been pretty good.
Not even the club has been 100% accurate

[Goose is king]

I would of thought anyone ITK on this matter would be quiet.

[Playon]

Why?"

Under AFL laws, players can meet with rival clubs whenever they want, and clubs can even offer terms, should the player indicate he wants to leave his current club. But a player cannot sign legally binding "contracts, agreements, arrangements or understandings".

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/m ... z4BozRSvbm

Hasn't stopped The Demons chasing Hibberd, the cats out of the bag

[Goose is king]

Because the club and Hurley wouldn't want the pressure of the story being out. Melbourne have had to hose things down and downplay the situation after the comments were made. Many in principal signings would happen mid year and be denied by all. Just like Dangerfield. I'm sure if Hurley had agreed to come to the Saints or any other club he would want that to remain secret even if just for Essendons sake. If Hurley walked now their fans would be devistated.