Team v dogs

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Team v dogs

Post: # 1604100Post kosifantutti »

Rd2 Teams released:
StKv WB
P.McCartin , J.Sinclair in for Templeton, Acres
WB unchanged


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604102Post longtimesaint »

kosifantutti wrote:Rd2 Teams released:
StKv WB
P.McCartin , J.Sinclair in for Templeton, Acres
WB unchanged
Acres is pretty unlucky -they must have committed to play Gresham for at least two!


One year will be our year
Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604103Post Sobraz »

While I am a Dunstan fan and think he'll be a long term star, I feel Acres provided more last weekend, especially in the 3rd where we really got on top.

Both are integral to our future in any case, just think Dunstan a little lucky at Acres' expense.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604104Post bigcarl »

Acres must be injured, I thought he was one of our best


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604106Post loris »

bigcarl wrote:Acres must be injured, I thought he was one of our best
Yes I think he might be 'sore' - as Richo in one of his interviews this week mentioned being pleased with Acres game.

So he's either sore, injured or has been a naughty boy this week & being disciplined???????

More likely it's just match - ups that has caused his lack of selection :? :? :?


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3385
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604107Post older saint »

I smell a late change. Acres played probably his best game for the club last week and barring a discipline issue it makes no sense.


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3638
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604110Post saintbob »

Acres out, surely they're taking the piss!!!

Dunstan should've been dropped first


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604111Post Griggsy »

Acres omitted is a surprise, if he was sore would you still have him in emergencies? not surprised about templeton.

Happy with Paddy, lacked another target up forward will Roo up the ground


The_President
Club Player
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604117Post The_President »

Acres is so stiff!!


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604119Post Bluthy »

Ok so maybe they feel Acres will struggle to backup with a six day break from a tough road trip against super-fast dogs. Not happy but I'll accept it. But then what about Gresham? He was way off the pace last week, just 9 touches including a few in junk time and couldn't rotate through the midfield when our other mids were exhausted. Minchington has a good tank on him, in superb form after 44 touches 4 goals, had great form from the end of last year, can play small forward and rotate through the midfield and has done his dues.

I think its a bad error. Gresham has become the coaches pet right off the bat. He'll be great but needs to develop a tank and get used to the speed of professional footy. I think we'll rue his selection like we did last week and run out of gas.


The OtherThommo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5062
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604123Post The OtherThommo »

Bluthy wrote:Ok so maybe they feel Acres will struggle to backup with a six day break from a tough road trip against super-fast dogs. Not happy but I'll accept it. But then what about Gresham? He was way off the pace last week, just 9 touches including a few in junk time and couldn't rotate through the midfield when our other mids were exhausted. Minchington has a good tank on him, in superb form after 44 touches 4 goals, had great form from the end of last year, can play small forward and rotate through the midfield and has done his dues.

I think its a bad error. Gresham has become the coaches pet right off the bat. He'll be great but needs to develop a tank and get used to the speed of professional footy. I think we'll rue his selection like we did last week and run out of gas.
Not sure I'd call it a "bad error", Bluthy. The young fella might well deserve a chance to have a second game back closer to home. Based on reports of the PA supporters remaining wholly feral, and the fact it was the kid's 1st game, he may have actually done enough to warrant another go in the minds of those who decide these things.

The Acres thing is a little perplexing though - "soreness", I hope.


'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604126Post Con Gorozidis »

Have to feel for meatball. Cant get an opportunity to play mid at AFL level. Maybe he isnt good enough but surely hes earnt an opportunity to show it one way or another?


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604127Post loris »

Just went back & looked at the Richo's video that is e-mailed to members post the game on Sunday. There are only 4 players he singles out by name to give a positive bent to his message. They are: Hickey, Acres, Ross & Armo.

I'm sure he said more about Acres in his AFL Coaches press interview.

so Acres is an interesting omission.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604128Post Bluthy »

The OtherThommo wrote:
Not sure I'd call it a "bad error", Bluthy. The young fella might well deserve a chance to have a second game back closer to home. Based on reports of the PA supporters remaining wholly feral, and the fact it was the kid's 1st game, he may have actually done enough to warrant another go in the minds of those who decide these things.

The Acres thing is a little perplexing though - "soreness", I hope.
o

I didn't think Gresham should have been played last week Thommo. He had only played half a game and then you throw him into his first senior AFL game away against a possible top four team? We were basically a rotation down because of him. And now against the super fast dogs when he only has 6 days to recover? its borderline crazy.

I have no doubt Richo pushed hard for the Carlisle trade due to his connection with Jake at Bombers. As part of selling that trade he may have pushed for Jade as bargain. Thats fine - our recruiting has been good with Richo so whatever his level of influence its seems to be working well. But you couldn't wipe the grin off Richo's face when he told Jade he was playing AFL. I think Jade is his little protege. Again that may work out long term but I think its comprising our ability to run with the dogs this week and we may well get a toweling.
Last edited by Bluthy on Thu 31 Mar 2016 7:35pm, edited 1 time in total.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604129Post loris »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Have to feel for meatball. Cant get an opportunity to play mid at AFL level. Maybe he isnt good enough but surely hes earnt an opportunity to show it one way or another?
Con, who is 'meatball'? :? :?


wasoncestkil58
Club Player
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 8:27pm
Location: WA
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604131Post wasoncestkil58 »

I am guessing Minchington


User avatar
evo
Club Player
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
Location: Wimmera
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604132Post evo »

loris wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Have to feel for meatball. Cant get an opportunity to play mid at AFL level. Maybe he isnt good enough but surely hes earnt an opportunity to show it one way or another?
Con, who is 'meatball'? :? :?
Minchington.


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604133Post Moods »

I'm disappointed with both omissions to be honest.Paddy probably needs to come in to give the bigger blokes some assistance. I expect a FAR better game from Roo this week being the occasion and the fact that he's had his one off game for the year. Not sure Paddy is needed as much others think though. We need the speed and the grunt and there is a big ? mark over Paddy's second and third efforts once the ball hits the ground.


The_President
Club Player
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604134Post The_President »

Moods wrote:I'm disappointed with both omissions to be honest.Paddy probably needs to come in to give the bigger blokes some assistance. I expect a FAR better game from Roo this week being the occasion and the fact that he's had his one off game for the year. Not sure Paddy is needed as much others think though. We need the speed and the grunt and there is a big ? mark over Paddy's second and third efforts once the ball hits the ground.

A lot of games will go into Paddy and Goddard this year to fast track them. That's the plan


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6084
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604137Post MC Gusto »

Acres out WTF?!

Tony where are you? What's the oil?


#1 Ryder fan
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604138Post dragit »

If Acres is genuinely dropped then it is a stupid move... Could just damage his confidence after playing his best game for the club... He did more than a few others in only his 11th game.

The guy needs game time.

Billings, Montagna, Steven, Sinclair, Lonie, Gresham makes us pretty damn short too.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4344
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604140Post cwrcyn »

I know many will disagree, but I think Acres needs to show a bit more urgency at the contest. At times he's flat footed and allows opponents to run past him. His kicking is also quite poor and needs to improve. I'm not convinced, in the same way I wasn't convince about Seb Ross, but Ross is now showing he was worth persisting with. I hop Acres will make the same improvement...hopefully a little quicker than Seb.


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604143Post bigred »

Minchington... fkn seriously what does he need to do!

His performance last year in Sandringham's losing prelim side was nothing short of astounding. One of the best halves of clearance work you will ever see...at any level. He was that good.

37 touches, seven tackles and 2 goals. Along with something stupid like 14 clearances.

Now I reckon Sinclair is a beauty and really should be in the best 22, but Minch has much better scope in the middle as second string. No question.

If Minch gets similar numbers AGAIN against Port Melbourne this week then he must surely be breaking that door down. I honestly think he will cement a spot in the seniors this year.

I was really looking forward to him getting a go...
Last edited by bigred on Thu 31 Mar 2016 10:04pm, edited 1 time in total.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
saint-stu
Club Player
Posts: 1192
Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
Has thanked: 268 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604147Post saint-stu »

cwrcyn wrote:I know many will disagree, but I think Acres needs to show a bit more urgency at the contest. At times he's flat footed and allows opponents to run past him. His kicking is also quite poor and needs to improve. I'm not convinced, in the same way I wasn't convince about Seb Ross, but Ross is now showing he was worth persisting with. I hop Acres will make the same improvement...hopefully a little quicker than Seb.
Totally agree. I'm very hopeful, but right now his kicking isn't good enough. He looks much better when he sticks to winning the ball and handballing it out.


1ac46a38
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1604150Post Con Gorozidis »

SInclair gets 27 possessions and 3 goals - selection committee calls it 'nearly 40' and '4 goals'.

http://www.saints.com.au/video/2016-03- ... -round-two

Minch actually gets 44 and 3 goals. No mention.

I want SInclair's PR agent down there. Doing a great sales job.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Fri 01 Apr 2016 2:00pm, edited 1 time in total.


Post Reply