Changes against the Dogs
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Minch for Gresham.
Kid had a taste and seen the benchmark first hand, now knows where he is at and where he has to get to.
Paddy for Eli. We looked way too small up forward with 1 of roo or Bruce either off or up the ground. We were kicking high and long to Lonie
Kid had a taste and seen the benchmark first hand, now knows where he is at and where he has to get to.
Paddy for Eli. We looked way too small up forward with 1 of roo or Bruce either off or up the ground. We were kicking high and long to Lonie
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23163
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Nice post but I would put my money on your boy Dunstan getting theflick way way before SebLinton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
Re: Changes against the Dogs
I haven't seen any of Boyd this year but they say he is actually jumping at the footy now instead of standing there with arms outstretched like a statue. He's a good matchup for Goddard as they are both big units that aren't fantastically athletic yet. You'd be tempted to play Goddard almost as a training exercise - this is the guy you might well be playing on in a grand final - you might as well start working him out now.saintsRrising wrote:Boyd is not that good a player. There are many more serious threats that needs to be covered first. Boyd will only have a day out if we are being slaughtered elsewhere anyway.Bluthy wrote:But can Fisher cover Boyd? That's another big ask. Goddard would slow us down but then Dempster isn't exactly quick these days.BigMart wrote:We won't need height down back against the dogs, we'll need run and speak cover...
I think we need another tall fwd though.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Seriously? Seb had 30 touches. It's been a very slow burn but I think he has finally arrived.saynta wrote:Nice post but I would put my money on your boy Dunstan getting theflick way way before SebLinton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
1ac46a38
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Fisher did a manful job on a 200cm 100kg Dixon... A better player than Boyd
Until they started dominating the Midfield, Fisher had smashed him... 10 possessions to 3 halfway through the third
Dixon ended up with 3 but with that supply he should. Fisher ended up with 19 possessions, and in the last quarter was one of the few players to get a kick
Until they started dominating the Midfield, Fisher had smashed him... 10 possessions to 3 halfway through the third
Dixon ended up with 3 but with that supply he should. Fisher ended up with 19 possessions, and in the last quarter was one of the few players to get a kick
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23163
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
saint-stu wrote:Seriously? Seb had 30 touches. It's been a very slow burn but I think he has finally arrived.saynta wrote:Nice post but I would put my money on your boy Dunstan getting theflick way way before SebLinton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
Im a Seb fan. I should have said nice try.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Sorry I was replying to LL.saynta wrote:saint-stu wrote:Seriously? Seb had 30 touches. It's been a very slow burn but I think he has finally arrived.saynta wrote:Nice post but I would put my money on your boy Dunstan getting theflick way way before SebLinton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
Im a Seb fan. I should have said nice try.
1ac46a38
- evo
- Club Player
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
- Location: Wimmera
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
One at least of Lee/Minch should come in, or their papers are marked IMO. Maybe McCartin and Goddard could do with another week or two at Sandy. I can only go on what I saw on TV but Dunstan, Savage, Templeton and Geary must be on shakey ground, Gresham too.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
In Paddy, Sinclair and Lee
Out Eli, Gresham and Dunstan.
Out Eli, Gresham and Dunstan.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
This looks about right.Bernard Shakey wrote:In Paddy, Sinclair and Lee
Out Eli, Gresham and Dunstan.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
No doubt the match ups will be looked at.
We will need depth in the mid-field to counteract their possession running game - noting that the fade out on Sunday was when we just could not get numbers around the contest because our strength until then was the waves of bodies at the contest - every Port Adelaide player had been under pressure - then we just seemed unable to pressure and create so there were multiple PA players running forward in support catching us out and where the Savage, Geary and Webster were caught out because they were run past (so liability with the ball turned into liability because they were being beaten man on man, including losing their feet just far, far too often making it easy for PA) and PA's high profile recruit was on the end of one on one contests where he received frees resulting in each his 3 goals.
So Stringer is a danger.
Does Gilbert go back to keep him honest?
To me Gilbert would be the ideal match up.
This open up a mid-field position, noting that some of our mids did not have the impact expected and required so may be under pressure anyway given VFL form and training track presentations.
In my view we just can not "lose" Bruce to rucking relief - and he and Mc Cartin should always be fixtures in our forward line, so perhaps Gresham out for Mc Cartin (and we have Lonie anyway).
Roo then has licence to support as and where required at his and the panel Coaches' discretion.
So does this mean that Longer comes in - and what is the impact on our ability to run, because they run.
Where and how can we mis-match them?
By pushing Hickey forward?
By Gilbert taking Stringer away from goal and forcing Stringer to defend?
And one thing for certain is that we can not afford the ball handling mistakes aka Geary and Savage because they will be punished severely - and we can not afford to lose our feet in the contest allowing their players to run off with no opposition, create havoc and look a million dollars - and making others look a million dollars as well.
These are the questions - and those under pressure from their performances last Sunday are pretty obvious.
Just to add, I thought Dunstan was up and about in tight including blocking and tackles (allowing for the hit he took) and was surprised he was only credited with 10 possessions.
Perhaps they gave some of Dunstan's to Ross?
We will need depth in the mid-field to counteract their possession running game - noting that the fade out on Sunday was when we just could not get numbers around the contest because our strength until then was the waves of bodies at the contest - every Port Adelaide player had been under pressure - then we just seemed unable to pressure and create so there were multiple PA players running forward in support catching us out and where the Savage, Geary and Webster were caught out because they were run past (so liability with the ball turned into liability because they were being beaten man on man, including losing their feet just far, far too often making it easy for PA) and PA's high profile recruit was on the end of one on one contests where he received frees resulting in each his 3 goals.
So Stringer is a danger.
Does Gilbert go back to keep him honest?
To me Gilbert would be the ideal match up.
This open up a mid-field position, noting that some of our mids did not have the impact expected and required so may be under pressure anyway given VFL form and training track presentations.
In my view we just can not "lose" Bruce to rucking relief - and he and Mc Cartin should always be fixtures in our forward line, so perhaps Gresham out for Mc Cartin (and we have Lonie anyway).
Roo then has licence to support as and where required at his and the panel Coaches' discretion.
So does this mean that Longer comes in - and what is the impact on our ability to run, because they run.
Where and how can we mis-match them?
By pushing Hickey forward?
By Gilbert taking Stringer away from goal and forcing Stringer to defend?
And one thing for certain is that we can not afford the ball handling mistakes aka Geary and Savage because they will be punished severely - and we can not afford to lose our feet in the contest allowing their players to run off with no opposition, create havoc and look a million dollars - and making others look a million dollars as well.
These are the questions - and those under pressure from their performances last Sunday are pretty obvious.
Just to add, I thought Dunstan was up and about in tight including blocking and tackles (allowing for the hit he took) and was surprised he was only credited with 10 possessions.
Perhaps they gave some of Dunstan's to Ross?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Well boy was I wrong about our saints. BRILLIANT they were.
Id love to see:
Out: Gresham (good job but need to cycle youngsters)
Geary. (Great effort cgrade disposal)
In: Sinclair, McCartin
Remember it was a praccy vfl match. Lets not go nuts.
Id love to see:
Out: Gresham (good job but need to cycle youngsters)
Geary. (Great effort cgrade disposal)
In: Sinclair, McCartin
Remember it was a praccy vfl match. Lets not go nuts.
- prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
How did Billy Longer play for Sandy? Seems like meatball earned himself an opportunity... 44 touches and 4 goals was it? An effort like that screams 'I really don't want to play magoos all season again'. If anyone saw his effort in the second half of the Prelim last year for Sandy... Mitch might be ready to take the next step. The little fella nearly lifted them over the line, magnificent stuff.
McCartin... maybe.. maybe.. if he's ready to go. Gresh got a taste of it, a great reward for a hard pre season. Give him a few weeks for Sandy and make him want it even more.
I'm GUESSING.... Templeton and Gresh for McCartin and Meatball. It must be tempting to play Sinclair as well. Tough choices at the selection table, I thought everyone showed a little something in the seniors on Sunday.
Dempster looked off it a bit though... maybe he just got caught out of position a few times but that will be interesting to watch.
McCartin... maybe.. maybe.. if he's ready to go. Gresh got a taste of it, a great reward for a hard pre season. Give him a few weeks for Sandy and make him want it even more.
I'm GUESSING.... Templeton and Gresh for McCartin and Meatball. It must be tempting to play Sinclair as well. Tough choices at the selection table, I thought everyone showed a little something in the seniors on Sunday.
Dempster looked off it a bit though... maybe he just got caught out of position a few times but that will be interesting to watch.
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Regarding Boyd, I saw a bit of the Dogs game on the weekend and he looked dangerous, but was getting the ball a long way from home. He played a fair bit in the ruck, and pushed higher up the ground.
I get the feeling we'll have a few frustrating moments on Saturday night where our team defence allows Boyd a mismatch, where whichever key defender is picking him up (Fisher/Dempster) stays back and Boyd pushes up.
That said, we did look too small, but the Dogs running game tore Freo to shreds, so I think the structure stays for now, and we make changes based on form. Minch sounds like the best from the VFL, but I dont think anyone disgraced themselves in the seniors. Dunstan has been named a few times in this thread, but I thought he had more impact this week than a lot of his games last season where he might have got more than 10 possessions.
I get the feeling we'll have a few frustrating moments on Saturday night where our team defence allows Boyd a mismatch, where whichever key defender is picking him up (Fisher/Dempster) stays back and Boyd pushes up.
That said, we did look too small, but the Dogs running game tore Freo to shreds, so I think the structure stays for now, and we make changes based on form. Minch sounds like the best from the VFL, but I dont think anyone disgraced themselves in the seniors. Dunstan has been named a few times in this thread, but I thought he had more impact this week than a lot of his games last season where he might have got more than 10 possessions.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23163
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Wasn't sure.saint-stu wrote:Sorry I was replying to LL.saynta wrote:saint-stu wrote:Seriously? Seb had 30 touches. It's been a very slow burn but I think he has finally arrived.saynta wrote:Nice post but I would put my money on your boy Dunstan getting theflick way way before SebLinton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
Im a Seb fan. I should have said nice try.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
With Carlisle = I think we could beat the Dogs.
Without him will be tough.
But the media are in love with the Dogs and Geelong so if we can get a win this week it will be huge.
Without him will be tough.
But the media are in love with the Dogs and Geelong so if we can get a win this week it will be huge.
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 793 times
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Ross racked up the disposals, and was arguably not that damaging with them, but to say he should be dropped is crazy talk.Linton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
I reckon Minchington in for Eli and Gresham gets another crack.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Hilarious!! 30 possessions against one of the best midfields in the entire comp and you want Ross dropped.Linton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
Half of those 30 touches went out on the full or to the opposition.saint-stu wrote:Seriously? Seb had 30 touches. It's been a very slow burn but I think he has finally arrived.saynta wrote:Nice post but I would put my money on your boy Dunstan getting theflick way way before SebLinton Lodger wrote:Out: Ross & Gresham
In: McCartin & Sinclair
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Changes against the Dogs
He is a beast & will be a clearance king.freely wrote:Drop Dunstan? Really? Game high 9 tackles...