Those are not the correct numbers for Carlisle.BigMart wrote:No
Andrew Lovett was the worst recruiting decision in history.
1 Million over 3 years, money tied up in the SC and he was detested.
Carlisle is only a loss of 650k for the one season
But really that means for 2017/18 contract he will be on around 1 million per season. Slightly overpaid for a guy who's only finished top ten in a b&f once in 6 seasons
Carlisle ban?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Only thing that matters is that he's ours now.
And it's not like we didn't realise this may happen.
If we hope to get anything out of our "investment" then we need to stand by him and support him. He seems like the sort of bloke who could really go off the rails if he's left to his own devices.
The bloke's still very important to our long term plans.
#standbyjake
And it's not like we didn't realise this may happen.
If we hope to get anything out of our "investment" then we need to stand by him and support him. He seems like the sort of bloke who could really go off the rails if he's left to his own devices.
The bloke's still very important to our long term plans.
#standbyjake
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Carlisle can't even train with us.
By 2017 he will probably be an overweight ice addict.
- with StKilda providing an income stream!
By 2017 he will probably be an overweight ice addict.
- with StKilda providing an income stream!
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Suck it up. It's happened and no amount of whining will change it.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Carlisle ban?
WADA was always going to whack them. They don't like being lied to and being stuffed around. They also need to be seen to have "teeth" when it comes to these issues. The decision to recruit him was a calculated risk, but IMHO, one worth taking. He will still have 6-7 years left in him and we'll need him at his best in 2017 and beyond, when we will start to genuinely challenge again. With a Fisher still there, it's not a tragedy. The unexpected bonus of Goddard last year also softens the blow. Make no mistake, Carlisle is a gun. Potentially elite and rated by many at Essendope as being in their top three just two years ago. Deep breath, everyone. Not good, but no disaster either.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
- Location: Ballarat
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
F*#K!!!
We al knew that we got screwed when this trade happened. But now we've lost a no. 5 pick (no offence to Jade) to the dons it time to draw a line in the sand when it comes to trading with them. Dont give them anything not even a fair trade!
Very angry!!!
We al knew that we got screwed when this trade happened. But now we've lost a no. 5 pick (no offence to Jade) to the dons it time to draw a line in the sand when it comes to trading with them. Dont give them anything not even a fair trade!
Very angry!!!
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Carlisle ban?
Hear, hear, Dr. S. He's ours now. Let's make the best of a bad situation.Dr Spaceman wrote:Only thing that matters is that he's ours now.
And it's not like we didn't realise this may happen.
If we hope to get anything out of our "investment" then we need to stand by him and support him. He seems like the sort of bloke who could really go off the rails if he's left to his own devices.
The bloke's still very important to our long term plans.
#standbyjake
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
If this is true that we're not allowed to pay him then at least the club is not pouring money down the drain like it did with lovett .BackFromUSA wrote:Not allowed to pay him.Vazelos wrote:Huge loss to our structure. Fish was looking forward to not playing On the gorillas. The only positive is it fast tracks Goddard
Spewing. Will we have to pay him? Would that money be insured?
He can sue Essendon for the loss of income.
I believe his contract was front loaded
So more than $700k
I just hope that a year out of football doesn't hurt his ability too much .
It doesn't take a lot for the game to pass you by .
In red white and black from 73
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
+1. Let's just suck it up and get on with it. I'm pretty sure we planned for this so let's have some faith in that.White Winmar wrote:Hear, hear, Dr. S. He's ours now. Let's make the best of a bad situation.Dr Spaceman wrote:Only thing that matters is that he's ours now.
And it's not like we didn't realise this may happen.
If we hope to get anything out of our "investment" then we need to stand by him and support him. He seems like the sort of bloke who could really go off the rails if he's left to his own devices.
The bloke's still very important to our long term plans.
#standbyjake
Always loyal
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
+1 big picture people, big picture hereWhite Winmar wrote:WADA was always going to whack them. They don't like being lied to and being stuffed around. They also need to be seen to have "teeth" when it comes to these issues. The decision to recruit him was a calculated risk, but IMHO, one worth taking. He will still have 6-7 years left in him and we'll need him at his best in 2017 and beyond, when we will start to genuinely challenge again. With a Fisher still there, it's not a tragedy. The unexpected bonus of Goddard last year also softens the blow. Make no mistake, Carlisle is a gun. Potentially elite and rated by many at Essendope as being in their top three just two years ago. Deep breath, everyone. Not good, but no disaster either.
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
As I put on here when Essendon FC self reported, they are in very serious trouble - and despite all the nonsense, denial froth and bubble from that "great" Corporate Leader, the very unpleasant and dictatorial Little and the equally unpleasant individual Hird, this is the outcome - as it was always going to be from my informant on this matter (who is unfortunately no longer with us to see the outcome he predicted).
I feel for the players.
Competition, environment peer group pressure, egos et al mainfest also in sporting clubs (and elsewhere).
So, if the Club is promoting such a program as Essendon did then competition and peer group pressure impacts on player decisions - because the players wish to remain on an AFL List and play AFL football with the Club they are contracted to.
I would absolve the players in these circumstances and put penalty where it rightly belongs - on the Essendon Football Club, its Directors and its administration (not playing) servants.
Essendon FC should be disbanded (and maybe the actions it will now attract will collapse it financially particularly given its debt profile).
Its Directors and administration (not playing) servants should be banned - including into other pursuits so, for example, Little is banned from Directorships full stop - including Corporate.
In terms of St Kilda and other Clubs who have recruited disallusioned former Essendon players (and those players remaining on Essendon's List), 2016 will pass so age and desire will come into the equation for 2017 and onwards.
Much the same as a player "doing" an ACL and missing a season - except there is no rehabilitation.
So St Kilda still have Carlisle's contribution to look forward to - and the Club should embrace him and move forward on that basis.
In terms of the List, St Kilda have had an enduring problem with key defenders (hence Delaney - and Goddard) and a cornerstone of addressing that very significant deficiency remains in place.
So, to those complaining, as always, look past the nose on your face to the ultimate outcome you are attempting to achieve.
The building blocks are still there.
And we have another Drafting and Trading period where Carlisle, a 198cm key defender with ability, is the cream on the cake because he is already locked away.
I feel for the players.
Competition, environment peer group pressure, egos et al mainfest also in sporting clubs (and elsewhere).
So, if the Club is promoting such a program as Essendon did then competition and peer group pressure impacts on player decisions - because the players wish to remain on an AFL List and play AFL football with the Club they are contracted to.
I would absolve the players in these circumstances and put penalty where it rightly belongs - on the Essendon Football Club, its Directors and its administration (not playing) servants.
Essendon FC should be disbanded (and maybe the actions it will now attract will collapse it financially particularly given its debt profile).
Its Directors and administration (not playing) servants should be banned - including into other pursuits so, for example, Little is banned from Directorships full stop - including Corporate.
In terms of St Kilda and other Clubs who have recruited disallusioned former Essendon players (and those players remaining on Essendon's List), 2016 will pass so age and desire will come into the equation for 2017 and onwards.
Much the same as a player "doing" an ACL and missing a season - except there is no rehabilitation.
So St Kilda still have Carlisle's contribution to look forward to - and the Club should embrace him and move forward on that basis.
In terms of the List, St Kilda have had an enduring problem with key defenders (hence Delaney - and Goddard) and a cornerstone of addressing that very significant deficiency remains in place.
So, to those complaining, as always, look past the nose on your face to the ultimate outcome you are attempting to achieve.
The building blocks are still there.
And we have another Drafting and Trading period where Carlisle, a 198cm key defender with ability, is the cream on the cake because he is already locked away.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Ben Cousins has the right attributes.Kate wrote:Essendon have already got permission to use top up players from the VFL.
We should push to be allowed 1 top up player to replace Carlisle on our list.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Best post yet, well said and very balanced view. This will still work out very well for us remembering that without the whole saga, we would have not been able to gain Jake at all. Still many positives hereTo the top wrote:As I put on here when Essendon FC self reported, they are in very serious trouble - and despite all the nonsense, denial froth and bubble from that "great" Corporate Leader, the very unpleasant and dictatorial Little and the equally unpleasant individual Hird, this is the outcome - as it was always going to be from my informant on this matter (who is unfortunately no longer with us to see the outcome he predicted).
I feel for the players.
Competition, environment peer group pressure, egos et al mainfest also in sporting clubs (and elsewhere).
So, if the Club is promoting such a program as Essendon did then competition and peer group pressure impacts on player decisions - because the players wish to remain on an AFL List and play AFL football with the Club they are contracted to.
I would absolve the players in these circumstances and put penalty where it rightly belongs - on the Essendon Football Club, its Directors and its administration (not playing) servants.
Essendon FC should be disbanded (and maybe the actions it will now attract will collapse it financially particularly given its debt profile).
Its Directors and administration (not playing) servants should be banned - including into other pursuits so, for example, Little is banned from Directorships full stop - including Corporate.
In terms of St Kilda and other Clubs who have recruited disallusioned former Essendon players (and those players remaining on Essendon's List), 2016 will pass so age and desire will come into the equation for 2017 and onwards.
Much the same as a player "doing" an ACL and missing a season - except there is no rehabilitation.
So St Kilda still have Carlisle's contribution to look forward to - and the Club should embrace him and move forward on that basis.
In terms of the List, St Kilda have had an enduring problem with key defenders (hence Delaney - and Goddard) and a cornerstone of addressing that very significant deficiency remains in place.
So, to those complaining, as always, look past the nose on your face to the ultimate outcome you are attempting to achieve.
The building blocks are still there.
And we have another Drafting and Trading period where Carlisle, a 198cm key defender with ability, is the cream on the cake because he is already locked away.
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
YesEnrico_Misso wrote:Ben Cousins has the right attributes.Kate wrote:Essendon have already got permission to use top up players from the VFL.
We should push to be allowed 1 top up player to replace Carlisle on our list.
And whatever he takes is undetectable !
A much better player than Carlisle
In red white and black from 73
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004 12:36pm
Re: Carlisle ban?
Take outOn the Ball wrote:The list is:
Essendon
Hibberd, Michael
Bellchambers, Tom
Watson, Jobe
Stanton, Brent
Zaharakis, David
Baguley, Mark
Dempsey, Courtenay
Pears, Tayte
Hurley, Michael
Merrett, Jackson
Heppell, Dyson
Myers, David
Hooker, Cale
Colyer, Travis
Hocking, Heath
Howlett, Ben
Melbourne
Melksham, Jake
Port Adelaide
Ryder, Patrick
Monfries, Angus
St Kilda
Carlisle, Jake
Western Bulldogs
Crameri, Stewart
Zaharakis, David
Baguley, Mark
Merrett, Jackson as they're outside of the suspended group.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
This is is a real rubbish statement. Hawthorn were keen as were a few others. Save the bulls*** for your arse.Locals322 wrote:A decision consistent with out mediocre past. Parish looks good though.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Carlisle ban?
Why should St Kilda suffer in this instance?
Essendon should be the only club to suffer the consequences of their wrong doing - what they gained and what we lost from the Carlisle trade should be reversed. It's only fair and right.
If it can't be reversed this year, then some sort of concessions from Essendon to us next year should apply.
Essendon should be the only club to suffer the consequences of their wrong doing - what they gained and what we lost from the Carlisle trade should be reversed. It's only fair and right.
If it can't be reversed this year, then some sort of concessions from Essendon to us next year should apply.
Last edited by samoht on Tue 12 Jan 2016 9:32am, edited 1 time in total.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Carlisle ban?
I wonder what Hurley, Watson and Heppell will be doing in 2017? Let's get into them and their management from day one. Let's kick the Essendope corpse and use their self inflicted misfortune to advance our cause. Imagine picking one of those up for free. Hope Jake is on good terms with some of his former team mates. We may yet emerge out of all of this, way ahead.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Agreed. I'm just going to pretend we're drafting him next year and add him to that crop.White Winmar wrote:Hear, hear, Dr. S. He's ours now. Let's make the best of a bad situation.Dr Spaceman wrote:Only thing that matters is that he's ours now.
And it's not like we didn't realise this may happen.
If we hope to get anything out of our "investment" then we need to stand by him and support him. He seems like the sort of bloke who could really go off the rails if he's left to his own devices.
The bloke's still very important to our long term plans.
#standbyjake
I'll call it the 'best drafting ever'