Strain and tear are interchangeable words nowadays.Con Gorozidis wrote:'strain' doesnt sound too bad. If it was 'tear' id be worried. they are probably just being cautious and he is probably thinking about it a lot/lacks confidence. just needs time and patience.
Nathan Freeman does hammy
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
So who would we have gotten with our 2nd rounder next year if you are so knowledgeable?saintspremiers wrote:I'm sorry mr know it all if I wasn't happy with us trading away our 2nd round pick for next year. Sure, no drama if we finish 10th but if it's another (likely) bottom four finish its a high price to pay.Bunk_Moreland wrote:I don't know why you even support the Saints. Nothing is ever good enough for yousaintspremiers wrote:I'm delighted we only traded away our 2nd round pick not our 1st round pick for a zero gamer with very dodgy hammies
I don't know why you call yourself Bunk.
Nobody cares if you are unhappy or not. Your football knowledge is less than a small child's. Your kids, who are the only ones who sit with you at the football would have more understanding.
You show time and time again your ignorance and all you can do is complain like a spoilt child.
What in hell would you know about trading.Ill tell you. Like the rest of us SFA.
You are garbage - Enough said
- MC Gusto
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6084
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
yeah...not the best news lets be honest.
doubt colling are laughing..nobody wants to see a young player plagued by injuries no matter the circumstances.
look let's treat it for what it is, a strain in december, and hope that it helps further inform our team on how to manage the young fella. All we want is to see him on the park.
re what we traded - my view is we traded far too much for him and the big fella, given the circumstances surrounding them nominating us etc but whats done is done. the team there knows a hell of a lot more than me~
doubt colling are laughing..nobody wants to see a young player plagued by injuries no matter the circumstances.
look let's treat it for what it is, a strain in december, and hope that it helps further inform our team on how to manage the young fella. All we want is to see him on the park.
re what we traded - my view is we traded far too much for him and the big fella, given the circumstances surrounding them nominating us etc but whats done is done. the team there knows a hell of a lot more than me~
#1 Ryder fan
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
NiceBunk_Moreland wrote:So who would we have gotten with our 2nd rounder next year if you are so knowledgeable?saintspremiers wrote:I'm sorry mr know it all if I wasn't happy with us trading away our 2nd round pick for next year. Sure, no drama if we finish 10th but if it's another (likely) bottom four finish its a high price to pay.Bunk_Moreland wrote:I don't know why you even support the Saints. Nothing is ever good enough for yousaintspremiers wrote:I'm delighted we only traded away our 2nd round pick not our 1st round pick for a zero gamer with very dodgy hammies
I don't know why you call yourself Bunk.
Nobody cares if you are unhappy or not. Your football knowledge is less than a small child's. Your kids, who are the only ones who sit with you at the football would have more understanding.
You show time and time again your ignorance and all you can do is complain like a spoilt child.
What in hell would you know about trading.Ill tell you. Like the rest of us SFA.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Two week hamstring... so it's just tight or SLIGHTLY tweeked. I'm guessing they're treating him with kid gloves. Perfect timing given the heavy training load he's just been through and it's right on the xmas/new year break. Doubt he'll miss much at all.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
my worry is that Collingwood's own sports and meds personnel, with a considerably larger budget than own own, couldn't get him right. Why would we?
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Small tear, i believeprwilkinson wrote:Two week hamstring... so it's just tight or SLIGHTLY tweeked. I'm guessing they're treating him with kid gloves. Perfect timing given the heavy training load he's just been through and it's right on the xmas/new year break. Doubt he'll miss much at all.
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
Agreed but bargains if they work out. That's the risk you take. There is a bigger risk recruiting an unknown.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
But all truesaintspremiers wrote:NiceBunk_Moreland wrote:So who would we have gotten with our 2nd rounder next year if you are so knowledgeable?saintspremiers wrote:I'm sorry mr know it all if I wasn't happy with us trading away our 2nd round pick for next year. Sure, no drama if we finish 10th but if it's another (likely) bottom four finish its a high price to pay.Bunk_Moreland wrote:I don't know why you even support the Saints. Nothing is ever good enough for yousaintspremiers wrote:I'm delighted we only traded away our 2nd round pick not our 1st round pick for a zero gamer with very dodgy hammies
I don't know why you call yourself Bunk.
Nobody cares if you are unhappy or not. Your football knowledge is less than a small child's. Your kids, who are the only ones who sit with you at the football would have more understanding.
You show time and time again your ignorance and all you can do is complain like a spoilt child.
What in hell would you know about trading.Ill tell you. Like the rest of us SFA.
You are garbage - Enough said
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
But I guess when Collingwood recruited Freeman he was an unknown......... hasn't been able to get on the park (except for a few VFL games) with Collingwood........... so for us to take him on we are still recruiting a virtual "unknown" just he's a few years older with no track record (apart from hammy injuries) ..... A real risky Unknown IMHO.ripplug66 wrote:bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
Agreed but bargains if they work out. That's the risk you take. There is a bigger risk recruiting an unknown.
Let's hope he gets over this latest setback and can eventually get to play footy for the Saints and then we can see if this 'unknown' has been worth the risk eh?
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
loris wrote:But I guess when Collingwood recruited Freeman he was an unknown......... hasn't been able to get on the park (except for a few VFL games) with Collingwood........... so for us to take him on we are still recruiting a virtual "unknown" just he's a few years older with no track record (apart from hammy injuries) ..... A real risky Unknown IMHO.ripplug66 wrote:bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
Agreed but bargains if they work out. That's the risk you take. There is a bigger risk recruiting an unknown.
Let's hope he gets over this latest setback and can eventually get to play footy for the Saints and then we can see if this 'unknown' has been worth the risk eh?
That's true but the pies didn't want to lose him so it suggests in 2 years of training they have seen he is up to AFL level.
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Might just be like Hamill's 2 week minor knee injury?prwilkinson wrote:Two week hamstring... so it's just tight or SLIGHTLY tweeked. I'm guessing they're treating him with kid gloves. Perfect timing given the heavy training load he's just been through and it's right on the xmas/new year break. Doubt he'll miss much at all.
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
If Rice doesn't work out it may be one of our worst ever drafts.bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Enrico_Misso wrote:If Rice doesn't work out it may be one of our worst ever drafts.bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
Dont know about ever but we have had some shockers in the last decade that will be hard to bottom. 2008-2010 really were dark drafts. If you want to know why we finished bottom in 2014 you dont have to look too far to figure it out:
2008
Heyne, Lynch, Stanley, Young, Cahill, Begley
2009
Miles, Winmar (the not good one), Smith, Pattison, Johnson
2010
Crocker, Ledger, Gamble, Simpkin, Polo, Cripps
0/17 still on our list.
Some that we missed out on
Dayne Beams (08 pick 29)
Dan Hannebery (08 pick 30 - Oakleigh Chargers)
Liam Shiels (08 pick 34)
Steve Motlop (08 pick 39)
Mitch Robinson (08 pick 40)
Rory Sloane (08 pick 44)
Nat Fyfe (09 pick 20)
Jack Gunston (09 pick 29 Sandy Dragons)
Alan Christensen (09 pick 40)
Taylor Duryea (09 pick 69)
Cameron OShea (10 pick 52)
Ok looking at 2010 - it was a pretty s*** draft outside the top 10 so that one wasnt our fault.
08 was an awesome draft. Loads of good players in there which is quite amusing when you consider Jack Watts was pick one.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Haven't seen that info in a while. Makes you shake your head doesn't it. Thank you Ross.Con Gorozidis wrote:
2008
Heyne, Lynch, Stanley, Young, Cahill, Begley
2009
Miles, Winmar (the not good one), Smith, Pattison, Johnson
2010
Crocker, Ledger, Gamble, Simpkin, Polo, Cripps
0/17 still on our list.
Some that we missed out on
Dayne Beams (08 pick 29)
Dan Hannebery (08 pick 30 - Oakleigh Chargers)
Liam Shiels (08 pick 34)
Steve Motlop (08 pick 39)
Mitch Robinson (08 pick 40)
Rory Sloane (08 pick 44)
Nat Fyfe (09 pick 20)
Jack Gunston (09 pick 29 Sandy Dragons)
Alan Christensen (09 pick 40)
Taylor Duryea (09 pick 69)
Cameron OShea (10 pick 52)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Then again, if Carlisle pulls his head in, the young kids become good players and Freeman's hammies behave, it might be one of our best ever drafts. Really it's too early to say so what's the point of getting all sooky now?Enrico_Misso wrote:If Rice doesn't work out it may be one of our worst ever drafts.bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 861 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Well, let's be honest, Carlisle is risky because we are awaiting the outcome of a tribunal, which, if he is found guilty, could see him miss 2 years of playing and training. Personally, I think if he doesn't get suspended he will be a very good/great player for us. Very, very handy.Enrico_Misso wrote:If Rice doesn't work out it may be one of our worst ever drafts.bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
Freeman needs to get his legs right - if he misses training over the Xmas/New Year period when they are off anyway, having done all of the early heavy fitness stuff, I couldn't care less, to be honest. Aussie Jones had dodgy hammies for a while and then he eventually got them right. Freeman didn't leave Collingwood because of his hammies, he left them because he wanted to play for the Saints.
Rice will be an absolute beauty, and he was a bargain anyway.
Carlisle and Freeman are no bigger risks than speculating how a young draftee will come up. How's Toumpas, Scully and Watts going?
This is going to be a development year anyway, so my expectations of winning % is low - less than 33% again, so 6, maybe 7 wins, so it is all about finding who is in our best 22, and who do we need to get in the following draft/trading period while we are still low enough on the ladder to get a high draft pick.
Last edited by samuraisaint on Fri 18 Dec 2015 7:43am, edited 1 time in total.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
st.byron wrote:Haven't seen that info in a while. Makes you shake your head doesn't it. Thank you Ross.Con Gorozidis wrote:
2008
Heyne, Lynch, Stanley, Young, Cahill, Begley
2009
Miles, Winmar (the not good one), Smith, Pattison, Johnson
2010
Crocker, Ledger, Gamble, Simpkin, Polo, Cripps
0/17 still on our list.
Some that we missed out on
Dayne Beams (08 pick 29)
Dan Hannebery (08 pick 30 - Oakleigh Chargers)
Liam Shiels (08 pick 34)
Steve Motlop (08 pick 39)
Mitch Robinson (08 pick 40)
Rory Sloane (08 pick 44)
Nat Fyfe (09 pick 20)
Jack Gunston (09 pick 29 Sandy Dragons)
Alan Christensen (09 pick 40)
Taylor Duryea (09 pick 69)
Cameron OShea (10 pick 52)
No wonder we did no good in the draft if RL was picking them. I think people need to realise he has bugger to do with the drafted players but would have had a bit to do with the traded players. Some of previous drafters weren't to good either. Not sure that makes it the coaches fault. Was SW good at drafting?
As for others thinking the worst about a draft in December, well I don't get the point.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Because we already know Gresham and White are duds.Enrico_Misso wrote:If Rice doesn't work out it may be one of our worst ever drafts.bergholt wrote:We paid a lot for a guy with terrible injury history and eight weeks later he was injured again.
We paid even more for a known d**khead and within eight hours he was in trouble.
They were both high risk decisions. Let's hope the long run sees them OK because right now they look dubious in the extreme.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Reminds me of Plugger too.... he was always 2 weeks away for a couple of months with his back at one stage. Rob Harvey couldn't get his hammy's right for the first few years of his career and he turned into a pretty handy player. Freeman will be right. Stick with the positives. He's at the back end of a very heavy training block and he completed 99% of it. It's the perfect time for him to be tapered off for a few weeks.WinnersOnly wrote:Might just be like Hamill's 2 week minor knee injury?prwilkinson wrote:Two week hamstring... so it's just tight or SLIGHTLY tweeked. I'm guessing they're treating him with kid gloves. Perfect timing given the heavy training load he's just been through and it's right on the xmas/new year break. Doubt he'll miss much at all.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
WinnersOnly wrote:Might just be like Hamill's 2 week minor knee injury?prwilkinson wrote:Two week hamstring... so it's just tight or SLIGHTLY tweeked. I'm guessing they're treating him with kid gloves. Perfect timing given the heavy training load he's just been through and it's right on the xmas/new year break. Doubt he'll miss much at all.
Actually he is about four months from playing a competitive game - quick panic
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Aussie?samuraisaint wrote:Aussie Jones had dodgy hammies for a while and then he eventually got them right.
He played 19 in his first season, then 22, 25, 23, 19. Was barely injured in his whole career.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Nathan Freeman does hammy
Harves played 18 games in 1990 - aged 18
Played 23 games in 1991 - aged 19.
Amazing how we mythologise the past to tell ourselves something pleasant about the current.
Played 23 games in 1991 - aged 19.
Amazing how we mythologise the past to tell ourselves something pleasant about the current.