Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
If we play a backline of Geary, Fisher, Dempster, Gilbert, Carlisle, Savage every week we will have oldest back-line in the AFL.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Wed 25 Nov 2015 4:55pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
Is that fact? I think Gilbert will play in the middle a fair bit but I do think most of the others will play every week in the backline baring injury or loss of form. Webster will play in the backline and that makes it younger. That will be 3 out of the 6 under 25 and also Fisher will miss some games with injury if he continues the run he has had over the last few years.Con Gorozidis wrote:If we play a backline of Geary, Fisher, Dempster, Gilbert, Carlisle, Roberton every week we will have oldest back-line in the AFL.
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
Ok maybe I was being a bit generous with top 5, but for mine he is well ahead of Roberton, Weller, Webster, and potentially Fisher and Joey (in 2016).skeptic wrote:RiewoldtSobraz wrote:Gilbo is an absolute lock if fit. He's in the first 5 selected, incredibly versatile and has some serious weapons. On the wing, through the middle, at half forward. Height, speed, tackling machine, brilliant overhead mark and spoil, kicking not nearly as bad as many suggest despite the odd mega shank. A gun.
Montagna
Armitage
Steven
Dempster
Roberton
Bruce
Fisher
Weller
Webster
Carlisle
First 5 selected!
Name the 6 he stomps
All this is on the presumption of full fitness and a solid pre season. His midfield/wing work is outstanding and will be a major weapon for us in 2016.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
Roberton finished 6th in the B & F.Sobraz wrote:
Ok maybe I was being a bit generous with top 5, but for mine he is well ahead of Roberton, Weller, Webster, and potentially Fisher and Joey (in 2016).
All this is on the presumption of full fitness and a solid pre season. His midfield/wing work is outstanding and will be a major weapon for us in 2016.
Saying Gilbo is 'well-ahead' of him is off the charts crazy.
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
They are if 18-21yo players are gun AFlL players
Of course they are not
One on one
Gilbert and Geary would flog nearly all of those named
They
Are tougher, fitter, stronger and at this stage better than any of the kids... It's why they been on an AFL list for 8-10 years and have played 150 games
Of course they are not
One on one
Gilbert and Geary would flog nearly all of those named
They
Are tougher, fitter, stronger and at this stage better than any of the kids... It's why they been on an AFL list for 8-10 years and have played 150 games
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
Con got it wrong then, they are List Floggers..BigMart wrote:They are if 18-21yo players are gun AFlL players
Of course they are not
One on one
Gilbert and Geary would flog nearly all of those named
TheyAre tougher, fitter, stronger and at this stage better than any of the kids... It's why they been on an AFL list for 8-10 years and have played 150 games
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Re: Gilbert and Geary - surplus to requirements?
They may well end up better players... But not ATM
I think McKenzie will be excellent eventually
Newnes is already very good
Billings and Lonie will be A Grade or Elite
For a few reasons I rate Minchington
Webster is a hit and miss kick... He is dodgy with the ball
Wright, Murdoch, Templeton all have. Attributes but clear weaknesses
Robertson is a solid (Ray type) foot soldier
The boy just drafted
Savage is not great in contested situations
Shenton is just a back up... With some attributes
I think McKenzie will be excellent eventually
Newnes is already very good
Billings and Lonie will be A Grade or Elite
For a few reasons I rate Minchington
Webster is a hit and miss kick... He is dodgy with the ball
Wright, Murdoch, Templeton all have. Attributes but clear weaknesses
Robertson is a solid (Ray type) foot soldier
The boy just drafted
Savage is not great in contested situations
Shenton is just a back up... With some attributes