Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earlier
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Lots of crazy conspiracy theories. Who gives a s***. It's not going to change anything.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
The truth always matters,at the very it helps all involved to make better decisions in the future.
However changes have already been made, and if the AFL didn't give a sh*t they wouldn't be investigating.
However changes have already been made, and if the AFL didn't give a sh*t they wouldn't be investigating.
- Clayton Davis
- Club Player
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2015 7:47pm
- Location: West Baltimore
- Contact:
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Sheeeiiittt yeah, partner!!!markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Bethsides, we don't all need Jakey boy till our premyersheeeiiip year o' 2018.
Warning: Press only in situations of extreme disbelief!
######### http://shiiiit.com/ #########
####### #######
About a simple man who was horrifically punished by
the powers that be for the terrible crime of trying to
bring light to the common people.
######### http://shiiiit.com/ #########
####### #######
About a simple man who was horrifically punished by
the powers that be for the terrible crime of trying to
bring light to the common people.
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15583
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Yep... And you think we'd be compensated in the meantime too.Clayton Davis wrote:Sheeeiiittt yeah, partner!!!markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Bethsides, we don't all need Jakey boy till our premyersheeeiiip year o' 2018.
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Fantasyland stuff. The club wont cop any penalty and the players may get a slap on the wrist.
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15583
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
I did say hope.ripplug66 wrote:markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Fantasyland stuff. The club wont cop any penalty and the players may get a slap on the wrist.
But I don't think WADA appealed and hired Richard Young with the belief or expectation that they'll be brushed with a lettuce leaf should they be found guilty.
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
My god is anyone else allowed to have an opinion without you putting them down. You aren't everyones dad you know.ripplug66 wrote:markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Fantasyland stuff. The club wont cop any penalty and the players may get a slap on the wrist.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Correct, except it will allow us to smash Carlisle's contract down.magnifisaint wrote: It's not going to change anything.
It also doesn't do a lot for relations between St Kilda and Essendon Their failure to disclose what they knew is going to make it very difficult to do business with Dildoro again.
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
bob__71 wrote:My god is anyone else allowed to have an opinion without you putting them down. You aren't everyones dad you know.ripplug66 wrote:markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Fantasyland stuff. The club wont cop any penalty and the players may get a slap on the wrist.
Of course he can have an opinion and I didn't put him down. Just don't think it has a hope of happening. As Mark pointed out they got a good lawyer to hopefully get the players to be found guilty but I don't think the club are in anyones sites. I also think if the players are found guilty that WADA will be happy even if the penalty is small. And how do you know I'm not everyones Dad?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Good for you.If you were doing drugs with them, you can keep them.The Linton Street Flash wrote:loris wrote:Maybe those 'blokes/friends, of the flakey one might not consider him a 'mate/friend'......... they might just consider he needs to get all the crap he deserves heaped on him for some reason................ Often it ends up as - no such thing a 'friends' when you become a user.Con Gorozidis wrote:Exactly. Not a great crew. Bad enough one bloke sold the videos. Now it seems a few blokes were prepared to do the same thing. Thats a fair sign you need a new bunch of mates.Playon wrote:You call those friends?Con Gorozidis wrote:I think Jakey boy needs to get himself some new friends.
That "no such thing a 'friends' when you become a user" is such a load of crap.
When i was a youngster (over 20 years ago) I was a user of various drugs, some of the friends I made in that period of my life remain my closest and dearest freinds to this day - it might sound good on commercial TV or at an AA meeting but I'm afraid its a load of old bollocks!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Who else did heaps of drugs on Melbourne Cup day?
I did with my family, nieces and nephews, and in laws.
All types too. Beer, wine, spirits.
All sorts of drugs.
Saw a woman who I assume was of her face on the alcohol drug push over a police officer.
This drug is everywhere and is insidious. So many addicts and so many crimes committed because of that terrible let drug.
Drugs are bad.
I did with my family, nieces and nephews, and in laws.
All types too. Beer, wine, spirits.
All sorts of drugs.
Saw a woman who I assume was of her face on the alcohol drug push over a police officer.
This drug is everywhere and is insidious. So many addicts and so many crimes committed because of that terrible let drug.
Drugs are bad.
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
Careful mate, someone on-line will mis-interpret that!Bunk_Moreland wrote:Who else did heaps of drugs on Melbourne Cup day?
I did with my family, nieces and nephews, and in laws.
All types too. Beer, wine, spirits.
All sorts of drugs.
Saw a woman who I assume was of her face on the alcohol drug push over a police officer.
This drug is everywhere and is insidious. So many addicts and so many crimes committed because of that terrible let drug.
Drugs are bad.
USELESS FACT: The WADA case against Essendon (in Sydney as well) is exactly 10 years to the day that Australia qualified for the 2006 FIFA World Cup.
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
And what legal basis do you pose such insight on? Where is your legal expertise to give us such comment?ripplug66 wrote:bob__71 wrote:My god is anyone else allowed to have an opinion without you putting them down. You aren't everyones dad you know.ripplug66 wrote:markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Fantasyland stuff. The club wont cop any penalty and the players may get a slap on the wrist.
Of course he can have an opinion and I didn't put him down. Just don't think it has a hope of happening. As Mark pointed out they got a good lawyer to hopefully get the players to be found guilty but I don't think the club are in anyones sites. I also think if the players are found guilty that WADA will be happy even if the penalty is small. And how do you know I'm not everyones Dad?
USELESS FACT: The WADA case against Essendon (in Sydney as well) is exactly 10 years to the day that Australia qualified for the 2006 FIFA World Cup.
Re: Channel Seven offered Jake Carlisle film nine days earli
IanRush wrote:And what legal basis do you pose such insight on? Where is your legal expertise to give us such comment?ripplug66 wrote:bob__71 wrote:My god is anyone else allowed to have an opinion without you putting them down. You aren't everyones dad you know.ripplug66 wrote:markp wrote:I hope they're found guilty at the CAS hearing and the club is banned from fielding a team for 2 years.
Fantasyland stuff. The club wont cop any penalty and the players may get a slap on the wrist.
Of course he can have an opinion and I didn't put him down. Just don't think it has a hope of happening. As Mark pointed out they got a good lawyer to hopefully get the players to be found guilty but I don't think the club are in anyones sites. I also think if the players are found guilty that WADA will be happy even if the penalty is small. And how do you know I'm not everyones Dad?
And what is you cut and paste qualifications for cut and pasting all the time or your hooker experience for calling a girl a hooker? I have no legal knowledge at all. I have an opinion that's not clouded by other stuff.