Jake Carlisle

[Con Gorozidis]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

[ripplug66]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

Sinclair will be one of those unless we delist a couple more and get an even later pick which is the way to go IMO.

[FortiusQuoFidelius]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

Sinclair will be one of those unless we delist a couple more and get an even later pick which is the way to go IMO.

Most likely will use 68 to upgrade Sinclair

[saynta]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

You need to have three live picks in the draft, so we have to delist at least two more players.

[saynta]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

Sinclair will be one of those unless we delist a couple more and get an even later pick which is the way to go IMO.

Most likely will use 68 to upgrade Sinclair

Later than that, much later I suspect.

[Con Gorozidis]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

You need to have three live picks in the draft, so we have to delist at least two more players.

Ok - well we may not need 63 for Rice.

Does Sinclair count as a 'live' pick?

[ripplug66]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

You need to have three live picks in the draft, so we have to delist at least two more players.

Ok - well we may not need 63 for Rice.

Does Sinclair count as a 'live' pick?

Yes and has always and so does Rice. I have no idea how many have been delisted but if we use one pick we need 5 delisted. Obviously if we use 2 picks we need 6 delisted.

[saynta]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

You need to have three live picks in the draft, so we have to delist at least two more players.

Ok - well we may not need 63 for Rice.

Does Sinclair count as a 'live' pick?

Well, it didn't in the past. Don't know if they changed the rules last year.I remember them fiddling around the edges.

[markp]

I hope they use pick 5 on a gumby.

[Wrote for Luck]

104.3 just announced deal has been done three way involves Sydney.

Gold FM...Long time breaker of big footy stories
Well...they used to be 3KZ...And 3KZ is football.

yes I was reluctant to add this Gold comment but guilty dancing with my toddlers to Would I Lie To You.

[desertsaint]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

where is Freeman in all this?

[prwilkinson]

Good deal. I am happy with that. Essentially we get Carlisle for pick 14.

We lock in Rice (45+63) and we get two live picks in the draft - 14 + 44

where is Freeman in all this?

Freeman deal complete. Basically next year's 2nd rounder.

[saintsRrising]

Deal is Calrlisle done, Saints gave up 5 & 24.
Saints got back 14 and 44 and Carlisle.

So that is about 1079 points. So Carlise cost the Saints about pick 15. Which is what most reasonable people on both sides thought.

ie Not worth Pick 5, but worth more than Pick 24.

The deal as worked out also means that Saints have the likely points for Rice as a FS without risking our first pick being downgraded in 2016 which would have happened if we were short on too many points.

[saintbrat]

Jakey boy had better work hard and be worth it..........




and we haven't given up a players

[saynta]

Deal is Calrlisle done, Saints gave up 5 & 24.
Saints got back 14 and 44 and Carlisle.

So that is about 1079 points. So Carlise cost the Saints about pick 15. Which is what most reasonable people on both sides thought.

ie Not worth Pick 5, but worth more than Pick 24.

The deal as worked out also means that Saints have the likely points for Rice as a FS without risking our first pick being downgraded in 2016 which would have happened if we were short on too many points.

So what did the swans get out of the deal for craig Bird?

[longtimesaint]

Deal is Calrlisle done, Saints gave up 5 & 24.
Saints got back 14 and 44 and Carlisle.

So that is about 1079 points. So Carlise cost the Saints about pick 15. Which is what most reasonable people on both sides thought.

ie Not worth Pick 5, but worth more than Pick 24.

The deal as worked out also means that Saints have the likely points for Rice as a FS without risking our first pick being downgraded in 2016 which would have happened if we were short on too many points.

So what did the swans get out of the deal for craig Bird?

They exchanged pick 14 for 5 -a good deal for them!

[saynta]

Deal is Calrlisle done, Saints gave up 5 & 24.
Saints got back 14 and 44 and Carlisle.

So that is about 1079 points. So Carlise cost the Saints about pick 15. Which is what most reasonable people on both sides thought.

ie Not worth Pick 5, but worth more than Pick 24.

The deal as worked out also means that Saints have the likely points for Rice as a FS without risking our first pick being downgraded in 2016 which would have happened if we were short on too many points.

So what did the swans get out of the deal for craig Bird?

They exchanged pick 14 for 5 -a good deal for them!

So the swans have pick 5?

[Sainternist]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

[uptheboys]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we also get pick 14 and 44

[longtimesaint]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we have pick 14 coming back which is a lot better than keeping 24.
Also we get 44 which can be used for Rice or Sinclair.

[Sainternist]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we also get pick 14 and 44

Ah, my bad. Gotcha. Very good.

[saynta]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we have pick 14 coming back which is a lot better than keeping 24.
Also we get 44 which can be used for Rice or Sinclair.

You would use your last draft pick on sinclair which currently is in the early hundreds

[Con Gorozidis]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we have pick 14 coming back which is a lot better than keeping 24.
Also we get 44 which can be used for Rice or Sinclair.

You would use your last draft pick on sinclair which currently is in the early hundreds

Yeah - surely we use a very late pick on Sinclair?

[longtimesaint]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we have pick 14 coming back which is a lot better than keeping 24.
Also we get 44 which can be used for Rice or Sinclair.

You would use your last draft pick on sinclair which currently is in the early hundreds

Yeah - surely we use a very late pick on Sinclair?

It looks like we will pass on quite a few picks.

[saynta]

So we've given up picks 5 and 24 in order to land Carlisle? Wouldn't we have been better off just doing a straight swap with pick 5 for Carlisle?

No because we have pick 14 coming back which is a lot better than keeping 24.
Also we get 44 which can be used for Rice or Sinclair.

You would use your last draft pick on sinclair which currently is in the early hundreds

Yeah - surely we use a very late pick on Sinclair?

yep.

As it stood this morning the Saints still had picks 5, 24, 45, 68, 81, 99 and 117 at next month’s National Draft.

Now we have picks 14, 44, 45 ,68, 81, 99 and 117.

Not hard to find out.