What ! You post some outlandish scenario's then winge to the mods like the name changer does when you get called out for your crap.citywest wrote:Charming.True Believer wrote:citywest wrote:Hey Simon, I have no doubt that plugger66 is already back on with a new nic. If he continues posting in the same fashion (which I am sure he will), you should consider IP banning him for life. This should be the rule for all of the rogue posters who play the man rather than give opinions and create proper discussion regarding the St Kilda FC.
And you should consider keeping out of it and keeping your head down troll.......
Another little pet of the mods..........
Bye all
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- evo
- Club Player
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
- Location: Wimmera
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Bye all
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15583
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Bye all
Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Bye all
Can we have some clarity around the saynta/stinger situation from the mods?
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
I thought those polls were lobbying to get him back - not a breach. But I haven't read each and every post. If any are abusiive or breach any rules then the mods will deal with it.dragit wrote:My apologies for the assumption.BackFromUSA wrote: Firstly I didn't lock it.
I recall a similar post about plugger many months ago was dealt in the same way.
Is plugger fair game for ridicule now that he can't reply though?
The other two poll threads are going, maybe because stinger hasn't reported them…
How is he being ridiculed?
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: Bye all
Yes this exact question needs to be asked ...markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: Bye all
Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
Saynta and Stinger never breached the rule. In fact they never posted in the same thread that we can see.dragit wrote:Can we have some clarity around the saynta/stinger situation from the mods?
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
Read the rule. It is only a breach of the nic is used to support the other nic in an argument.
It is not against the rule that have a second nic - some posters have multiple nics and use them with our blessing (I get a big kick out of one particular poster) for humerous good and not destructive evil - the ones who use it for evil - usually get the nic banned.
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
Simple. None of the 3 mods were on at the time. Once it was discovered it was moved from the forum as from memory locked. We try not to delete as we are mindful of the desire for posters to have freedom of speech.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Bye all
Okay, so if I show you where they have posted in the same thread can we get that life ban enacted? Cause we know they are the same person...BackFromUSA wrote:Saynta and Stinger never breached the rule. In fact they never posted in the same thread that we can see.dragit wrote:Can we have some clarity around the saynta/stinger situation from the mods?
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
Read the rule. It is only a breach of the nic is used to support the other nic in an argument.
It is not against the rule that have a second nic - some posters have multiple nics and use them with our blessing (I get a big kick out of one particular poster) for humerous good and not destructive evil - the ones who use it for evil - usually get the nic banned.
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: Bye all
both still open as of today .... Very convenient that the stinger one got closed within minutes of being created in the general forum ... So basically you are wanting us to believe those two threads got missed cause no mods were on to see it in the main forum yet the stinger one was noticed by a mod with in seconds in the general forum .... ReallyBackFromUSA wrote:Simple. None of the 3 mods were on at the time. Once it was discovered it was moved from the forum as from memory locked. We try not to delete as we are mindful of the desire for posters to have freedom of speech.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
Stinger and Saynta are treated by us as different entities - just as Plugger66 would be if he came on as another nic and he would have a clean sheet and live and die by his actions as the new nic.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Yes this exact question needs to be asked ...markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
If plugger registers again and continues down the same path then he will have his IP banned.
The poster to which your angst towards seems from my reading to respond to hostility and abuse directed towards him. I see a claim of baiting in this thread - but can't find it. Please point it out to me? Was it deleted? Also claims of baiting in other threads. Where? I have not seen that poster bait unless his mere existence or opinions (to which he is entitled even if they disagree with yours or the majority) are the baits claimed ... As I say ... Show me the baits!!! Report them. I certainly see the abuse.
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Bye all
I was tryng to stay out of this thread because it was quickly descending into farce, but the above post is clearly a breach of the rules.dragit wrote:Okay, so if I show you where they have posted in the same thread can we get that life ban enacted? Cause we know they are the same person...BackFromUSA wrote:Saynta and Stinger never breached the rule. In fact they never posted in the same thread that we can see.dragit wrote:Can we have some clarity around the saynta/stinger situation from the mods?
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
Read the rule. It is only a breach of the nic is used to support the other nic in an argument.
It is not against the rule that have a second nic - some posters have multiple nics and use them with our blessing (I get a big kick out of one particular poster) for humerous good and not destructive evil - the ones who use it for evil - usually get the nic banned.
"GRIEVANCES
Please note that all official warnings will be done via PM to the offending poster and the warning and the reason for the warning will be published within the offending post as an aid to assist all posters in identifying and understanding breaches.
Should a Moderator be required to edit a post, this will be shown in the post and a warning and explanation issued in private to that poster via PM.
If a person wishes to discuss this further, please do so with the Moderation team via PM.
The Moderation team have the final say and are here to provide a fun environment for us to celebrate all things St Kilda Football Club.
Please accept the umpire's decision and move on.
The above penalty system gives you three chances before your enjoyment of the community will be restricted. Take advantage of those three chances to improve your conduct.
Do not start threads requesting discipline of other members, nor PM the Moderators requesting punishment.
You are entitled to report behaviour you believe contravenes the rules, but it will be at the Moderator discretion as to the punishment required."
this poster is clearly requesting that you (bfusa)consider banning me.
I maintain that i have done nothing to warrant a life ban, and i certainly have not recently been involved in disputes.arguments or in an exchnge of abuse with plugga. I find that attempts to involve me are distasteful and offensive in the extreme.
Looking at the posters involved though is highly informative, for the mods that is.
Last edited by saynta on Wed 23 Sep 2015 7:27pm, edited 1 time in total.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Bye all
I saw it.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:both still open as of today .... Very convenient that the stinger one got closed within minutes of being created in the general forum ... So basically you are wanting us to believe those two threads got missed cause no mods were on to see it in the main forum yet the stinger one was noticed by a mod with in seconds in the general forum .... ReallyBackFromUSA wrote:Simple. None of the 3 mods were on at the time. Once it was discovered it was moved from the forum as from memory locked. We try not to delete as we are mindful of the desire for posters to have freedom of speech.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
I thought it was designed to bait a particular poster.
I locked it.
If there are other threads that should be locked, please provide the links.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Bye all
And you have my gratitude. Thank you very much. Of course it was baiting.kosifantutti wrote:I saw it.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:both still open as of today .... Very convenient that the stinger one got closed within minutes of being created in the general forum ... So basically you are wanting us to believe those two threads got missed cause no mods were on to see it in the main forum yet the stinger one was noticed by a mod with in seconds in the general forum .... ReallyBackFromUSA wrote:Simple. None of the 3 mods were on at the time. Once it was discovered it was moved from the forum as from memory locked. We try not to delete as we are mindful of the desire for posters to have freedom of speech.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
I thought it was designed to bait a particular poster.
I locked it.
If there are other threads that should be locked, please provide the links.
I would also appreciate the thread being deleted in full because of that very reason.
i find it extremely offensive and it should not remain for others to snigger at. In my humble opinion.
- Armoooo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7281
- Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
- Location: The Great South East
- Contact:
Re: Bye all
Can we please stop pretending that an IP ban is any more significant than a 5 minute suspension. There are countless ways to get around them, even though the main pests are self confessed computer illiterates I'm sure they can manage a quick google search telling them which extension to install to their browser.
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Bye all
You sound really worriedsaynta wrote:I was tryng to stay out of this thread because it was quickly descending into farce, but the above post is clearly a breach of the rules.dragit wrote:Okay, so if I show you where they have posted in the same thread can we get that life ban enacted? Cause we know they are the same person...BackFromUSA wrote:Saynta and Stinger never breached the rule. In fact they never posted in the same thread that we can see.dragit wrote:Can we have some clarity around the saynta/stinger situation from the mods?
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
Read the rule. It is only a breach of the nic is used to support the other nic in an argument.
It is not against the rule that have a second nic - some posters have multiple nics and use them with our blessing (I get a big kick out of one particular poster) for humerous good and not destructive evil - the ones who use it for evil - usually get the nic banned.
"GRIEVANCES
Please note that all official warnings will be done via PM to the offending poster and the warning and the reason for the warning will be published within the offending post as an aid to assist all posters in identifying and understanding breaches.
Should a Moderator be required to edit a post, this will be shown in the post and a warning and explanation issued in private to that poster via PM.
If a person wishes to discuss this further, please do so with the Moderation team via PM.
The Moderation team have the final say and are here to provide a fun environment for us to celebrate all things St Kilda Football Club.
Please accept the umpire's decision and move on.
The above penalty system gives you three chances before your enjoyment of the community will be restricted. Take advantage of those three chances to improve your conduct.
Do not start threads requesting discipline of other members, nor PM the Moderators requesting punishment.
You are entitled to report behaviour you believe contravenes the rules, but it will be at the Moderator discretion as to the punishment required."
this poster is clearly requesting that you (bfusa)consider banning me.
I maintain that i have done nothing to warrant a life ban, and i certainly have not recently been involved in disputes.arguments or in an exchnge of abuse with plugga. I find that attempts to involve me are distasteful and offensive in the extreme.
Looking at the posters involved though is highly informative, for the mods that is.
I thought you were staying out of this thread?
I'm not asking for you to be banned... But if I find something that warrants a life ban it should probably be reported, no doubt you'd do the same being the regular reporter they you are.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
I see both those threads were moved to the Animal Enclosure. Seems a good spot for them. Perhaps that poll should have gone there too but the mod made a pretty good call to lock it. Equally as good a call. Non of them remain available to the fan forum - not treated consistently (granted) but both provide the same outcome - they are not a part of the fan forum.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:both still open as of today .... Very convenient that the stinger one got closed within minutes of being created in the general forum ... So basically you are wanting us to believe those two threads got missed cause no mods were on to see it in the main forum yet the stinger one was noticed by a mod with in seconds in the general forum .... ReallyBackFromUSA wrote:Simple. None of the 3 mods were on at the time. Once it was discovered it was moved from the forum as from memory locked. We try not to delete as we are mindful of the desire for posters to have freedom of speech.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
I really should read those 2 plugger threads as I am not sure that I have!!!
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Bye all
This thread is like a red hot steam room - it seems its been building for a while - thoroughly enjoyable thus far
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Bye all
I have continually maintained that I haven't breached the rules, but you go your hardest. Nothing you could say or do would ever worry me. You overrate yourself.dragit wrote:You sound really worriedsaynta wrote:I was tryng to stay out of this thread because it was quickly descending into farce, but the above post is clearly a breach of the rules.dragit wrote:Okay, so if I show you where they have posted in the same thread can we get that life ban enacted? Cause we know they are the same person...BackFromUSA wrote:Saynta and Stinger never breached the rule. In fact they never posted in the same thread that we can see.dragit wrote:Can we have some clarity around the saynta/stinger situation from the mods?
I really don't think it's fair for an antagonistic & polarizing poster to change names and hide under the guise of a new identity, taking pot shots at old foes. Particularly when a poster was for years breaking a fundamental rule of not holding multiple logins which is meant to deliver a life ban.
Same goes if plugger returns… it's all good to turn over a new leaf, but pretending to be a new poster should be banned.
*edit - i'm too slow - markp cheers - exactly.
Read the rule. It is only a breach of the nic is used to support the other nic in an argument.
It is not against the rule that have a second nic - some posters have multiple nics and use them with our blessing (I get a big kick out of one particular poster) for humerous good and not destructive evil - the ones who use it for evil - usually get the nic banned.
"GRIEVANCES
Please note that all official warnings will be done via PM to the offending poster and the warning and the reason for the warning will be published within the offending post as an aid to assist all posters in identifying and understanding breaches.
Should a Moderator be required to edit a post, this will be shown in the post and a warning and explanation issued in private to that poster via PM.
If a person wishes to discuss this further, please do so with the Moderation team via PM.
The Moderation team have the final say and are here to provide a fun environment for us to celebrate all things St Kilda Football Club.
Please accept the umpire's decision and move on.
The above penalty system gives you three chances before your enjoyment of the community will be restricted. Take advantage of those three chances to improve your conduct.
Do not start threads requesting discipline of other members, nor PM the Moderators requesting punishment.
You are entitled to report behaviour you believe contravenes the rules, but it will be at the Moderator discretion as to the punishment required."
this poster is clearly requesting that you (bfusa)consider banning me.
I maintain that i have done nothing to warrant a life ban, and i certainly have not recently been involved in disputes.arguments or in an exchnge of abuse with plugga. I find that attempts to involve me are distasteful and offensive in the extreme.
Looking at the posters involved though is highly informative, for the mods that is.
I thought you were staying out of this thread?
I'm not asking for you to be banned... But if I find something that warrants a life ban it should probably be reported, no doubt you'd do the same being the regular reporter they you are.
I was never in the habit of reporting people , but the forum was degenerating into not a very nice place to be.
The mods came up with the reporting function and asked us, me included, to report breaches of the rules which had been rewritten by BFUSA, rather than reponding in kind.
In keeping with that, I don't respond to jerks but report them when i think they overstep the bounds of decency.
And yes, I want to stay out of replying in this thread, but I can't when you and your ilk keep bringing me into the discussion with the mods.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Bye all
MULTIPLE IDENTITY POLICY
Posters found to hold multiple forum identities and using them to add support to their own position within a forum argument, OR to undertake any activity that can be constituted as a breach of rules, will be penalised without any formal warning and with an ongoing permanent ban on all identities from the offending I.P. addresses.
So essentially, if say stinger has come on as saynta and started baiting an old foe under the guise of a different identity, he should be banned permanently as it is a breach of the rules?
Is that right Simon?
Posters found to hold multiple forum identities and using them to add support to their own position within a forum argument, OR to undertake any activity that can be constituted as a breach of rules, will be penalised without any formal warning and with an ongoing permanent ban on all identities from the offending I.P. addresses.
So essentially, if say stinger has come on as saynta and started baiting an old foe under the guise of a different identity, he should be banned permanently as it is a breach of the rules?
Is that right Simon?
Last edited by dragit on Wed 23 Sep 2015 7:51pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Bye all
Ok read them now. Filled with humour and banter. Nothing horrible there to my eye although I believe that Gordo Summers nic was banned for constantly starting threads and posting stuff purely aiming to bait posters. Both those threads are in the right place - because whilst the OP were warning worthy the subsequent banter was mostly very good. Not of a spat between wind sister and plugger66. But nothing too major IMHO.BackFromUSA wrote:I see both those threads were moved to the Animal Enclosure. Seems a good spot for them. Perhaps that poll should have gone there too but the mod made a pretty good call to lock it. Equally as good a call. Non of them remain available to the fan forum - not treated consistently (granted) but both provide the same outcome - they are not a part of the fan forum.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:both still open as of today .... Very convenient that the stinger one got closed within minutes of being created in the general forum ... So basically you are wanting us to believe those two threads got missed cause no mods were on to see it in the main forum yet the stinger one was noticed by a mod with in seconds in the general forum .... ReallyBackFromUSA wrote:Simple. None of the 3 mods were on at the time. Once it was discovered it was moved from the forum as from memory locked. We try not to delete as we are mindful of the desire for posters to have freedom of speech.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Can you advise why the fighting with plugger and playing with plucker threads were allowed to continue but the how to deal with stingers thread got locked straight away ??BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
I really should read those 2 plugger threads as I am not sure that I have!!!
Certainly different to the inflammatory poll although as I have said it could have been moved to the Animal Enclosure but there should have been a warning issued to whoever started that poll - was there??? Maybe they has a lucky escape?
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15583
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Bye all
You seem to have responded to a different question to the one I asked, and I'd still like it answered please.BackFromUSA wrote:Please report the exact posts where you believe the poster was baiting. I can't find them. If the mods agree they are baiting then a warning will be issued.markp wrote:Hey Simon,
If P66 registers under a new nic and decides to pretend he's not P66 (under the guise of a fresh start but really so he can bait old foes and bother all the people who previously had him on ignore), to what point will you facilitate this and allow him to carry on with the charade?
I did however stumble across some pretty abusive posts directed at one poster and that poster firing back at those that a used him.
Can't seem to find the claimed baiting. Has the post been deleted perhaps???
But further to your above response, has saynta never been warned or cautioned for abuse or baiting?
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Bye all
An interesting and very thoughtful concept SunSaint!!sunsaint wrote:oh and mods - what chance that we could rookie Plugger66 in a sub-forum?
Pluggsy could have his own subforum - the only place he could post - then other Saintsationalists could go over and argue with him and have their opinions questioned and questioned and questioned and questioned and questioned over and over and over and over and over and over again
A kind of special place where you could go if you where in the mood and happily get belittled and cut down in a monotonous never ending way
We could call it the "The Plugger66 Special Forum"
Make it happen mods!!!
Last edited by Devilhead on Wed 23 Sep 2015 8:07pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!