AFL 22 under 22

Con Gorozidis · Wed 26 Aug 2015 3:44pm

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/a ... 7499288782

Two Saints - Newnes and Longer

Timing/injury counted against Billings who is pretty clearly in that fwd group.

3/22 is pretty good.

Saintberra · Wed 26 Aug 2015 4:36pm

The final 22 has not been chosen yet?

That means it's only 2/47, unless you assumed those two are in the top 22.

Con Gorozidis · Wed 26 Aug 2015 6:03pm

Saintberra wrote:The final 22 has not been chosen yet?

That means it's only 2/47, unless you assumed those two are in the top 22.

Yep you are correct. Only 2/47 at this stage.

Goose is king · Wed 26 Aug 2015 6:26pm

Jack Viney? WTF

plugger66 · Post: # 1575428Post **plugger66** » Wed 26 Aug 2015 6:40pm

Goose is king wrote:Jack Viney? WTF

22 possessions a game and many tackles and plays on the best mid. Cant see a problem with him being in it.

saintbrat · Post: # 1575431Post **saintbrat** » Wed 26 Aug 2015 6:53pm

to go with those nominated in previous days
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=89523

saintbrat · Post: # 1580248Post **saintbrat** » Tue 15 Sep 2015 8:44pm

No Saints in the final team
http://www.aflplayers.com.au/article/22 ... -unveiled/

Con Gorozidis · Tue 15 Sep 2015 8:52pm

It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.

CURLY · Post: # 1580252Post **CURLY** » Tue 15 Sep 2015 9:07pm

Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.

Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.

plugger66 · Post: # 1580253Post **plugger66** » Tue 15 Sep 2015 9:13pm

Except Grundy had a better year

LTN16 · Post: # 1580255Post **LTN16** » Tue 15 Sep 2015 9:37pm

Billings would've been in there if he'd played a full year.

CURLY · Post: # 1580256Post **CURLY** » Tue 15 Sep 2015 9:43pm

plugger66 wrote:Except Grundy had a better year

No he didn't he was on the borderline for a while of getting dropped. I'm not sure he didn't this year actually.

SainterK · Post: # 1580293Post **SainterK** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 12:02am

This concerns me a little, if I'm being honest...

LTN16 · Post: # 1580294Post **LTN16** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 12:08am

SainterK wrote:This concerns me a little, if I'm being honest...

Me too. We only have 1 that deserves to be in there if fit..

Con Gorozidis · Wed 16 Sep 2015 12:13am

All three had solid years

http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... die-GRUNDY
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... Ed-LANGDON
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... Jake-LEVER

But what I would argue though, is that you have the best shot at making this team if you are in a mid-tiered team. Why?

If you are in a top 6 side - it is much harder to get a game.
If you are in a bottom 6 side - it is much harder to get the ball.

If you take then into account - then it is not surprising most of the guys in this team are from mid-tiered teams.

The stand-outs/outliers

Top Teams - Yeo, Neale, Parker
Bottom Teams - Saad, KK, Cripps, Lynch, Hogan

The majority (14) are from mid-tiered sides.

Rosco · Post: # 1580297Post **Rosco** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 12:17am

plus our most likely guys to be up there (i.e. our recent 1st/2nd round picks) are only 19/20 years old, i'm talking billings, dunstan, acres, mccartin, goddard, mckenzie. expect that 2 or 3 of those will make the 22u22 in the next 2 years. that's ignoring sinclair & lonie.

noddy04 · Post: # 1580300Post **noddy04** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 12:33am

CURLY wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.

Jake lever is a very very good player at this very early start to his career. I would love him in our defence .

LTN16 · Post: # 1580301Post **LTN16** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 12:41am

noddy04 wrote:
CURLY wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.

Jake lever is a very very good player at this very early start to his career. I would love him in our defence .

Has he done anything more then Hugh Goddard at this stage? Getting overrated IMO.

Con Gorozidis · Wed 16 Sep 2015 1:44am

LTN16 wrote:
noddy04 wrote:
CURLY wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.

Jake lever is a very very good player at this very early start to his career. I would love him in our defence .
Has he done anything more then Hugh Goddard at this stage? Getting overrated IMO.

Pretty similar, you are right.
Jake is a nose in front but is 6 months older and plays in a better side. But I don't see that as Lever being over-rated. I see it as HG being a gun. I think they are both stand-outs. So id take nothing away from either of them.

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_p ... 1=S&fid2=S

plugger66 · Post: # 1580317Post **plugger66** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 7:37am

CURLY wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Except Grundy had a better year
No he didn't he was on the borderline for a while of getting dropped. I'm not sure he didn't this year actually.

Don't care if he was dropped or not. Is a better all round player than Longer and was better this year. I still rate Hickey as a much better ruckman than Longer. I hope if we trade one it is Longer. Tap work doesn't do it for me unless you are a Sandilands.

FQF · Post: # 1580349Post **FQF** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 11:54am

It is hard to see who even Billings would replace in that forward line.

LTN16 · Post: # 1580359Post **LTN16** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 1:14pm

FQF wrote:It is hard to see who even Billings would replace in that forward line.

I would rate Billings better then Langdon on the bench.

Vazelos · Post: # 1580371Post **Vazelos** » Wed 16 Sep 2015 2:58pm

LTN16 wrote:Billings would've been in there if he'd played a full year.

Thats spot on.

Con Gorozidis · Wed 16 Sep 2015 3:17pm

Vazelos wrote:
LTN16 wrote:Billings would've been in there if he'd played a full year.
Thats spot on.

On the bench instead of Langdon agreed.

But thats footy. No good talking about could'ves, would'ves and should'ves.

AFL 22 under 22

AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22

Re: AFL 22 under 22