Guess the delistings
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Guess the delistings
Makes our early picks for White and Markworth look ugly on paper. Tipping Markworth will be picked up onto our rookie list.
Re: Guess the delistings
gringo wrote:In a weak draft shedding players for the sake of it seems stupid.saintspremiers wrote:Finally Siposs is gone.
I hope that list expands. We need a bit more turnover than that.
SP has no interest at all in thinking of things like that.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Rocket wrote:Makes our early picks for White and Markworth look ugly on paper. Tipping Markworth will be picked up onto our rookie list.
The form of Bruce and the unexpected availabilty of Goddard probably sealed Whites fate if in fact he has been delisted.
Markworth was about pick 50 odd in the real world due to compo picks.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Guess the delistings
CURLY wrote:Rocket wrote:Makes our early picks for White and Markworth look ugly on paper. Tipping Markworth will be picked up onto our rookie list.
The form of Bruce and the unexpected availabilty of Goddard probably sealed Whites fate if in fact he has been delisted.
Markworth was about pick 50 odd in the real world due to compo picks.
There was doubt before that as he only got a one year contract.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Well thats fair he had a heap of injuries. I think Sipposs or White may have a second chance.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Rocket wrote:Makes our early picks for White and Markworth look ugly on paper. Tipping Markworth will be picked up onto our rookie list.
The form of Bruce and the unexpected availabilty of Goddard probably sealed Whites fate if in fact he has been delisted.
Markworth was about pick 50 odd in the real world due to compo picks.
There was doubt before that as he only got a one year contract.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Hopefully we rookie Markworth which still leaves the door slightly ajar for a fairytale.
Re: Guess the delistings
The guy literally hasn't had a chance.Con Gorozidis wrote:Hopefully we rookie Markworth which still leaves the door slightly ajar for a fairytale.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Guess the delistings
I don't know if he'd be interested TBH, Richo has shown zero interest in him, made it very clear that he's not in his plans… the whole thing has been very disappointing.Con Gorozidis wrote:Hopefully we rookie Markworth which still leaves the door slightly ajar for a fairytale.
Re: Guess the delistings
How has he made that clear?dragit wrote:I don't know if he'd be interested TBH, Richo has shown zero interest in him, made it very clear that he's not in his plans… the whole thing has been very disappointing.Con Gorozidis wrote:Hopefully we rookie Markworth which still leaves the door slightly ajar for a fairytale.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Hugely disappointing not to get a single run in the ones. From what I saw of him in the first half on Sunday he continues to ooze potential.FQF wrote:The guy literally hasn't had a chance.Con Gorozidis wrote:Hopefully we rookie Markworth which still leaves the door slightly ajar for a fairytale.
Like Con, I hope there's a rookie space for him at the vey least. I still believe in fairytales ...
Always loyal
Re: Guess the delistings
I'd like to see them re-draft Markworth with a late pick or put him on the rookie list to see if he has anything? Give him another season and get his body right. If he doesn't get through the season then there's nothing lost. In effect we would be swapping Sinclair for Markworth which I'm ok with.
As for the others, no real surprises there I guess, although I'm disappointed Spencer didn't really work out.
As for the others, no real surprises there I guess, although I'm disappointed Spencer didn't really work out.
Re: Guess the delistings
And who really cares!? It's the risk you take..Rocket wrote:Makes our early picks for White and Markworth look ugly on paper. Tipping Markworth will be picked up onto our rookie list.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Guess the delistings
White, Simpkin and Siposs all were not able to get a senior game this season - to me that is not good enough so fair enough. Merkwzorth would be worth a rookie spot to see how things go . Saad was probably heading towards the fringe in his final year before suspension so not surprised , game has changed and doesn't work hard enough defensively to survive in the AFL now days.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Siposs is the one who needs to stay he is a footballer and could still be a good one - needs to really pull out a big pre season for fitness and you would hope that by now the penny has dropped-- - I think Markworth is a pipedream - would love to be proved wrong and would like to see markworth rookied for 1 more year - but not at the expense of sipossolder saint wrote:White, Simpkin and Siposs all were not able to get a senior game this season - to me that is not good enough so fair enough. Merkwzorth would be worth a rookie spot to see how things go . Saad was probably heading towards the fringe in his final year before suspension so not surprised , game has changed and doesn't work hard enough defensively to survive in the AFL now days.
Re: Guess the delistings
And no left foot which really hurts a small goal sneak.older saint wrote:White, Simpkin and Siposs all were not able to get a senior game this season - to me that is not good enough so fair enough. Merkwzorth would be worth a rookie spot to see how things go . Saad was probably heading towards the fringe in his final year before suspension so not surprised , game has changed and doesn't work hard enough defensively to survive in the AFL now days.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Guess the delistings
siposs doesn't have the work ethic hes cookedsaint6709 wrote:Siposs is the one who needs to stay he is a footballer and could still be a good one - needs to really pull out a big pre season for fitness and you would hope that by now the penny has dropped-- - I think Markworth is a pipedream - would love to be proved wrong and would like to see markworth rookied for 1 more year - but not at the expense of sipossolder saint wrote:White, Simpkin and Siposs all were not able to get a senior game this season - to me that is not good enough so fair enough. Merkwzorth would be worth a rookie spot to see how things go . Saad was probably heading towards the fringe in his final year before suspension so not surprised , game has changed and doesn't work hard enough defensively to survive in the AFL now days.
markworth has been unlucky - quick and skilled mid and we need plenty of them HES the one we need to make it.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Guess the delistings
I have no interest in spuds on our list regardless of how weak the draft is.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:In a weak draft shedding players for the sake of it seems stupid.saintspremiers wrote:Finally Siposs is gone.
I hope that list expands. We need a bit more turnover than that.
SP has no interest at all in thinking of things like that.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Guess the delistings
saintspremiers wrote:I have no interest in spuds on our list regardless of how weak the draft is.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:In a weak draft shedding players for the sake of it seems stupid.saintspremiers wrote:Finally Siposs is gone.
I hope that list expands. We need a bit more turnover than that.
SP has no interest at all in thinking of things like that.
And you have even less respect for some of our players. If they are good respect until they are no good. If they aren't good enough stuff them from the start. I can imagine what you say at the footy to some of our players.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Con Gorozidis wrote:38 is Rookie. So thats only 4 gone?
Has to be one more to come.....
why- Clubs only required to move 3- But can then re draft rookie
so 4 is average.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Guess the delistings
Get a grip buddy. Not all players make it. Many don't. I call it as I see it. No sugar coating. At least I go to more than a handful of games a year to form my opinionsplugger66 wrote:saintspremiers wrote:I have no interest in spuds on our list regardless of how weak the draft is.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:In a weak draft shedding players for the sake of it seems stupid.saintspremiers wrote:Finally Siposs is gone.
I hope that list expands. We need a bit more turnover than that.
SP has no interest at all in thinking of things like that.
And you have even less respect for some of our players. If they are good respect until they are no good. If they aren't good enough stuff them from the start. I can imagine what you say at the footy to some of our players.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Guess the delistings
saintspremiers wrote:Get a grip buddy. Not all players make it. Many don't. I call it as I see it. No sugar coating. At least I go to more than a handful of games a year to form my opinionsplugger66 wrote:saintspremiers wrote:I have no interest in spuds on our list regardless of how weak the draft is.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:In a weak draft shedding players for the sake of it seems stupid.saintspremiers wrote:Finally Siposs is gone.
I hope that list expands. We need a bit more turnover than that.
SP has no interest at all in thinking of things like that.
And you have even less respect for some of our players. If they are good respect until they are no good. If they aren't good enough stuff them from the start. I can imagine what you say at the footy to some of our players.
I know not every player makes it. Probably less than 50% but why call them spuds and hope they are delisted isn't supporting our players. And I don't even understand your last sentence. I go to every game I can. I happen to also follow another club which means I cant go the footy on Saturdays. You should try it. The problem is we don't call our players spuds and hope they are delisted so it may not suit you.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Guess the delistings
You don't get it. Ok so I shouldn't hope any players get delisted even if they are spuds.plugger66 wrote:saintspremiers wrote:Get a grip buddy. Not all players make it. Many don't. I call it as I see it. No sugar coating. At least I go to more than a handful of games a year to form my opinionsplugger66 wrote:saintspremiers wrote:I have no interest in spuds on our list regardless of how weak the draft is.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:In a weak draft shedding players for the sake of it seems stupid.saintspremiers wrote:Finally Siposs is gone.
I hope that list expands. We need a bit more turnover than that.
SP has no interest at all in thinking of things like that.
And you have even less respect for some of our players. If they are good respect until they are no good. If they aren't good enough stuff them from the start. I can imagine what you say at the footy to some of our players.
I know not every player makes it. Probably less than 50% but why call them spuds and hope they are delisted isn't supporting our players. And I don't even understand your last sentence. I go to every game I can. I happen to also follow another club which means I cant go the footy on Saturdays. You should try it. The problem is we don't call our players spuds and hope they are delisted so it may not suit you.
Yep, makes perfect sense to no one except yourself
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Guess the delistings
No I don't get the idea of calling our players spuds. How does it help you? I'm pretty sure it doesn't. And even if you hope players get delisted, no one is listening. Why not just wait and see instead of showing joy about a player getting delisted? If a player I think should be delisted isn't, I hope he proves me wrong. All you would do is complain about that player all the next season.saintspremiers wrote:
You don't get it. Ok so I shouldn't hope any players get delisted even if they are spuds.
Yep, makes perfect sense to no one except yourself
And you like saying things make sense to everyone but the poster you are speaking to. The problem with those comments is not many people seem to agree with you.