Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
terry smith rules wrote:in the second quarter when the game was still alive we had the ball in our 50 for minutes at a time
tackle after tackle, pressure act after pressure act and not one free kick
you could see the saints player just throwing their hands saying wtf, the eagles could pretty much do as they please to get rid of the ball
so yes right then the umpiring was corrupt, game on the line and nothing from them
I love Nic Nat but seriously the 360 rules seemed to turn into the 720 rule and he still wasn't pinged for holding the ball.
I'm pretty sure there is no such rule.
It's not written but some get a full rotation before they are required to dispose of the ball. Seems champion players get about a full rotation but a kid or a fringe player must have disposed immediately. If you are a WCE you just let go of the ball or throw it to a team mate.
GoSaintersGo wrote:3 effective free kicks in the field of play for the whole game plus 3 out on full free kicks gave us a total of 6 - NOW THAT IS CORRUPT UMPIRING.
I may be completely wrong - but I do not think that the Out on the full are counted in the free kick count.
It isn't but it looks impressive.
You have really taken you umpire love too far if you try to justify that game. Even the WCE supporters are saying it was crap on BF. I can just imagine you at home with your signed umpires shirt on arousing yourself to pictures of Razor Ray. You can go visit the fools in gaol in a few year.
terry smith rules wrote:in the second quarter when the game was still alive we had the ball in our 50 for minutes at a time
tackle after tackle, pressure act after pressure act and not one free kick
you could see the saints player just throwing their hands saying wtf, the eagles could pretty much do as they please to get rid of the ball
so yes right then the umpiring was corrupt, game on the line and nothing from them
I love Nic Nat but seriously the 360 rules seemed to turn into the 720 rule and he still wasn't pinged for holding the ball.
I'm pretty sure there is no such rule.
It's not written but some get a full rotation before they are required to dispose of the ball. Seems champion players get about a full rotation but a kid or a fringe player must have disposed immediately. If you are a WCE you just let go of the ball or throw it to a team mate.
Well if that is the case its an error because the rule is clear and rotation isn't in it.
GoSaintersGo wrote:3 effective free kicks in the field of play for the whole game plus 3 out on full free kicks gave us a total of 6 - NOW THAT IS CORRUPT UMPIRING.
I may be completely wrong - but I do not think that the Out on the full are counted in the free kick count.
It isn't but it looks impressive.
You have really taken you umpire love too far if you try to justify that game. Even the WCE supporters are saying it was crap on BF. I can just imagine you at home with your signed umpires shirt on arousing yourself to pictures of Razor Ray. You can go visit the fools in gaol in a few year.
GoSaintersGo wrote:3 effective free kicks in the field of play for the whole game plus 3 out on full free kicks gave us a total of 6 - NOW THAT IS CORRUPT UMPIRING.
I may be completely wrong - but I do not think that the Out on the full are counted in the free kick count.
It isn't but it looks impressive.
You have really taken you umpire love too far if you try to justify that game. Even the WCE supporters are saying it was crap on BF. I can just imagine you at home with your signed umpires shirt on arousing yourself to pictures of Razor Ray. You can go visit the fools in gaol in a few year.
Gringo again one of your made up comments when you cant think of anything else to say. Why do you lie to make a point? I haven't said even one comment to justify the game. Not one. I said OOB on the full isn't counted as a free. You do understand that is all I said?
And a great last comment about Ray and jail. Wow. Pathetic actually. Probably shows your complete lack of skills in discussing something. At least that trouble make Saynta like it. You know him. The weak poster who hasn't even got the courage to say he was previously another hated poster. You seem to want to end up the same way.
GoSaintersGo wrote:3 effective free kicks in the field of play for the whole game plus 3 out on full free kicks gave us a total of 6 - NOW THAT IS CORRUPT UMPIRING.
I may be completely wrong - but I do not think that the Out on the full are counted in the free kick count.
It isn't but it looks impressive.
You have really taken you umpire love too far if you try to justify that game. Even the WCE supporters are saying it was crap on BF. I can just imagine you at home with your signed umpires shirt on arousing yourself to pictures of Razor Ray. You can go visit the fools in gaol in a few year.
Now that is funny.
Reported for baiting. I'm sure you know what that is.
GoSaintersGo wrote:3 effective free kicks in the field of play for the whole game plus 3 out on full free kicks gave us a total of 6 - NOW THAT IS CORRUPT UMPIRING.
I may be completely wrong - but I do not think that the Out on the full are counted in the free kick count.
It isn't but it looks impressive.
You have really taken you umpire love too far if you try to justify that game. Even the WCE supporters are saying it was crap on BF. I can just imagine you at home with your signed umpires shirt on arousing yourself to pictures of Razor Ray. You can go visit the fools in gaol in a few year.
Now that is funny.
Reported for baiting. I'm sure you know what that is.
but you made a virtue out of never reporting anyone.
GoSaintersGo wrote:3 effective free kicks in the field of play for the whole game plus 3 out on full free kicks gave us a total of 6 - NOW THAT IS CORRUPT UMPIRING.
I may be completely wrong - but I do not think that the Out on the full are counted in the free kick count.
It isn't but it looks impressive.
You have really taken you umpire love too far if you try to justify that game. Even the WCE supporters are saying it was crap on BF. I can just imagine you at home with your signed umpires shirt on arousing yourself to pictures of Razor Ray. You can go visit the fools in gaol in a few year.
Now that is funny.
Reported for baiting. I'm sure you know what that is.
but you made a virtue out of never reporting anyone.
changed your tune or are you just full of s***
Of course he reports people. But your second option has merit as well.
Besides he has no idea what baiting is anyway. And the images gringo's post conjured up were funny even if gross.
saynta wrote:
Of course he reports people. But your second option has merit as well.
Besides he has no idea what baiting is anyway. And the images gringo's post conjured up were funny even if gross.
I'm sure BM is so happy to have your support. You changed your name but still haven't changed your style. Cant believe the mods thought you would. By the way I have made one report ever and it wasn't something a person said about me. I wont report you Saynta. I will let you bury yourself under a new name but the same pathetic style. If we are talking reporting apparently you are the king of reports under either name. No run off old man.
Hi Pluggsy. With 50,306 posts, I've noted that you regard yourself as the "no all" of all things football, particularly the rules and umpiring.
It appears as though you have been "floored" by the comments made in relation to the corrupt umpiring performance once again in favour of West Coast.
As the self imposed expert, where's your comments.
GoSaintersGo wrote:Hi Pluggsy. With 50,306 posts, I've noted that you regard yourself as the "no all" of all things football, particularly the rules and umpiring.
It appears as though you have been "floored" by the comments made in relation to the corrupt umpiring performance once again in favour of West Coast.
As the self imposed expert, where's your comments.
GoSaintersGo wrote:Hi Pluggsy. With 50,306 posts, I've noted that you regard yourself as the "no all" of all things football, particularly the rules and umpiring.
It appears as though you have been "floored" by the comments made in relation to the corrupt umpiring performance once again in favour of West Coast.
As the self imposed expert, where's your comments.
"No all" is spot on. As in knows nothing.
You are weak as water Stinger. You changed your name but still haven't got the guts or the ability to think of things on your own so you jump on other peoples posts. Pathetic. Even worse you jumped on a guys post who had a go at me but doesn't no what no from know or no know is. As for being floored what the hell is that guy talking about? Show me where I'm floored.
terry smith rules wrote:in the second quarter when the game was still alive we had the ball in our 50 for minutes at a time
tackle after tackle, pressure act after pressure act and not one free kick
you could see the saints player just throwing their hands saying wtf, the eagles could pretty much do as they please to get rid of the ball
so yes right then the umpiring was corrupt, game on the line and nothing from them
I love Nic Nat but seriously the 360 rules seemed to turn into the 720 rule and he still wasn't pinged for holding the ball.
He wasn't pinged even once for fending off his opponent with the knee either in centre bounces.
I couldn't believe they didn't renounce one ball that was an obvious advantage to WC either. Some went 20meters forward for them and weren't called back.
You are all wrong about the umpiring - Derek Humphrey Smith says the review of the game indicated that the WCE only got three unwarranted frees and St Kilda got one - and that a review of all the game indicated, that even with hindsight and plenty of time, the free kick count should have been 22 - 7. So that means that WCE got 3 that they should not have and missed 2 - we got one that we should not have got and missed out on 2 for the entire game.
This is not under the pressure of the game - this is in the cold hard light of day!
81 tackles - almost all of them - WCE disposed of the ball correctly - according to the umpires advisory committee.
Get used to it - NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE - If you play for St Kilda, or support them - go and buy shares in Vaseline!!!!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
Sainter_Dad wrote:You are all wrong about the umpiring - Derek Humphrey Smith says the review of the game indicated that the WCE only got three unwarranted frees and St Kilda got one - and that a review of all the game indicated, that even with hindsight and plenty of time, the free kick count should have been 22 - 7. So that means that WCE got 3 that they should not have and missed 2 - we got one that we should not have got and missed out on 2 for the entire game.
This is not under the pressure of the game - this is in the cold hard light of day!
81 tackles - almost all of them - WCE disposed of the ball correctly - according to the umpires advisory committee.
Get used to it - NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE - If you play for St Kilda, or support them - go and buy shares in Vaseline!!!!
Why would you bother watching if you feel like that? Do you like pain?
