says on an article on the saints page today that we showed interest in him along with essendon and fremantle to alow him to be selected for the draft combine.
the question i have rather than saying we should get him is can he come straight onto our list because he is only a year or so out of an afl list ie that cricket guy ppl are talking about ?
Mitch Brown?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
jimmy_slats
- Club Player
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mon 05 Nov 2007 10:54am
Re: Mitch Brown?
jimmy_slats wrote:says on an article on the saints page today that we showed interest in him along with essendon and fremantle to alow him to be selected for the draft combine.
the question i have rather than saying we should get him is can he come straight onto our list because he is only a year or so out of an afl list ie that cricket guy ppl are talking about ?
The cricket guy hasn't played any footy for 5 years, if not longer. Brown must be drafted like any other aussie rules player. There is now a very good reason we need to finish above Essendon.
-
jimmy_slats
- Club Player
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mon 05 Nov 2007 10:54am
Re: Mitch Brown?
how dose that mean we need to finish above essendon ? not a crack just asking
'WALK THIS WAY!!!!!'
Re: Mitch Brown?
jimmy_slats wrote:how dose that mean we need to finish above essendon ? not a crack just asking
If we finish above them hopefully they will pick him first.
Re: Mitch Brown?
Think not to drafting brown.
The cricket guy is Alex Keath.
The 196 centimetre Keath would be able to sign easily with the club of his choice given he has not been registered with a football club for more than three years.
He could therefore be signed as a category B rookie outside the draft with clubs able to pay him outside the salary cap until he made the senior team.
While some recruiters believe the 23-year-old has spent too much time away from football to successfully return to AFL, and are concerned by the knee problems he endured early in his time at Victoria, others believe he has enough talent to overcome that.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/a ... z3hqObRX16
The cricket guy is Alex Keath.
The 196 centimetre Keath would be able to sign easily with the club of his choice given he has not been registered with a football club for more than three years.
He could therefore be signed as a category B rookie outside the draft with clubs able to pay him outside the salary cap until he made the senior team.
While some recruiters believe the 23-year-old has spent too much time away from football to successfully return to AFL, and are concerned by the knee problems he endured early in his time at Victoria, others believe he has enough talent to overcome that.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/a ... z3hqObRX16
Re: Mitch Brown?
Bains is a Melbourne Grammar boy as well, maybe that will help us have a chat to Keath?
-
WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Mitch Brown?
Would much rather Brown than Schulz some have suggested !
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
-
remboy
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 597 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Mitch Brown?
Could be for the best. We'd be able to take Jones in that case. Apparently he's been tearing it up in the VFL this yearplugger66 wrote:jimmy_slats wrote:how dose that mean we need to finish above essendon ? not a crack just asking
If we finish above them hopefully they will pick him first.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Mitch Brown?
Its a bit easier to get mids than KPs though.remboy wrote:Could be for the best. We'd be able to take Jones in that case. Apparently he's been tearing it up in the VFL this yearplugger66 wrote:jimmy_slats wrote:how dose that mean we need to finish above essendon ? not a crack just asking
If we finish above them hopefully they will pick him first.
Re: Mitch Brown?
gringo wrote:Its a bit easier to get mids than KPs though.remboy wrote:Could be for the best. We'd be able to take Jones in that case. Apparently he's been tearing it up in the VFL this yearplugger66 wrote:jimmy_slats wrote:how dose that mean we need to finish above essendon ? not a crack just asking
If we finish above them hopefully they will pick him first.
Yep he is a KP VFL player but he isn't in the AFL. Anyway we have 2 KP VFL players on our list at the moment. Need another like a hole in the head.
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Mitch Brown?
I want him so much just to s*** you Plugster. I hope we delist some young kid with huge potential to fit him in as well and trade our first pick for Schultz.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Its a bit easier to get mids than KPs though.remboy wrote:Could be for the best. We'd be able to take Jones in that case. Apparently he's been tearing it up in the VFL this yearplugger66 wrote:jimmy_slats wrote:how dose that mean we need to finish above essendon ? not a crack just asking
If we finish above them hopefully they will pick him first.
Yep he is a KP VFL player but he isn't in the AFL. Anyway we have 2 KP VFL players on our list at the moment. Need another like a hole in the head.
-
Toy Saint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Mitch Brown?
I want him so much just to s*** you Plugster. I hope we delist some young kid with huge potential to fit him in as well and trade our first pick for Schultz.[/quote]
Scarcastic or silly?
Scarcastic or silly?
Re: Mitch Brown?
gringo wrote:
I want him so much just to s*** you Plugster. I hope we delist some young kid with huge potential to fit him in as well and trade our first pick for Schultz.
Sadly I think that is true. I want good players under the age of 24 or great players 26 and over, not guys who have had 6 years in the system and have hardly played.
-
Bunk_Moreland
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
The Recruit
- Club Player
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 118 times
Re: Mitch Brown?
Must consider for 2016
Brown would be fantastic for our developing defence.........but not at a high cost.
Brown would be fantastic for our developing defence.........but not at a high cost.
-
Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Mitch Brown?
Great Dilbert. Too close to home for meBunk_Moreland wrote:AFL spud - VFL very good.
Poor man Maister