SainterK wrote:...When did footy get so dangerously mingled with life issues?...
The day the first game was played. It was a game to be played between two opposing sides. It is a metaphor for many of the conflicts between humans. As such, it is a measure of how far humans have come. Rather than choosing sides and actually killing people, a game is played and we go home after it relatively unscathed.
I have witnessed much racism from crowds over the years. After Nicky Winmar lifted his jumper, after years of taunts and race hate comments from the crowd (and some players), he was even more mercilessly targeted by some in the media at the time, like Sam Newman, who made exactly the same ignorant comments that his made about Adam Goodes. Newman even blacked his face to poke fun at Nicky on one occasion. The fact that a creep like Newman can still command TV time is an indictment on those who employ him - money trumps ethics. People forget that targeting players with comments on the field was very common up until just a decade or so ago. "Part of the game" idiots like Newman, Shaw and Carey would say. It took brave men to stand up and be counted and many suffered because of it, particularly from the redneck media. But that battle was finally won, not least of all because of players like Nick Riewoldt, who has never subscribed to the "part of the game" rubbish. Players now respect each other as professionals but play the game just as hard as ever. Racism wasn't such an essential part of the game after all.
What would you do, if in round 22, you were near or next to someone who made a racist comment about Adam Goodes? Would it be different is they made a racist comment about Shane Savage? I'm sure you have an opinion about that. The question is not whether you have an a opinion (everyone has them), but what you are prepared to do about it should the situation arise (it's always easier to do nothing or look the other way).