Very, very harsh.plugger66 wrote:Austinnn wrote:I think that the job of the CEO of a professional sports club in a powerful league is far different to that of a football player playing 22 matches a year. I would prefer Finnis be smart rather than just a bull at a gate. So far, based on results, he's not the best we've had since I've been following the Saints, which is about 18 years.
Harsh Austinn.
Just a dirty day in the office
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1215 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
I think the "not" is a typotony74 wrote:Very, very harsh.plugger66 wrote:Austinnn wrote:I think that the job of the CEO of a professional sports club in a powerful league is far different to that of a football player playing 22 matches a year. I would prefer Finnis be smart rather than just a bull at a gate. So far, based on results, he's not the best we've had since I've been following the Saints, which is about 18 years.
Harsh Austinn.
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
#gosaintas wrote:I think the "not" is a typotony74 wrote:Very, very harsh.plugger66 wrote:Austinnn wrote:I think that the job of the CEO of a professional sports club in a powerful league is far different to that of a football player playing 22 matches a year. I would prefer Finnis be smart rather than just a bull at a gate. So far, based on results, he's not the best we've had since I've been following the Saints, which is about 18 years.
Harsh Austinn.
Yep I know that. Austinn is usually pretty positive and I know he likes Finnis.
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
I was at the game and the conditions were close to impossible.
Firstly, it's a funny shaped ground, long with hardly any pockets (like Kardinia Park), then there was a gale that swirled around inside the stadium for most of the match and the surface was spongy in areas.
As soon as I walked in I thought we'd be up against it. GWS knew the ground & trained on it, so they always had a huge advantage. I even thought to myself that maybe the shape of the ground was a Sheedy Conspiracy, but dismissed that theory as surely the ground was designed by others. At half time a local asked me what I thought about their little stadium. I commented on the grounds unusual dimensions, to which he replied "Yeah, Sheedy had it designed that way, exactly like Geelong's".
It appears Sheedy did indeed conspire to give them a significant home ground advantage! As they rise, they'll be near impossible to beat there.
Players weren't holding marks, because the ball would deviate in the wind a few feet from their hands, long kicking was difficult and the only player on the ground unaffected by all this was Jeremy Cameron and he was the difference between the sides at half time. After half time we had obviously worked out how to play the ground and wind and hence our domination for the next 35-40 minutes. Unfortunately, we were wasteful when dominating and then gifted GWS their first goal in 40 minutes.
It was hardly a shocker, I left the game pleased because we will be contenders along with GWS in the (nearer than you think) future and we have nothing to fear from them. Despite all their draft concessions, we match up nicely.
Firstly, it's a funny shaped ground, long with hardly any pockets (like Kardinia Park), then there was a gale that swirled around inside the stadium for most of the match and the surface was spongy in areas.
As soon as I walked in I thought we'd be up against it. GWS knew the ground & trained on it, so they always had a huge advantage. I even thought to myself that maybe the shape of the ground was a Sheedy Conspiracy, but dismissed that theory as surely the ground was designed by others. At half time a local asked me what I thought about their little stadium. I commented on the grounds unusual dimensions, to which he replied "Yeah, Sheedy had it designed that way, exactly like Geelong's".
It appears Sheedy did indeed conspire to give them a significant home ground advantage! As they rise, they'll be near impossible to beat there.
Players weren't holding marks, because the ball would deviate in the wind a few feet from their hands, long kicking was difficult and the only player on the ground unaffected by all this was Jeremy Cameron and he was the difference between the sides at half time. After half time we had obviously worked out how to play the ground and wind and hence our domination for the next 35-40 minutes. Unfortunately, we were wasteful when dominating and then gifted GWS their first goal in 40 minutes.
It was hardly a shocker, I left the game pleased because we will be contenders along with GWS in the (nearer than you think) future and we have nothing to fear from them. Despite all their draft concessions, we match up nicely.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
insightful post...a brief break from the slanging and one upmanship going on here atm.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
I was also there and concur - had my 10 year old and we had to change seats to the other side of the ground to get out of the windLinton Lodger wrote:I was at the game and the conditions were close to impossible.
Firstly, it's a funny shaped ground, long with hardly any pockets (like Kardinia Park), then there was a gale that swirled around inside the stadium for most of the match and the surface was spongy in areas.
As soon as I walked in I thought we'd be up against it. GWS knew the ground & trained on it, so they always had a huge advantage. I even thought to myself that maybe the shape of the ground was a Sheedy Conspiracy, but dismissed that theory as surely the ground was designed by others. At half time a local asked me what I thought about their little stadium. I commented on the grounds unusual dimensions, to which he replied "Yeah, Sheedy had it designed that way, exactly like Geelong's".
It appears Sheedy did indeed conspire to give them a significant home ground advantage! As they rise, they'll be near impossible to beat there.
Players weren't holding marks, because the ball would deviate in the wind a few feet from their hands, long kicking was difficult and the only player on the ground unaffected by all this was Jeremy Cameron and he was the difference between the sides at half time. After half time we had obviously worked out how to play the ground and wind and hence our domination for the next 35-40 minutes. Unfortunately, we were wasteful when dominating and then gifted GWS their first goal in 40 minutes.
It was hardly a shocker, I left the game pleased because we will be contenders along with GWS in the (nearer than you think) future and we have nothing to fear from them. Despite all their draft concessions, we match up nicely.
What I would add was that we won the toss - but not knowing the ground (???) seemed to choose the wrong way to kick and put us at disadvantage from the get go ..
The other thing was whoever looks after boot choice seemed to misread the ground ( it looked in very good Nic) as our guys slipped over at virtually every contest whilst Gws blokes seemed not to be having any trouble keeping their feet -- we seemed to sort that out in the second half
All in all a dirty day
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5412
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
tony74 wrote:Very, very harsh.plugger66 wrote:Austinnn wrote:I think that the job of the CEO of a professional sports club in a powerful league is far different to that of a football player playing 22 matches a year. I would prefer Finnis be smart rather than just a bull at a gate. So far, based on results, he's not the best we've had since I've been following the Saints, which is about 18 years.
Harsh Austinn.
very harsh/ i think he has been great fhe saints.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
If you won't answer ridiculous questions how bout doing us all a favour and stopping with the ridiculous posts?SaintPav wrote:I don't answer ridiculous questions Teflon.Teflon wrote:oh for the love of god....SaintPav wrote:Teflon wrote:I think it's time you go check "poo poo" again cause you talking itSaintPav wrote:Great win by the Giants.
I'm so happy for the AFL, GWS and their 261 supporters.
Oh yeah, happy for Teflon too.
Yippee!
But whatever makes you happy I guess!
Not as bad as us you saying winning games now won't make a difference to the club, you tanker denier.
do tell us all Einstein how the win last week over a deplorable Essendon will help us in 5 years im all ears waiting for your statistical brilliance.
Stick to poo for all our our sake.
Stop denying what you would prefer the club to do.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
Some utter rubbish right there... consistent though I must confess...Austinnn wrote:I think that the job of the CEO of a professional sports club in a powerful league is far different to that of a football player playing 22 matches a year. I would prefer Finnis be smart rather than just a bull at a gate. So far, based on results, he's not the best we've had since I've been following the Saints, which is about 18 years.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
The coldest day I ever experienced at the footy was against Essendon in about 83 I think.plugger66 wrote:SinCitySainter wrote:Are you old enough to remember the days at Windy Hill or out at Waverley because they were truly horrendous experiences.saynta wrote:First time at that ground for me. Blowing a f****** freezing gale right into my face. Miserable day all around, and that's certainly the coldest I have ever been at the footy.SaintPav wrote:Great win by the Giants.
I'm so happy for the AFL, GWS and their 261 supporters.
Oh yeah, happy for Teflon too.
Yippee!
Surely the day at Waverley when it hailed against the Bears was the coldest day ever at the footy. Well it was for me anyway.
Windy Hill aptly named, horizontal torrential rain and we were on the end of an absolute rodgering.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
Dreadful ground, and that wind was freezing as well as blowing a gale. There had been a thunder storm the night before so the ground was always going to be slippery.No excuse for the players falling over all the time as they should have been all wearing screw-ins and not moulded souls.Linton Lodger wrote:I was at the game and the conditions were close to impossible.
Firstly, it's a funny shaped ground, long with hardly any pockets (like Kardinia Park), then there was a gale that swirled around inside the stadium for most of the match and the surface was spongy in areas.
As soon as I walked in I thought we'd be up against it. GWS knew the ground & trained on it, so they always had a huge advantage. I even thought to myself that maybe the shape of the ground was a Sheedy Conspiracy, but dismissed that theory as surely the ground was designed by others. At half time a local asked me what I thought about their little stadium. I commented on the grounds unusual dimensions, to which he replied "Yeah, Sheedy had it designed that way, exactly like Geelong's".
It appears Sheedy did indeed conspire to give them a significant home ground advantage! As they rise, they'll be near impossible to beat there.
Players weren't holding marks, because the ball would deviate in the wind a few feet from their hands, long kicking was difficult and the only player on the ground unaffected by all this was Jeremy Cameron and he was the difference between the sides at half time. After half time we had obviously worked out how to play the ground and wind and hence our domination for the next 35-40 minutes. Unfortunately, we were wasteful when dominating and then gifted GWS their first goal in 40 minutes.
It was hardly a shocker, I left the game pleased because we will be contenders along with GWS in the (nearer than you think) future and we have nothing to fear from them. Despite all their draft concessions, we match up nicely.
The Gaints may well train on the ground at times but it is not the ground where they normally train or where their training facilities are. That ground is on the other side of ANZ stadium near the swimming pool. The ground they play their games on is really the showgrounds stadium and has been there for a long time. There was a bit of redevelopment when the AFL sunk their millions into the ground but I very much doubt that Sheedy was able to turn it into the same size as Pussy Park, unless the dimensions were pretty much the same in the first place.
Those redevelopments took place in 2012 . Cost $65 million Grounds dimensions are 164 metres x 127.5 metres. Skill Stadium is 170 metres x 115. A lot longer and much skinnier
Ethiad on the other hand is much closer to Spotless at 159.5 metres x 128.8 metres.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri 10 Jul 2015 4:47am
- Location: Toowong Private, Ward 66.
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
It won't stick.Teflon wrote:Some utter rubbish right there... consistent though I must confess...Austinnn wrote:I think that the job of the CEO of a professional sports club in a powerful league is far different to that of a football player playing 22 matches a year. I would prefer Finnis be smart rather than just a bull at a gate. So far, based on results, he's not the best we've had since I've been following the Saints, which is about 18 years.
Cute but psycho. Things even out.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
If the day was anything like Melbourne weather it's hard to get a handle on. I umpired my kids footy match and it was so cold I couldn't use my hands to sign the match forms at half time. I had to stick my hand in my armpit for a couple of minutes to get the feeling back. I hurt to run even. I wouldn't have performed well in that kind of environment. Especially with the hothouse Etihad softening us up.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
Com on Teflon, be nice and don't have a blue maaate...lolTeflon wrote:If you won't answer ridiculous questions how bout doing us all a favour and stopping with the ridiculous posts?SaintPav wrote:I don't answer ridiculous questions Teflon.Teflon wrote:oh for the love of god....SaintPav wrote:Teflon wrote:I think it's time you go check "poo poo" again cause you talking itSaintPav wrote:Great win by the Giants.
I'm so happy for the AFL, GWS and their 261 supporters.
Oh yeah, happy for Teflon too.
Yippee!
But whatever makes you happy I guess!
Not as bad as us you saying winning games now won't make a difference to the club, you tanker denier.
do tell us all Einstein how the win last week over a deplorable Essendon will help us in 5 years im all ears waiting for your statistical brilliance.
Stick to poo for all our our sake.
Stop denying what you would prefer the club to do.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Just a dirty day in the office
No problem, since you asked so nicely !!SaintPav wrote:Com on Teflon, be nice and don't have a blue maaate...lolTeflon wrote:If you won't answer ridiculous questions how bout doing us all a favour and stopping with the ridiculous posts?SaintPav wrote:I don't answer ridiculous questions Teflon.Teflon wrote:oh for the love of god....SaintPav wrote:Teflon wrote:I think it's time you go check "poo poo" again cause you talking itSaintPav wrote:Great win by the Giants.
I'm so happy for the AFL, GWS and their 261 supporters.
Oh yeah, happy for Teflon too.
Yippee!
But whatever makes you happy I guess!
Not as bad as us you saying winning games now won't make a difference to the club, you tanker denier.
do tell us all Einstein how the win last week over a deplorable Essendon will help us in 5 years im all ears waiting for your statistical brilliance.
Stick to poo for all our our sake.
Stop denying what you would prefer the club to do.
“Yeah….nah””