Match thread v Giants

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Grimfang
Club Player
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:30am
Location: Tecoma, Vic.
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563450Post Grimfang »

Series of about 15 possible free kicks against GWS in that passage of play in their forward 50, not one paid.


Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons; for you are a quick and tasty morsel.
ROLS-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563451Post ROLS-LEE »

Just way to casual today. The non Shepard by Webster was pretty ordinary. Nothing going right today.


kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563452Post kalsaint »

mullet wrote:following this thread and not one mention of our comeback.

Probably cause we play 5 minutes of flowing footy that scored 3 goals then licking to forwards became an issue again with wasted opportunities.

The same old line will be run about lost opportunity, not hard at it in the first half, Shaw comprehensively has out muscled Lonie and ultimately delivery continues to be poor to the forwards.
Never going to win any finals if we cant lick straight to players when clear. This bugs me more than anything as we lost 2 consecutive GF's probably for the same reason.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
ROLS-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563453Post ROLS-LEE »

Sub also should be a runner. Were are you Faz.


User avatar
Grimfang
Club Player
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:30am
Location: Tecoma, Vic.
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563454Post Grimfang »

Piss weak effort from Webster. Failed to protect the ball carrier.


Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons; for you are a quick and tasty morsel.
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563457Post kalsaint »

Grimfang wrote:Piss weak effort from Webster. Failed to protect the ball carrier.
Oh so true. If the ball carrier isn't protected expect a turnover given our kicking skills.

Webster made a few mistakes today. One terrible kick to give away an easy goal.

We need to be sure that we have the right team for the opposition of the day. I don't think we got this right and the effort was issue early but small guys get tired, bigger guys don't get shorter. We suffered from the former today.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563458Post kalsaint »

Grimfang wrote:Piss weak effort from Webster. Failed to protect the ball carrier.
Oh so true. If the ball carrier isn't protected expect a turnover given our kicking skills.

Webster made a few mistakes today. One terrible kick to give away an easy goal.

We need to be sure that we have the right team for the opposition of the day. I don't think we got this right and the effort was issue early but small guys get tired, bigger guys don't get shorter. We suffered from the former today.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6612
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1341 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563473Post Jacks Back »

Not good saints.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563483Post kalsaint »

Listening to the SEN commentators dribble on and they mentioned the sloppy kicking and putting to the fact we have a young side. Last week was good, free space and no pressure means time is given for kicking.

Today, pressure builds and players need protection when they have the ball so time is not so critical to get a good delivery. Unfortunately we miss the simple kicks when there is perceived pressure.

Other teams have the same issue but not as much as we do in this regard. Don't we have the discipline for protection or the senior bodies to deliver this protection? Why do other clubs not have the same issue to the same extent? It baffles me as the kicking issue has been around for up to 9 years now.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13331
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 682 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563486Post The Fireman »

The poor umpiring against us didn't help but GWS were too good. They are and will be a very good side. We aren't that far behind them. Some good picks this year and we are set ready to go.


stjay
Club Player
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 2:50pm

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563489Post stjay »

Gilbert 150 games - Disposals 13, efficiency 38.5%.
Hmmmm......


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563494Post Con Gorozidis »

stjay wrote:Gilbert 150 games - Disposals 13, efficiency 38.5%.
Hmmmm......
Pretty match standard stuff. No surprises.

Remember when posters were saying how he ws an AFL great and 'people how forget how good he is' and 'he really adds a lot down back ' etc etc etc. No i never forgot what Gilbert gives us. Flashes of brilliance but mainly loads of turnovers and poor decisions. Has been exactly the same for 4 years now.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563496Post gringo »

kalsaint wrote:Listening to the SEN commentators dribble on and they mentioned the sloppy kicking and putting to the fact we have a young side. Last week was good, free space and no pressure means time is given for kicking.

Today, pressure builds and players need protection when they have the ball so time is not so critical to get a good delivery. Unfortunately we miss the simple kicks when there is perceived pressure.

Other teams have the same issue but not as much as we do in this regard. Don't we have the discipline for protection or the senior bodies to deliver this protection? Why do other clubs not have the same issue to the same extent? It baffles me as the kicking issue has been around for up to 9 years now.

I think you just notice when its your own team. My Tigers and Demons mates are always saying the same thing. Even my Hawks mates complain about their disposal efficiency.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563497Post bigcarl »

The Fireman wrote:The poor umpiring against us didn't help but GWS were too good. They are and will be a very good side. We aren't that far behind them. Some good picks this year and we are set ready to go.

this


stjay
Club Player
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 2:50pm

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563504Post stjay »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
stjay wrote:Gilbert 150 games - Disposals 13, efficiency 38.5%.
Hmmmm......
Pretty match standard stuff. No surprises.

Remember when posters were saying how he ws an AFL great and 'people how forget how good he is' and 'he really adds a lot down back ' etc etc etc. No i never forgot what Gilbert gives us. Flashes of brilliance but mainly loads of turnovers and poor decisions. Has been exactly the same for 4 years now.
Yep, no different. It's hard to drive high standards when you've got senior players turning in that sort of a display.
If it was a young kid doing it you could understand but we are out of excuses with this guy.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563506Post Con Gorozidis »

Reality check today. At Round 15 the ladder doesn't lie and that was 8th v 13th.
It is what it is. That's where we are at. We still lack some polish and class in the midfield.


kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563507Post kalsaint »

gringo wrote:
kalsaint wrote:Listening to the SEN commentators dribble on and they mentioned the sloppy kicking and putting to the fact we have a young side. Last week was good, free space and no pressure means time is given for kicking.

Today, pressure builds and players need protection when they have the ball so time is not so critical to get a good delivery. Unfortunately we miss the simple kicks when there is perceived pressure.

Other teams have the same issue but not as much as we do in this regard. Don't we have the discipline for protection or the senior bodies to deliver this protection? Why do other clubs not have the same issue to the same extent? It baffles me as the kicking issue has been around for up to 9 years now.

I think you just notice when its your own team. My Tigers and Demons mates are always saying the same thing. Even my Hawks mates complain about their disposal efficiency.
You are probably partly right but I note when other teams protect their players. Collingwood did a great job of this against Hawthorn last week and a fair job against Port this week. The players concerned were also generally younger team players, being from last 2 years drafts and being defenders as well.

Richmond against the Swans and Against the Giants in that last quarter last week. Player protection was the reason the team got free on both games. The difference to the Saints was that the kicking forward was so much better.

I don't rate last weeks game against the Dons in this regard due to the lack of opposition pressure. We still have a long way to go with the basics of creation and forward kicking before we become consistently competitive.

Can also add the poor kicking against Adelaide and West Coast. We turned it over so many times by licking directly to opposition players. When those 2 team got free they protected their players and scored massively with percentage.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563518Post kalsaint »

Hawthorn Freo half time commentary on AFL site is reading much like the Giants / Saints game. Although Freo got I50's in the second term with similar efficiency to goal!


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
User avatar
Austinnn
Club Player
Posts: 1533
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:02pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563580Post Austinnn »

If this weekend has taught me anything, its that I should never be a tipster or a gambler: I would have got 2/9 for this round.


Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------

You'll Never Walk Alone
saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Match thread v Giants

Post: # 1563584Post saint6709 »

ROLS-LEE wrote:Need to change shoes. How many times are we falling over
Was at the game - the first half was ridiculous our falling over and fumbling


Post Reply