No , not this true saints supporter.I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would.
Certainly not.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
No , not this true saints supporter.I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would.
By open minded you mean empty right?SaintPav wrote:I suppose tanking and fraud are virtues as well!Teflon wrote:Yes, actually but that's a different topicSaintPav wrote:That's interesting.Teflon wrote:I'm of the firm view being dogmatic is a Christian virtue.... hang with me brother I have much to teach youSaintPav wrote:SaintPav wrote:
You're dogmatic, I'll give you that.LOL...I wasn't going to say anything, but...Teflon wrote:
Thanks
Next stop: courage and conviction....
Are cheating and dishonesty Christian virtues too?
I align to the Marx bros theory "these are my principles, if you don't like them....... I have others!!"
You Christian Pav?
Still no ideas from you on how we can bring top line talent into the club other than finish 9th...
I prefer open mindedness than intolerant dogma and ideology.
Pick no 4 is better than pick 5.
Go hard in the draft.
You're a profound poster, Teflon.
lol.
WindSister wrote:No , not this true saints supporter.I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would.
Certainly not.
Could finishing 9th simply mean our older players performed above and beyond and we had a good run?plugger66 wrote:Teflon wrote:No the difference is many on here won't say itplugger66 wrote:Teflon wrote:Just add to that.... Pick inside top 5.... And I'm with yousaintspremiers wrote:I'll also be happy with 6 wins percentage in the 80's and whatever picks we end up withTeflon wrote:Has a nice ring to it con.....Con Gorozidis wrote:I will be happy with 6 wins, a % above 80 and 4th pick in the draft.
Nice balance .
Look I'm not greedy but I'm thinking we desperately need some mid guns - this years draft supposedly has some...
Having picks like Riewoldt (1), Kosi (2), Ball (2?), X Clarke (5), Goddard (1 ...thanks Blues) certainly didn't hurt our last decade that's what I'm after .... We haven't got anywhere near that talent yet and I think we are going to need to if we are to challenge GWS and co in future
Draft hard time folks
The difference is neither of those 2 people are hoping we will lose games. They just think we will win about 6 games. Seems about the right number based on form and who we play. If we won our last 12 I don't think either person would be upset. You would be though because you want us to get the best possible pick and that means losing our last 12.
I will
To win long term we'll need to drop a few and that's ok
Man up, take the pain now with a view to bigger things later
OR
Are you advocating we finish 9th?? Is that what you want?
And when our ageing stars (playing good footy now but gone in 3 years go)
You'll be happy to see us plummet again??
Grow a pair and answer this
Are you happy for us to finish 9th this year??
I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would. It would mean winning around 9 of our last 12. Considering the fixture that would mean beating some very good sides. It would show the rebuild has well and truly started. It isn't going to happen though. We may win 3 at the most. The other option apart from trying to win every game is to lose every game or lose most but win some random game because it means something to you. That's weird in itself. The problem with winning some random game is goes against what you have said about 50 times that the system rewards you the lower you finish so at the moment winning isn't important. Of course unless its some random game that suits Teffers. And you have also said we need to finish as low as possible next year. What happens in 2017. Do you think we suddenly go from 16th to 6th. It wont happen. We will still finish in the bottom 6. You really must have been pissed off when we won a few late in 2003. We got a worse draft pick. But it did lead to winning our first 10 in 2004. Players got confidence. You would have wanted draft picks.
As for the personal stuff when did I say I want you to apologise. I said it shows how weak either you are or your argument. Very weak matter of fact. This thread also shows the inconsistency of moderating but that's another story.
Maybe they aren't delusional about where we are at?plugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:No , not this true saints supporter.I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would.
Certainly not.
You honestly wouldn't want to win 9 of our last 12? What is wrong with supporters. Hoping for some magical cure by losing.
Teflon wrote:Maybe they aren't delusional about where we are at?plugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:No , not this true saints supporter.I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would.
Certainly not.
You honestly wouldn't want to win 9 of our last 12? What is wrong with supporters. Hoping for some magical cure by losing.
Maybe their Sunday's are good?
Teflon wrote:Could finishing 9th simply mean our older players performed above and beyond and we had a good run?plugger66 wrote:Teflon wrote:No the difference is many on here won't say itplugger66 wrote:Teflon wrote:Just add to that.... Pick inside top 5.... And I'm with yousaintspremiers wrote:I'll also be happy with 6 wins percentage in the 80's and whatever picks we end up withTeflon wrote:Has a nice ring to it con.....Con Gorozidis wrote:I will be happy with 6 wins, a % above 80 and 4th pick in the draft.
Nice balance .
Look I'm not greedy but I'm thinking we desperately need some mid guns - this years draft supposedly has some...
Having picks like Riewoldt (1), Kosi (2), Ball (2?), X Clarke (5), Goddard (1 ...thanks Blues) certainly didn't hurt our last decade that's what I'm after .... We haven't got anywhere near that talent yet and I think we are going to need to if we are to challenge GWS and co in future
Draft hard time folks
The difference is neither of those 2 people are hoping we will lose games. They just think we will win about 6 games. Seems about the right number based on form and who we play. If we won our last 12 I don't think either person would be upset. You would be though because you want us to get the best possible pick and that means losing our last 12.
I will
To win long term we'll need to drop a few and that's ok
Man up, take the pain now with a view to bigger things later
OR
Are you advocating we finish 9th?? Is that what you want?
And when our ageing stars (playing good footy now but gone in 3 years go)
You'll be happy to see us plummet again??
Grow a pair and answer this
Are you happy for us to finish 9th this year??
I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would. It would mean winning around 9 of our last 12. Considering the fixture that would mean beating some very good sides. It would show the rebuild has well and truly started. It isn't going to happen though. We may win 3 at the most. The other option apart from trying to win every game is to lose every game or lose most but win some random game because it means something to you. That's weird in itself. The problem with winning some random game is goes against what you have said about 50 times that the system rewards you the lower you finish so at the moment winning isn't important. Of course unless its some random game that suits Teffers. And you have also said we need to finish as low as possible next year. What happens in 2017. Do you think we suddenly go from 16th to 6th. It wont happen. We will still finish in the bottom 6. You really must have been pissed off when we won a few late in 2003. We got a worse draft pick. But it did lead to winning our first 10 in 2004. Players got confidence. You would have wanted draft picks.
As for the personal stuff when did I say I want you to apologise. I said it shows how weak either you are or your argument. Very weak matter of fact. This thread also shows the inconsistency of moderating but that's another story.
What happens when they go - back to the bottom?
Lay off the mods - it's not easy with your constant baiting
WindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?
If the club made 9th it would be largely on the back of stellar performances from ageing stars who in 3 years will be gone/on 1 leg before we once again head for the bottomplugger66 wrote:Teflon wrote:Maybe they aren't delusional about where we are at?plugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:No , not this true saints supporter.I would love to finish 9th this year. Surely every true saints supporter would.
Certainly not.
You honestly wouldn't want to win 9 of our last 12? What is wrong with supporters. Hoping for some magical cure by losing.
Maybe their Sunday's are good?
I know where we are at. That wasn't your question but that wouldn't be unusual for you to not even understand what you asked. If we won 9 of our last 12 how do you think the club would be travelling?
I'd take certain wins over others for sureplugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?
It makes no sense. Its clear it makes no sense. So like Teffers you want the best draft position possible so I gather you are happy to lose all the games as well or do you want to win some random games for no particular reason?
No but you want the best pick possible and anyone who deals in common sense then realises to get the best pick possible you have to lose every game for the rest of the season. You then tell us you want to win random games for no particular reason other than you don't like the side or some other silly reason. Message to Teffers, who cares who you don't like. Pretty sure I didn't call him a non supporter but you do have a way of fibbing to sound emotive. I want to win the flag. You mentioned 9th and I said that would be a good result. There you go. All emotive again. And what does go Tiges even mean? We play Melbourne this week. Im sure you will come with some reason you said go Tiges though. Logic and Teffers. Black and White. Plugger and Arnol. Navratalova and Sharapova.Teflon wrote:I'd take certain wins over others for sureplugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?
It makes no sense. Its clear it makes no sense. So like Teffers you want the best draft position possible so I gather you are happy to lose all the games as well or do you want to win some random games for no particular reason?
And I thought you admitted I hadn't said lose all games??
Which is it ?
Anyway, WS has a view he is entitled to it like CW is without being labelled non supporters etc by a hysterical mob who can't separate emotion from logic
I respect your view - you want us to finish 9th ... Fair enough
Go Tiges !!
But you had already agreed earlier that I'm not suggesting lose every game?plugger66 wrote:No but you want the best pick possible and anyone who deals in common sense then realises to get the best pick possible you have to lose every game for the rest of the season. You then tell us you want to win random games for no particular reason other than you don't like the side or some other silly reason. Message to Teffers, who cares who you don't like. Pretty sure I didn't call him a non supporter but you do have a way of fibbing to sound emotive. I want to win the flag. You mentioned 9th and I said that would be a good result. There you go. All emotive again. And what does go Tiges even mean? We play Melbourne this week. Im sure you will come with some reason you said go Tiges though. Logic and Teffers. Black and White. Plugger and Arnol. Navratalova and Sharapova.Teflon wrote:I'd take certain wins over others for sureplugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?
It makes no sense. Its clear it makes no sense. So like Teffers you want the best draft position possible so I gather you are happy to lose all the games as well or do you want to win some random games for no particular reason?
And I thought you admitted I hadn't said lose all games??
Which is it ?
Anyway, WS has a view he is entitled to it like CW is without being labelled non supporters etc by a hysterical mob who can't separate emotion from logic
I respect your view - you want us to finish 9th ... Fair enough
Go Tiges !!
Spot on WS - no 9th for me eitherWindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?
Hands Up Who Wants Us to Finish 9thTeflon wrote:Let's Make this thread easy
Hands up all those posters who want Saints to finish 9th this year: please put your names below...
3. AustinnnTeflon wrote:Hands Up Who Wants Us to Finish 9thTeflon wrote:Let's Make this thread easy
Hands up all those posters who want Saints to finish 9th this year: please put your names below...
Names below please
1. Pluggs
2. Bunk
Teflon wrote:But you had already agreed earlier that I'm not suggesting lose every game?plugger66 wrote:No but you want the best pick possible and anyone who deals in common sense then realises to get the best pick possible you have to lose every game for the rest of the season. You then tell us you want to win random games for no particular reason other than you don't like the side or some other silly reason. Message to Teffers, who cares who you don't like. Pretty sure I didn't call him a non supporter but you do have a way of fibbing to sound emotive. I want to win the flag. You mentioned 9th and I said that would be a good result. There you go. All emotive again. And what does go Tiges even mean? We play Melbourne this week. Im sure you will come with some reason you said go Tiges though. Logic and Teffers. Black and White. Plugger and Arnol. Navratalova and Sharapova.Teflon wrote:I'd take certain wins over others for sureplugger66 wrote:WindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?
It makes no sense. Its clear it makes no sense. So like Teffers you want the best draft position possible so I gather you are happy to lose all the games as well or do you want to win some random games for no particular reason?
And I thought you admitted I hadn't said lose all games??
Which is it ?
Anyway, WS has a view he is entitled to it like CW is without being labelled non supporters etc by a hysterical mob who can't separate emotion from logic
I respect your view - you want us to finish 9th ... Fair enough
Go Tiges !!
Why can't the best possible pick for us be top 5 or sub top 5 without losing every remaining game? Is that not possible at all is that what you're now saying??
Again, logic isn't your strong suit
We all get it - you want us to finish 9th so you can have your false dawn that we are just about to explode into top 4 contention and win a flag.... by finishing 9th??
Message to plugs: your delusional, short sighted and really just a little selfish ...you want to win now so you can have your good Sunday night....
No wonder we have 1 flag in 100 plus years....
Go Swannies!! Go Cats!!Teflon wrote:Go Tiges !!
Have they a history of middle of the road 9th placed finishes?Austinnn wrote:Go Swannies!! Go Cats!!Teflon wrote:Go Tiges !!
3. TeflonAustinnn wrote:3. AustinnnTeflon wrote:Hands Up Who Wants Us to Finish 9thTeflon wrote:Let's Make this thread easy
Hands up all those posters who want Saints to finish 9th this year: please put your names below...
Names below please
1. Pluggs
2. Bunk
It's only fair to present the reality of what you're proposing though, so a second question:
Hands Up Who Would Prefer 16th/17th Place to 9th place
Names below please
1. Teflon
2. Wind Sister
+ 1Teflon wrote:Spot on WS - no 9th for me eitherWindSister wrote:more interested in a 2nd Flag thanx
'n the commonsense approach to drafting & trading thats gunna get us there.
...though thats been openly expressed by me well before this 20 page circle jerk.
So , thats a NO.
No 9th for me.
Clear enough ?