Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Fair call.longtimesaint wrote:Lee may be an option but I am not sure this is the best game to try him as a defender in the seniors.Con Gorozidis wrote:The short term solution is give Lee a chance.
He would be 2 cm shorter and 10 kg lighter tnan Josh Kennedy who is the most imposing forward in the league.
It's a selection furfy Dempster won't play full back.#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Agree and players dont really play in one position these days so there will be some kind of rotation happening.longtimesaint wrote:It's a selection furfy Dempster won't play full back.#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
The only one who could play there is Fisher.
#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Con Gorozidis wrote:http://www.saints.com.au/news/2015-05-2 ... west-coast
Obviously we should have brought in Goddard or Lee, or both and left Membrey out. We would then have some options in case Kennedy get's off the leash.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Im unsure you have come up with an answer but I know if he kicks a few you will claim it. If he doesn't you will be at the local parlour getting a massage.
#gosaintas wrote:Obviously we should have brought in Goddard or Lee, or both and left Membrey out. We would then have some options in case Kennedy get's off the leash.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Im unsure you have come up with an answer but I know if he kicks a few you will claim it. If he doesn't you will be at the local parlour getting a massage.
Dumb at the selection table. And before claim "but goddard didn't play last week"...who cares.
As for going to the massage parlour - classy.
I am still not 100% sure what the massage parlour reference means, but I have to admit I found it funny anyway#gosaintas wrote:Obviously we should have brought in Goddard or Lee, or both and left Membrey out. We would then have some options in case Kennedy get's off the leash.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Im unsure you have come up with an answer but I know if he kicks a few you will claim it. If he doesn't you will be at the local parlour getting a massage.
Dumb at the selection table. And before claim "but goddard didn't play last week"...who cares.
As for going to the massage parlour - classy.
Where did I say Goddard matches up on Kennedy? Obviously Fisher gets first crack, Goddard gets second tall and Dempster plays 3rd backman. Lee plays fwd instead of Membrey. Could even play Goddard fwd and Lee back. Point is, if Kennedy gets off the leash then we would have some options. As it is, we have none. It's Fisher or bust. Your view on this is plain dumb. We lose Roo and Delaney and replace them with nobody. The team as selected is structurally wrong.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Obviously we should have brought in Goddard or Lee, or both and left Membrey out. We would then have some options in case Kennedy get's off the leash.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Im unsure you have come up with an answer but I know if he kicks a few you will claim it. If he doesn't you will be at the local parlour getting a massage.
Dumb at the selection table. And before claim "but goddard didn't play last week"...who cares.
As for going to the massage parlour - classy.
Firstly what the hell is wrong with a massage? They are everywhere now. Don't see anything unclassy about that and secondly Goddard coming in to play on Kennedy would be plain dumb. And some have said that Lee doesn't even play on the real talls at sandy. You should know that as you claim you actually see Sandy. I have seen no proof from what you write though to say that is true.
#gosaintas wrote:Where did I say Goddard matches up on Kennedy? Obviously Fisher gets first crack, Goddard gets second tall and Dempster plays 3rd backman. Lee plays fwd instead of Membrey. Could even play Goddard fwd and Lee back. Point is, if Kennedy gets off the leash then we would have some options. As it is, we have none. It's Fisher or bust. Your view on this is plain dumb. We lose Roo and Delaney and replace them with nobody. The team as selected is structurally wrong.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Obviously we should have brought in Goddard or Lee, or both and left Membrey out. We would then have some options in case Kennedy get's off the leash.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Im unsure you have come up with an answer but I know if he kicks a few you will claim it. If he doesn't you will be at the local parlour getting a massage.
Dumb at the selection table. And before claim "but goddard didn't play last week"...who cares.
As for going to the massage parlour - classy.
Firstly what the hell is wrong with a massage? They are everywhere now. Don't see anything unclassy about that and secondly Goddard coming in to play on Kennedy would be plain dumb. And some have said that Lee doesn't even play on the real talls at sandy. You should know that as you claim you actually see Sandy. I have seen no proof from what you write though to say that is true.
Your comment re massage parlours speaks for itself really.
Maybe he knows something about gosaintas that we don'tCon Gorozidis wrote:I am still not 100% sure what the massage parlour reference means, but I have to admit I found it funny anyway#gosaintas wrote:Obviously we should have brought in Goddard or Lee, or both and left Membrey out. We would then have some options in case Kennedy get's off the leash.plugger66 wrote:#gosaintas wrote:Dempster cannot play on big guys or small guys . He is best on the 3rd tall. Really dumb at the selection table
Im unsure you have come up with an answer but I know if he kicks a few you will claim it. If he doesn't you will be at the local parlour getting a massage.
Dumb at the selection table. And before claim "but goddard didn't play last week"...who cares.
As for going to the massage parlour - classy.
great, something we can agree on...........#gosaintas wrote:The only part of that rant I agree with is your last two sentences. Enough from me anyway.
I also hope Acres isn't the sub. I don't think he's the type of player that can start off the ground and try and work into it in the last quarter. I reckon the sub should be a fast player but not sure who.Bluthy wrote:Gee Delaney's hip problems is real worry. He battled it last year a lot. For a 21 y.o. to have a chronic problem like that is a bit of worry. Hope they can work out a fix. Exciting to see Acres in - seeing these young guys come on is making footy so enjoyable for me this year. Membrey makes sense if Paddy needs more work. As much as he work hards, would be great if Membrey can kick a sausage roll or two to justify his place. Hopefully Acres isn't sub.
Our sub should be our worst player playing. So that means either Shenton or EliJacks Back wrote:I also hope Acres isn't the sub. I don't think he's the type of player that can start off the ground and try and work into it in the last quarter. I reckon the sub should be a fast player but not sure who.Bluthy wrote:Gee Delaney's hip problems is real worry. He battled it last year a lot. For a 21 y.o. to have a chronic problem like that is a bit of worry. Hope they can work out a fix. Exciting to see Acres in - seeing these young guys come on is making footy so enjoyable for me this year. Membrey makes sense if Paddy needs more work. As much as he work hards, would be great if Membrey can kick a sausage roll or two to justify his place. Hopefully Acres isn't sub.
I think it was Sinclair last week and that would make a sense again as we need all hands on deck down back to give some cover. I could even see Acres and McKenzie helping out down back a lot with their height and marking. Could it be Schneider? I can only dream.Jacks Back wrote:I also hope Acres isn't the sub. I don't think he's the type of player that can start off the ground and try and work into it in the last quarter. I reckon the sub should be a fast player but not sure who.Bluthy wrote:Gee Delaney's hip problems is real worry. He battled it last year a lot. For a 21 y.o. to have a chronic problem like that is a bit of worry. Hope they can work out a fix. Exciting to see Acres in - seeing these young guys come on is making footy so enjoyable for me this year. Membrey makes sense if Paddy needs more work. As much as he work hards, would be great if Membrey can kick a sausage roll or two to justify his place. Hopefully Acres isn't sub.
You know he's 25, right?Bluthy wrote:Gee Delaney's hip problems is real worry. He battled it last year a lot. For a 21 y.o. to have a chronic problem like that is a bit of worry.
Bluthy wrote:Gee Delaney's hip problems is real worry. He battled it last year a lot. For a 21 y.o. to have a chronic problem like that is a bit of worry. Hope they can work out a fix. Exciting to see Acres in - seeing these young guys come on is making footy so enjoyable for me this year. Membrey makes sense if Paddy needs more work. As much as he work hards, would be great if Membrey can kick a sausage roll or two to justify his place. Hopefully Acres isn't sub.