The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.
Pick two guaranteed.
Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.
Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
A Little More Draft Analysis
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
How can Dangerfield be too old for us? He's exactly the same age as Jack Steven.citywest wrote:The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.
Pick two guaranteed.
Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.
Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
That's true, but if Jack decides to go then I would rather trust our recruiters to grab an 18yo from the draft who will be 24 and in his prime when we are a serious threat rather than grab Danger who will be over 30 by then.bergholt wrote:How can Dangerfield be too old for us? He's exactly the same age as Jack Steven.citywest wrote:The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.
Pick two guaranteed.
Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.
Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
I would hope we are a serious threat before 2022citywest wrote:That's true, but if Jack decides to go then I would rather trust our recruiters to grab an 18yo from the draft who will be 24 and in his prime when we are a serious threat rather than grab Danger who will be over 30 by then.bergholt wrote:How can Dangerfield be too old for us? He's exactly the same age as Jack Steven.citywest wrote:The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.
Pick two guaranteed.
Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.
Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
Bottom of the top 8 by 2018 at the earliest. Flag by 2020 at the earliest.
Last edited by citywest on Sun 11 Jan 2015 7:21pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 597 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
We're already in the bottom 8 so that must put us well ahead.citywest wrote:Bottom 8 by 2018 at the earliest. Flag by 2020 at the earliest.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
Re: A Little More Draft Analysis
Oooops, corrected!!!remboy wrote:We're already in the bottom 8 so that must put us well ahead.citywest wrote:Bottom 8 by 2018 at the earliest. Flag by 2020 at the earliest.