A Little More Draft Analysis

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

citywest

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525127Post citywest »

St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.

Pick two guaranteed.

Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.

Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525208Post bergholt »

citywest wrote:
St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.

Pick two guaranteed.

Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.

Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.
How can Dangerfield be too old for us? He's exactly the same age as Jack Steven.


citywest

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525218Post citywest »

bergholt wrote:
citywest wrote:
St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.

Pick two guaranteed.

Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.

Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.
How can Dangerfield be too old for us? He's exactly the same age as Jack Steven.
That's true, but if Jack decides to go then I would rather trust our recruiters to grab an 18yo from the draft who will be 24 and in his prime when we are a serious threat rather than grab Danger who will be over 30 by then.


St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525240Post St Ick »

citywest wrote:
bergholt wrote:
citywest wrote:
St Ick wrote:Hyperthetical question, Jack Steven walks from the club, gets 750000 a year and says doesn't want to stay at St Kilda, Saints choose not to match for a player who doesn't want to be there.

Pick two guaranteed.

Or we choose to get Dangerfield and forego pick 2.

Or do we get pick two and see who we can pry out of GWSs list?
The answer to that St Ick is we go to the draft and grab an elite mid with pick 2. Dangerfield is too old for us. Put some trust into our recruiters to grab a champion at pick 2.
How can Dangerfield be too old for us? He's exactly the same age as Jack Steven.
That's true, but if Jack decides to go then I would rather trust our recruiters to grab an 18yo from the draft who will be 24 and in his prime when we are a serious threat rather than grab Danger who will be over 30 by then.
I would hope we are a serious threat before 2022 :shock:


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
citywest

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525242Post citywest »

Bottom of the top 8 by 2018 at the earliest. Flag by 2020 at the earliest.
Last edited by citywest on Sun 11 Jan 2015 7:21pm, edited 1 time in total.


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2135
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 597 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525248Post remboy »

citywest wrote:Bottom 8 by 2018 at the earliest. Flag by 2020 at the earliest.
We're already in the bottom 8 so that must put us well ahead. :D


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
citywest

Re: A Little More Draft Analysis

Post: # 1525296Post citywest »

remboy wrote:
citywest wrote:Bottom 8 by 2018 at the earliest. Flag by 2020 at the earliest.
We're already in the bottom 8 so that must put us well ahead. :D
Oooops, corrected!!! :D


Post Reply